“critique”的搜索结果

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Explore training workflows that reduce harmful model responses using a written set of principles. The skill covers self-critique, revised training examples, and RLAIF, reinforcement learning from AI feedback, with implementation examples and hardware guidance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Designing principles for model safety training
• Creating training examples through self-critique and revision
• Planning reinforcement learning with AI-rated responses

Explore training workflows that reduce harmful model responses using a written set of principles. The skill covers self-critique, revised training examples, and RLAIF, reinforcement learning from AI feedback, with implementation examples and hardware guidance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Designing principles for model safety training
• Creating training examples through self-critique and revision
• Planning reinforcement learning with AI-rated responses

Choose charts and diagrams that fit the data and the question readers need to answer. Plan layouts and interactions for large screens and mobile devices, or critique existing visuals for misleading comparisons, unclear labels, and hidden information.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Choose a chart for a specific analytical question
• Review an existing chart for misleading presentation
• Plan dashboard layouts for desktop and mobile

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on "brief this case", "case brief", "explain the holding", "what did the court hold", "hypotheticals based on", "critique this opinion", "vote table", "Beamer presentation", "chapter brief", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design lens critique covering visual hierarchy, clarity, and anti-slop patterns — produces a findings table, no code edits unless asked. Use when the user wants a design review, says "what's wrong with this UI", or needs a second opinion before a handoff or presentation. Invoke when the user asks for critique on their UI, or mentions 'critique' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Critique a design for usability, hierarchy, and accessibility. Use when the user says "critique this design", "review this screen", "what's wrong with this UI", "design feedback", "UX review", "how can I improve this", "review my mockup", "is this good UX", or shares a design and wants structured feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "design critique".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

为council整理的重要决策草案追加一次Codex外部批评，检查结论的薄弱之处、遗漏的失败情形，以及是否充分处理最有力的反对意见。

• 审视难以判断的重要决策草案
• 检查草案遗漏的失败可能性
• 确认是否忽略有力的反对意见

执行项目配置的构建、类型检查和测试命令，将成败结果与失败详情写入报告并保存日志，为自动修复循环判断是否结束提供依据。

• 验证框架迁移后的运行结果
• 编辑完成后检查构建与测试
• 判断自动修复循环何时结束

从五个设计维度为HTML页面或幻灯片评分并提供依据，将雷达图、应保留内容、待修改问题和短时间可完成的改进汇总为一份HTML报告。

• 交付前检查落地页设计
• 检查HTML幻灯片的可读性与操作
• 比较两个设计方案

Revisit a recent answer, plan, draft, or decision using selected critique methods. The skill offers relevant approaches, explains what they reveal, and proposes improvements that are applied only after the user accepts them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Examining assumptions in a plan
• Reviewing a draft from several perspectives
• Exploring failure risks before a launch

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing theories for a research question
• Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
• Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections

Critique a rendered screen's composition — balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt grouping. Use when a layout feels off but hierarchy is fine. For emphasis and eye flow specifically, use `critique-visual-hierarchy`.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Self-critique specification documents using extended thinking — surfaces hidden assumptions, contradictions, missing edge cases, and scope creep before implementation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

在实施前从设计师视角检查UI/UX计划，为各项设计评分，并通过对话明确缺失的设计决策，将改进直接补入计划。

• 在实施前检查UI/UX计划
• 找出尚未明确的设计决策
• 将设计评审意见落实到计划

根据用户目标检查界面、操作流程和组件，评估信息层次、操作提示、表单、错误引导与可访问性，按理由和优先级整理修改建议，并指出后续应保留的优点。

• 获取界面或模型的具体反馈
• 在功能发布前检查易用性
• 检查疑似导致用户流失的流程

引导反复评审、调整和完善已实现的界面，缩小其与设计要求之间的视觉差异；此目录条目用于找到原始工作流程，完整使用前需另行安装。

• 对照已实现界面与设计要求
• 反复调整界面的视觉差异
• 规划从设计到实现的复查环节

依据Dieter Rams的十项原则检查界面或产品设计，并提供有证据支持的评分，判断应新建、改进还是重新设计，再整理成用于制定执行计划的请求。

• 依据Dieter Rams十项原则检查界面
• 决定改进界面还是重新设计
• 凭证据检查界面文案与易用性

Have agents with different roles challenge a proposed approach, exposing weak assumptions, missed interactions, and unnecessary complexity. Surviving findings go to a dedicated planning agent, which produces sequenced tasks with explicit success criteria.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking assumptions before committing to a plan
• Finding integration risks and overlooked edge cases
• Challenging unnecessary complexity in a design

Uses multiple agents with different critical roles to challenge assumptions, complexity, risks, and alternatives. Findings that withstand review go to a dedicated planner, who turns them into sequenced tasks with explicit success criteria.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Reviewing assumptions before implementation
• Checking integration risks and edge cases
• Comparing alternative approaches

Review existing Appwrite blog posts for tone, structure, SEO, formatting, and product accuracy. Compare claims with local documentation, identify specific problems, and produce a structured report with suggested rewrites and prioritized fixes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Review an Appwrite blog draft before publication
• Audit titles, summaries, and search intent
• Verify feature descriptions and API details against local docs

Review a Figma design, screenshot, or written description for usability, visual hierarchy, consistency, and accessibility. Receive specific findings, explanations, and prioritized improvements, with feedback tailored to the design stage and intended users.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Reviewing an early screen design
• Checking navigation and onboarding usability
• Finding inconsistent colors, spacing, and typography