“reliability”的搜索结果

Evaluate Jacobian reliability using recently resolved conjectures as held-out probes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Create or audit SLOs, SLIs, alert rules, incident response steps, escalation paths, postmortems, operational runbooks, and customer-impact communication. Use when defining production reliability, preparing launch readiness, responding to an outage, writing a runbook, tuning alerts, or closing the loop after an incident.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Review whether a repository's coding-agent harness can reliably carry work from intent through controlled execution, verification, delivery, and learning. Use when asked to assess agent readiness, repeated agent failures, Rules/Skills/Hooks/Memory effectiveness, missing validation or recovery loops, or whether a harness repair improved later outcomes. Do not use for code-only audits, AGENTS-only audits, individual skill reliability reviews, or executing the task itself.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Fix silent failures in Fastly Compute@Edge when using send_async for fire-and-forget requests. Use when: (1) Background tasks (migrations, webhooks, notifications) triggered from Compute never complete, (2) send_async PendingRequest is immediately dropped, (3) Fire-and-forget pattern works locally but fails in production, (4) An async trigger "logs as triggered" but the target service never receives the request (especially after renaming backend constants — the URL hostname is cosmetic, the backend name determines routing, so a global rename can silently reroute calls to the wrong service). Also covers silent backend-not-found errors when FALLBACK_BACKENDS or other backend constants reference names not configured in the Fastly dashboard.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Identifies non-deterministic or unreliable tests through static code analysis and test result analysis. Use when Claude needs to find flaky tests, analyze test reliability, or investigate intermittent test failures. Supports Python (pytest, unittest) and Java (JUnit, TestNG) test frameworks. Trigger when users mention "flaky tests", "intermittent failures", "non-deterministic tests", "unreliable tests", or ask to "find flaky tests", "analyze test stability", or "why tests fail randomly".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when the user drops or points at a local talking-head video and wants the kinetic supers + rapid camera reposition prompt for video-to-video AI (one real take turned into split-second camera snaps that lock off, with bold motion-graphics text synced to the speech). Triggers on /kinetic-multicam, "kinetic supers", "kinetic typography video", a dropped .mp4 plus a motion-graphics-text + camera request. PT examples for reliability, "faz o prompt de kinetic supers desse vídeo", "gera supers cinéticos com cortes de câmera", "bota motion graphics e câmera nesse take".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Detect test smells, overmocking, flaky tests, and coverage issues. Analyze test effectiveness, maintainability, and reliability. Use when reviewing tests or improving test quality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Monitor cloud infrastructure and applications using metrics, logs, and traces to provide real-time observability into performance, health, and reliability. Use when the user requests cloud monitoring or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design reproducible evaluations for AI agents with representative task sets, explicit rubrics, appropriate graders, baselines, regression gates, and failure analysis. Use when defining agent quality, comparing prompts or models, validating a release, measuring tool-use reliability, investigating regressions, or deciding whether an agent is ready for production.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert MEMS Engineer. Use when a task calls for MEMS Engineer judgment. Reasons from scale-dependent mechanics, squeeze-film damping, and electrostatic pull-in through DRIE Bosch/surface micromachining, CoventorMP/COMSOL, foundry PDKs, LDV/WLI metrology, and AEC-Q103 qual while treating release stiction, DRIE scallop bias, package-stress offset drift, and functional-WLT-vs-reliability gaps as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Electronic Materials Engineer. Use when a task calls for Electronic Materials Engineer judgment. Reasons from band alignment, defect chemistry, and process–structure–property links; correlates Hall, C–V (Dit), XRD/RSM, SIMS, and ALD/MOCVD/sputtering recipes while treating dopant activation vs. chemical dose, high-κ trap charging, and reliability (NBTI/TDDB) as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Biomedical Imaging Scientist. Use when a task calls for Biomedical Imaging Scientist judgment. Reasons from contrast mechanisms, the resolution-SNR-scan-time triangle, and measurement reliability through DICOM/BIDS pipelines, QIBA profiles, phantom QC (ACR, NEMA IQ, Catphan), and blinded central reads (RECIST, RANO, PERCIST) while treating motion, partial volume effects, and cross-scanner harmonization drift as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Plan and scope production work with Odyssey's real-time interactive video world models (odyssey.ml — Odyssey-1/Odyssey-2/Starchild-1/Agora-1). Use when a request involves generating video that a user steers live with keyboard, text, speech, or controller input (streamed frames that respond in the moment), or when someone must decide between Odyssey-style interactive generation and offline clip generators (Sora/Veo/Kling) or downloadable 3D / game engines. Covers what is verified versus announced, current access routes, latency and coherence limits, feasible-now versus speculative use cases, pricing/access terms, and content/rights considerations. This is a fast-moving research-stage product; the skill teaches honest scoping, not a promise of production reliability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Research npm packages — download stats, dependencies, maintainers, version history, and security advisories. Useful for technology due diligence, dependency auditing, and evaluating package reliability before adoption.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Runtime per-test healing with evidence: multi-attribute selector healing, environment-aware diagnosis, flake classification, quarantine management, and confidence-scored auto-repair. Goes beyond simple locator fallbacks to cover action-level healing, data healing, and observable repair workflows. Use when: "flaky test," "test stability," "self-healing locator," "broken locator recovery," "unreliable test," "quarantine flaky test." Not for: bulk regenerating selectors after a planned UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery (this skill heals ONE test at runtime; that one rewrites many tests offline). Not for: classifying/clustering CI failures into bug reports — use ai-bug-triage. Related: playwright-automation, selector-drift-recovery, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Analyze escaped defects and test suite health through blameless postmortems. Covers bug pattern analysis, test suite health reviews, 5 Whys root cause analysis, process improvement cycles, and postmortem/retro meeting templates with action item tracking. Use when: "QA retro," "escaped bugs," "postmortem," "quality incident," "defect analysis," "improvement cycle." Not for: live release go/no-go decisions — use release-readiness. Not for ongoing metric dashboards — use qa-metrics. Not for reviewing existing test code quality — use ai-qa-review. Related: qa-metrics, test-reliability, test-strategy.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Test native, React Native, hybrid, and Flutter mobile apps with Appium 3.x, Detox, Maestro, and Patrol. Covers device farm setup (BrowserStack, Sauce Labs), gesture simulation, deep link and cold-start testing, push notifications, biometric (Face ID) auth, offline/poor-network simulation, and iOS/Android permission dialog handling. Use when: "mobile test," "Appium," "Detox," "Maestro," "Patrol," "Flutter test," "iOS test," "Android test," "device farm," "deep link," "biometric," "Face ID," "permission dialog," "React Native test." Not for: device/browser matrix strategy in the abstract — use cross-browser-testing; app startup/memory/battery profiling depth — use performance-testing; mobile screenshot diffing — use visual-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, cross-browser-testing, performance-testing, test-data-management, test-reliability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Validate system resilience through controlled fault injection. Covers hypothesis-driven chaos experiments, failure injection types (network, service, infrastructure, dependency), LitmusChaos/Chaos Mesh/AWS FIS/Gremlin/toxiproxy tooling, automated abort gating, game day planning, and progressive chaos adoption. Use when: "chaos engineering," "fault injection," "resilience test," "game day," "failure recovery," "system reliability," "blast radius." Not for: safe rollout flags/canary/dark launch during a release — use testing-in-production; designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, observability-driven-testing, performance-testing, release-readiness, test-environments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when: "test strategy," "QA strategy doc," "testing approach," "QA roadmap," "multi-quarter QA direction." Not for: a single-sprint or single-release plan — use test-planning. Not for: identifying which areas carry the most risk — use risk-based-testing first. Related: risk-based-testing, qa-metrics, release-readiness, test-planning, test-reliability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Review EXISTING test code for quality, smells, and testability issues. Detects test smells across six dimensions — readability, reliability, diagnostic value, design, AI-generated, and coverage — analyzes testability of application code, and backs the qualitative smells with mutation testing. Use when: "review my tests," "test quality audit," "test smells," "testability analysis," "are these tests any good." Not for: generating new tests — use `ai-test-generation`. Not for: testing AI features in your product — use `ai-system-testing`. Related: unit-testing, shift-left-testing, coverage-analysis, ai-test-generation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Hybrid fingerprint + LLM pipeline for bug classification, deduplication, and ticket generation. Normalizes CI logs, creates stable fingerprints, clusters near-duplicates, then uses LLM for severity classification and ticket writing. Includes bug reporting templates and severity/priority matrix. Use when: "bug triage," "classify bugs," "failure analysis," "auto-classify," "CI failures," "bug report," "defect template." Not for: runtime self-healing of one flaky locator — use test-reliability. Not for: designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, ci-cd-integration, qa-project-context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。