3 个 · 按相关度排序
Use when the user asks what they are not seeing, what they forgot, what could go wrong, or what an expert would say about a plan, decision, document, code change, or setup they already have. Triggers: "what am I missing", "what don't I know", "poke holes in this", "what would an expert ask", "что я упускаю", "что я не вижу", or /clueless-blindspots. One-shot review; does not change the always-on level.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Monthly, on the last weekday, file work only, no browser at all. Folds the decision ledger, scores this Employee's own judgement against the metric files that measured it rather than against its own predictions, appends one outcome line per closed decision, retires a move proposed three times and never accepted, and rewrites the priorities where the evidence disagrees with them. It refuses to publish a calibration figure on too few closed decisions, changes nothing outside its own folder, proposes nothing to anybody, sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use to audit a past architectural decision — did the chosen option hold up, what assumptions drifted, should the ADR be superseded? Backward review only; does not lock new choices.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。