Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Prioritizes rare-disease variants from trio/quad WES/WGS with de novo (DeNovoGear, Triodenovo), compound-heterozygous phasing (WhatsHap), mosaic VAF tiering, phenotype-driven ranking (Exomiser, Phen2Gene, AMELIE), ClinGen gene-disease validity gating, and ACMG SF v3.2 secondary findings reporting. Use when running diagnostic exome / genome pipelines, identifying candidate Mendelian disease genes, screening for incidental findings, or auditing VUS reclassification cycles. The ACMG/AMP classification framework (PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver PP3/BP4 calibration, Tavtigian point system) is in clinical-databases/acmg-classification.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Calculates tumor mutational burden from WES/WGS/panel data with Friends of Cancer Research harmonization equations, per-assay calibration (FDA 10/Mb = 7.8 TSO500 = 8.4 OncomineTML), synonymous/indel/germline filtering, hypermutator tiering, blood TMB, and integration with HLA-LOH and neoantigen quality (Luksza 2017 fitness). Use when assessing ICI eligibility under tumor-specific cutoffs (McGrail 2021), comparing tissue vs bTMB, or auditing TMB-H reporting against ESMO 2024 and FDA pembrolizumab pan-tumor 2020.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Constructs and validates polygenic risk scores using LDpred2-auto, SBayesRC, MegaPRS, PRS-CS, PROSPER, MUSSEL, BridgePRS, JointPRS, PRSmix, or PGS Catalog Calculator with ancestry-aware reference panels (HapMap3, UKB-LD), Pejaver-style calibration, and PRS-RS reporting standards. Use when computing PRS for cohorts, applying Whiffin-style absolute-risk transformation, assessing cross-ancestry portability (Martin 2017 / Ding 2023 continuous ancestry), or auditing PRS manuscripts against the 22-item PRS-RS reviewer checklist.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Prepares statistical reports for clinical trials following CONSORT 2025, SPIRIT 2025, ICH E9(R1) estimands, and FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Covers Table 1 generation, analysis populations (ITT/FAS/PP/Safety), the 5 ICH E9(R1) intercurrent-event strategies, MMRM under MAR (mmrm), reference-based MI (rbmi J2R/CR/CIR), Permutt tipping-point sensitivity, and Rubin's-rules vs frequentist variance debate. Use when preparing regulatory submissions, defining estimands, or implementing missing-data sensitivity analyses.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Performs logistic regression for clinical trial outcomes (binary, ordinal, multinomial) with marginal-vs-conditional estimand reporting per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance, g-computation/standardisation for marginal effects, modified Poisson for RR, Brant test for proportional odds, Firth penalty for separation, and Hauck-Donner detection. Use when modeling binary or ordinal endpoints in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Computes and interprets treatment effect measures (OR, RR, RD, HR, NNT) with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen, MOVER, profile likelihood, Bender NNT) and reports marginal vs conditional estimands per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Use when reporting treatment effects in confirmatory trials, comparing effect sizes across studies, or constructing forest plots.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Use this skill when the user asks how to build + manage direct shipper relationships — moving from spot market to dedicated lanes, customer scoring + credit assessment, contract terms, dedicated capacity agreements, KPI reporting, and how to handle customer disputes. Reference standard customer-carrier contract terms.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill when the user asks how to build, measure, or improve safety culture in a motor carrier — leading vs lagging safety indicators, blame-free reporting, near-miss programs, safety committee structure, monthly safety meetings, ATA Safety Management Program guidance, and how to evaluate cultural maturity. Reference ATA SMP + DOT safety culture research.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill to clarify when a driver must report a conviction to the carrier, and what records the driver must maintain. Covers § 391.27 annual driver's certificate.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill when the user asks about International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) compliance — quarterly returns, jurisdiction reporting, fuel + miles reconciliation, IFTA-100/101 forms, base jurisdiction selection, IFTA license + decals, recordkeeping requirements, common IFTA audit findings, or how to handle non-IFTA jurisdictions. Cite IFTA Articles of Agreement.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill when the user asks about the FMCSA Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse — full vs limited query, pre-employment vs annual query, query credit purchasing, who has access (employers, drivers, MROs, SAPs, state licensing agencies), reporting violations to the Clearinghouse, the "prohibited" status workflow, consent forms, or how to register/use the clearinghouse.fmcsa.dot.gov portal. Cite 49 CFR 382.701-727.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use when a carrier asks about fuel-card vendor selection (Comdata, EFS, WEX, RTS, Pilot Flying J, Love's Connect), discount levels, fraud control, driver authorization PINs, IFTA reporting features, cash advance, money codes, or how the card fits into payroll/settlement workflows.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill to investigate a crash effectively. Covers preservation of evidence, witness statements, dashcam review, and reporting timeline.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill for transporting logs. Covers § 393.116 specific rules, bunks, stakes, and tiedowns required.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill for transporting heavy machinery (construction, agricultural, industrial). Covers § 393.130 rules, lashing requirements, and platform compliance.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill for transporting pipes (water, gas, oil, structural). Covers § 393.122 specific rules and roll-prevention.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Use this skill for transporting steel coils. Covers § 393.120 specific rules, chain requirements, dunnage placement, and inspection procedures.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
x3allamerican/skills☆ 32026年5月17日 更新
Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新
Rigorous benchmarking of multi-agent coordination systems: experiment design, statistical analysis, human evaluation protocols, and reproducible reporting. NOT FOR ML model evaluation (use llm-evaluation-harness), A/B testing for web products, survey design, or general data science.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新
Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新
Generate, fill, and assemble PDF documents at scale. Handles legal forms, contracts, invoices, certificates. Supports form filling (pdf-lib), template rendering (Puppeteer, LaTeX), digital signatures (DocuSign), and document assembly. Use for legal tech, HR automation, invoice generation. Activate on "PDF generation", "form filling", "document automation", "digital signatures". NOT for simple PDF viewing, basic file conversion, or OCR text extraction.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新
Render mathematically-faithful Turkish marbling (Ebru) and paper-marbling with closed-form coordinate-deformation maps — a drop is a radial outward push, a comb/tine is a decaying shear, all composed as homeomorphisms over colored region boundaries. No fluid solver, runs 60fps on a 2D canvas. Use when building a marbling/Ebru toy or generative-art renderer, implementing drop/comb/wave/swirl deformations, scripting traditional patterns (Battal, Gel-Git, Şal, Bülbül Yuvası), keeping combed edges crisp via adaptive resampling, modeling ox-gall shouldering for crisp ring-in-ring drops, or exporting high-DPI marbled prints. NOT for real fluid / Navier-Stokes simulation, metaball / alpha-blended "smoke" blob effects, raster image-processing filters, or non-marbling generative art.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新
Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新