5 个 · 按相关度排序
Explore computer science and AI research directions using eight creativity frameworks. Combine ideas across fields, question hidden assumptions, and transfer mechanisms from other disciplines to develop research questions with testable predictions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Applies TRIZ cross-domain analogical reasoning to find solutions from adjacent fields. Use when stuck on a problem and needing inventive perspectives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
当AI智能体需要处理以下情形时触发本技能： 1. 当前案件/问题在现行法律中没有直接、明确的规定（法律漏洞）； 2. 需要参考已有判例、相似案件或相近法律规范来推导当前问题的处理方案； 3. 用户明确要求"参照""比照""类推适用"某一规范或案例； 4. 在法律论证中需要以"相似案件相似处理"（Like cases should be treated alike）原则支撑结论； 5. 需要评估两个或多个案件/规范之间的相似性与差异性，以判断能否进行类比； 6. 在合同解释、侵权责任认定、行政处罚裁量等场景中，需要借助类似情形的处理经验形成论证。 本技能的核心是：识别相似性基础（tertium comparationis），论证类比的正当性，并在此基础上得出合理的法律结论。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。