186 个 · 按相关度排序
Performs root cause analysis on DAG execution failures. Traces failure propagation, identifies systemic issues, and generates actionable remediation guidance. Activate on 'failure analysis', 'root cause', 'why did it fail', 'debug failure', 'error investigation'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or performance issues (use dag-performance-profiler).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Root-causes one specific mistake the agent just made, such as not committing despite instructions to, by checking it against the loaded AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and Beads memories, delegating the investigation to a separate agent where the harness supports one; proposes concrete context improvements, and lets the user choose which to apply and how to remediate. Use when the user invokes `/learn` or `$learn`, with or without a description of the mistake, including `/learn /qs`-style shorthand naming the corrective command. For a broad end-of-session documentation sweep, use `documentation-updates` (`/reflect`) instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Capture durable project or workflow knowledge discovered during work. Use when a mistake, hidden constraint, repeated question, or changed behavior reveals a documentation gap. To root-cause one specific mistake the agent just made and let the user pick fixes, use `learn` (`/learn`) instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic root-cause debugging that produces a diagnostic report (mk:fix applies the fix; mk:build-fix owns compile failures). Use for 'debug this', 'why is this broken', 'root cause'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Diagnoses and fixes bugs, type/lint errors, CI failures, and runtime errors, root-cause first. NOT for investigation without a fix (mk:investigate) or build-only compile errors (mk:build-fix).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when stuck on approach (not debugging). Strategic unsticking via 7 non-default techniques: simplification cascades, collision-zone thinking, meta-pattern recognition, inversion, scale game, first principles, via negativa. Triggers on complexity spiraling, innovation block, recurring patterns across domains, forced-assumption solutions, scale uncertainty, told-it's-impossible, or bloated systems needing subtraction. For evidence-based root-cause debugging, use mk:sequential-thinking instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when autonomously improving a measurable scalar metric through bounded, git-tracked iterations: modify one scoped change, verify, keep or revert. Triggers on /mk:loop, 'optimize coverage/bundle size/lint count', 'iterate until the metric improves'. NOT for subjective cleanup (see mk:cook), known-root-cause bugs (see mk:fix), behavioral grading (see mk:evaluate), or shipping (see mk:ship).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Diagnoses and fixes bugs, type errors, lint failures, CI/CD issues, and runtime errors via root-cause-first investigation. Use for defect remediation. NOT for investigation without a fix (see mk:investigate); NOT for build-only compilation errors (see mk:build-fix).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. Enforces a strict reproduce-first, root-cause-first, failing-test-first debugging workflow before fixing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deterministically score comparable imported review-run lanes with root-cause metrics and uncertainty. Use only when the user explicitly asks to benchmark normalized local review runs or use the bundled synthetic fixture.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Call this skill when faced with "wicked problems", complex challenges, or when a user asks for strategic innovation, root-cause analysis, or long-term problem solving. Do not use for simple, linear tasks. This skill forces the agent to bypass superficial symptoms, map the entire ecosystem, and anticipate second-order consequences before proposing an intervention.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Trace bugs backward to their origin, not just symptoms
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user reports a hard bug, unexpected failure, or performance regression that needs root-cause analysis.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks for QA analysis, test planning, test cases, or root-cause analysis of a defect. Also use for post-merge PR review analysis: auditing recent closed PRs for Devin/GitHub/security bot comments, verifying whether requested corrections were applied, and turning pending fixes into SPECs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Measure, root-cause, fix, verify and record performance contention on a developer machine: cloud-sync daemons (iCloud Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive), file indexers, AI-tool MCP server fleets, and automation browsers left behind by tests and browser skills. Trigger when the machine is slow, apps freeze, browser or MCP tool calls time out, load exceeds the core count, or before and after any UI/UX/performance test run. Includes the L0–L4 optimisation scale and the test-hygiene contract.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when tracing the root cause of a resolved incident or recurring bug — 5-whys chain, fishbone categorisation, contributing-factors split — even if the user says 'why does this keep breaking?'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
[Implementation] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for root-cause fixes with regression coverage. --target={ci|issue|logs|review|test|types|ui} scopes the issue.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。