“loop”的搜索结果

Runs the daytime maintainer loop for NemoClaw, prioritizing items labeled with the current version target. Picks the highest-value item, executes the right workflow (merge gate, salvage, security sweep, test gaps, hotspot cooling, or sequencing), and reports progress. Use during the workday to land PRs and close issues. Designed for /loop (e.g. /loop 10m /nemoclaw-maintainer-day). Trigger keywords - maintainer day, work on PRs, land PRs, make progress, what's next, keep going, maintainer loop.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Run a bounded, governed iteration — "loop", "iterate until", "keep going until", "sweep", "ratchet", "until it passes", "coverage to 100". Turns an open-ended autonomous run into a finite loop with checkpoints and explicit stopping conditions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

通过Paperclip对单个Terminal-Bench任务进行有次数和时间限制的试验，记录证据、诊断停止原因并管理产品修复审批，持续使用同一隔离工作副本复测。

• 在次数和时间上限内反复验证单个任务
• 诊断基准测试停止的原因
• 管理产品代码修复前的审批

执行项目配置的构建、类型检查和测试命令，将成败结果与失败详情写入报告并保存日志，为自动修复循环判断是否结束提供依据。

• 验证框架迁移后的运行结果
• 编辑完成后检查构建与测试
• 判断自动修复循环何时结束

生成用于产品亮相、预告和氛围背景循环的3至10秒短视频。先整理主体、动作与灯光，再按指定时长和画面比例将MP4保存到项目文件夹。

• 制作产品亮相视频
• 制作带动态效果的短预告
• 制作营造氛围的背景循环

将旋转文字、地球仪和以不同速度运动的多个图层组合成16:9动态首屏，用CSS实现动画，并整理为可供视频导出的HTML文件。

• 制作营销页面的动态首屏
• 制作文字动画标题卡
• 制作圆环与地球仪循环海报

将 GitHub、Discord 和 X 的社区增长措施整理为珊瑚色系 HTML 幻灯片，结合发布日历、增长循环与成果计算，说明计划和数值之间的关系。

• 提案社区增长计划
• 规划 GitHub、Discord 和 X 的发布
• 解释增长机制与相关数值

引导反复评审、调整和完善已实现的界面，缩小其与设计要求之间的视觉差异；此目录条目用于找到原始工作流程，完整使用前需另行安装。

• 对照已实现界面与设计要求
• 反复调整界面的视觉差异
• 规划从设计到实现的复查环节

Choose the next task using patterns learned from completed work and current progress. The skill acts on confident predictions, falls back to task priorities when confidence is low, and updates its learning after completion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Choosing the next task from current progress
• Guiding repeated work within a /loop
• Finding relevant examples in past completions

Run one cycle of autonomous task work in Claude Code: check progress, select and execute the next action, log the work, and schedule another cycle. Stop when all tasks are complete or the iteration limit is reached.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Continuing work from a Claude Code task list
• Working through Markdown checklist items
• Running tasks managed through MCP

Audit large animated GIFs that may slow a web page, confirm their impact with performance measurements, and guide conversion to MP4 or WebM with video markup suited to looping animations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Investigating slow pages that contain animated GIFs
• Replacing large GIFs with MP4 or WebM
• Reviewing playback attributes for looping videos

Generate sound effects and ambient audio from written descriptions using ElevenLabs. Create cinematic impacts, app notification sounds, or background textures, with controls for duration, seamless looping, and how closely the sound follows the description.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Create impact sounds for videos
• Generate looping rain or forest ambience
• Make notification sounds for apps

Breaks long-running goals into small, verifiable steps, tracks progress, and records evidence from actual operation. Checkpoints preserve what has been proven so work can resume after interruptions and continue toward explicit completion criteria.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Managing a long-running development goal
• Resuming work after an interruption
• Recording evidence for completion criteria

Guide a scoped coding task through specification, implementation, and review. Set acceptance criteria, verification checks, iteration limits, and approval gates, then correct identified gaps until the requirements pass or a stopping condition is reached.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Build a small feature from specification through verification
• Modify a module against explicit acceptance criteria
• Repeat fixes and checks within an iteration limit

Connect Gmail, Calendar, and Contacts to track people awaiting replies and promises still outstanding. Get a prioritized digest with supporting quotes, email links, deadlines when available, and background context to help prepare a response.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Set up Google account connections
• Check who is waiting for a reply or promised action
• Review someone’s history before preparing a response

Build a computer-control loop where Cua Driver observes and acts, while TypeSafe Jev chooses from predefined actions. Validate each choice, execute one action at a time, and verify the result before continuing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Build a Jev integration for browser automation
• Create action candidates for native desktop apps
• Reject stale or unknown action choices

Coordinate project delivery by routing requests to eight specialist skills or running a verified delivery workflow. Use live Jira data for progress analysis and completion forecasts, with recorded evidence and checks before tasks are closed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Analyze sprint progress and forecast completion ranges
• Produce project health reports from live Jira data
• Route Jira permission and configuration reviews

Route product questions to a specialist for prioritization, research, analytics, experiments, or implementation. Support recurring discovery by tracking interviews and assumption tests, checking how customer needs connect to proposed solutions, and returning results with a concise digest.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Prioritizing features with an explicit framework
• Planning product experiments and sample sizes
• Tracking weekly interviews and assumption tests

Build and review Kubernetes Operators, controllers that keep custom resources in their desired state. Included tools check resource definitions and Go reconciliation code, then assess operational capabilities and suggest improvements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Designing custom resource definitions for a new Operator
• Reviewing Go reconciliation code for common mistakes
• Assessing Operator capabilities and planning improvements

Build a short, playable game sequence before full production to check whether the complete gameplay loop works at the intended quality. Use playtest observations and daily progress records to assess feasibility and decide the next direction.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking production feasibility after game design is complete
• Testing a complete gameplay loop with players
• Estimating production speed from actual build progress

Design the controls around autonomous agents: what they can edit, how results are evaluated, how progress is logged, and when human approval is required. Build research and experiment loops with clear recovery and review rules.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Designing autonomous research and experiment loops
• Separating editable work from fixed evaluation rules
• Preserving progress and failed attempts across long runs

Improve research through repeated Gemini reviews, code changes, experiments, and analysis. The workflow records full feedback and actions, then stops when both the score and readiness criteria are met or the round limit is reached.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Improving research through repeated external reviews
• Implementing and checking fixes for research weaknesses
• Keeping a complete record of reviews and experiments

Iteratively improve research by having Claude Code review code, results, and drafts while Codex implements fixes. Repeat until the assessment meets the stopping criteria or the round limit is reached, preserving feedback and unresolved issues.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Repeating research reviews and fixes before submission
• Checking whether claims match code and experiment results
• Tracking how reviewer concerns are addressed across rounds