“deep-research”的搜索结果

When you want multi-source, multi-step research on a topic — competitor research before a sales call, market research for a new business idea, positioning angles, due diligence on a partnership or podcast guest, tech decision research (which DB, which auth), or any "I need to actually understand X." Combines web search, URL fetch, agent-browser, last30days (Reddit/X/YouTube/HN/web recency), memory, and Notion. Outputs a structured brief with citations, contradictions, gaps, and recommended next steps. Archives every research run to ~/.config/makerskills/deep-research/archive/ so past work is searchable. Triggers on "/deep-research," "research X," "investigate X," "do a deep dive on X," "look into X," "what's actually happening with X," "due diligence on X," "validate this market." Differs from a one-shot web search: this is multi-pass with verification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Hoyeon deep research workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-deep-research" or wants a multi-channel cited research report using web search, browser extraction, and optional Gemini. This adapter loads the canonical deep-research skill and follows its Codex runtime surface.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Research a question from five search angles, gather sources, and test their claims through multiple verification judgments. The workflow combines overlapping findings and produces a cited report with conclusions ranked by confidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Investigating a topic from several perspectives
• Checking claims across multiple web sources
• Preparing a research report with citations

Coordinate a research project from topic exploration to a final manuscript. The skill connects research, writing, integrity checks, review, and revision workflows, tracks deliverables, and records progress with user confirmation at stage boundaries.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Taking a research topic through to a final manuscript
• Resuming a workflow from an existing draft or reviewer comments
• Tracking checks, revisions, and the paper creation process

深度调研方法论（8步法）：将模糊主题转化为高质量调研报告。 触发词：/deep-research、深度调研、帮我调研、调研一下、对比分析 注意：如果用户需要的是可视化图谱而非报告，请使用 research-to-diagram skill。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Deep web research skill using parallel subagents + chromux browser-explorer + Gemini. Spawns multiple WebSearch research agents AND browser-explorer agents (via chromux for JS-heavy/dynamic sites), plus a Gemini CLI deep research source, then synthesizes everything into a cited report. Uses WebSearch, WebFetch, chromux browser-explorer, and Gemini CLI. Invoke with /deep-research <topic>.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Builds repeatable deep-research workflows for verified synthesis. Use when producing evidence-backed briefs, comparisons, dossiers, or research pipelines.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Multi-step autonomous research methodology for deep investigation tasks with structured synthesis

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Multi-angle deep-research workflow over Ahmad's OpenMark knowledge graph (13k+ bookmarks). Use whenever Ahmad asks anything that requires more than one search to answer well — "what's the landscape of X in my saves", "do a deep dive on Y", "research X across my bookmarks", "compare what I saved about X vs Y", "give me everything on X". Also use when fast-search returned thin results and Ahmad pushed back ("dig deeper", "more results", "actually research it"). Pairs Neo4j graph search with WebFetch on top picks to bring back fresh page content. Triggers on "deep research", "dig deeper", "research", "landscape", "everything on", "thorough", "comprehensive".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Deep Research Agent specializes in complex, multi-step research tasks that require planning, decomposition, and long-context reasoning across tools and files by we-crafted.com/agents/deep-research

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

将最新公开信息与用户提供的资料相互核对，区分事实、推断和建议，并根据事实核查、选项比较或人物与企业调查选择方法，整理有依据的结果。

• 用最新信息核验已有资料
• 比较候选方案以支持决策
• 调查拟咨询的人物和企业

将调研主题拆分为多个问题，搜索网页并阅读全文，交叉核对资料，整理成附有来源、可信程度和信息缺口说明的报告，为判断提供依据。

• 调研竞争对手与市场趋势
• 采用技术前进行比较
• 调查市场规模与增长预测

Research a topic across multiple web sources before writing articles, reports, or presentations. Gather facts, examples, and expert views, then check current information, competing perspectives, and limitations to build a well-supported understanding.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Researching evidence before writing an article
• Gathering data and examples for presentation slides
• Comparing technologies and their limitations

Investigate a GitHub project through repository data and web sources, then produce a Markdown report covering its development history, technical structure, activity metrics, and alternatives, with citations and diagrams where useful.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Investigating an open source project's technical structure
• Reconstructing development milestones from commits and releases
• Comparing a project with competing alternatives

Turn research findings stored in memory into structured reports with evidence ratings, source references, and practical recommendations. Compare conflicting claims, identify unresolved questions, and explain limitations so accumulated research can support decisions and next steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Combine findings from several research sessions
• Compare conflicting claims and their supporting evidence
• Prepare a research brief with recommended next steps

Investigate complex topics using web sources, stored knowledge, and relevant code. Break questions into smaller parts, compare evidence, and produce a structured report with confidence assessments, unresolved questions, and next steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Investigating a complex topic through smaller research questions
• Comparing web sources with stored knowledge and code
• Summarizing evidence quality and conflicting findings

Research a topic across multiple sources and turn the findings into a readable report. The skill coordinates separate research agents to compare options, examine markets or trends, and synthesize literature into a coherent narrative.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing products or services
• Researching markets and industry trends
• Reviewing studies on a topic

Develop a research question, search and verify literature, and combine findings into an academic report. Modes also support guided research discussions, claim checking, paper comparisons, and systematic reviews with optional meta-analysis, which statistically combines study results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Clarify a research direction through guided questions
• Search literature and compare findings across sources
• Check specific claims against supporting sources

Create courses grounded in verified external facts, including recent developments, market data, product details, and scientific findings. It researches sources, records which evidence supports each claim, and carries those findings and uncertainties into page plans and content.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Creating a course about recent events or industry developments
• Building lessons around verified market or policy data
• Teaching product details or scientific findings with sources

Check important factual claims in courses or supplied content against available materials and authoritative sources. Review numbers, definitions, and contradictions, then receive a concise report with evidence and suggested corrections, or have generated course pages checked before delivery.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking facts in a completed course
• Verifying important numbers and technical definitions
• Finding contradictions between course pages

Plan and build a connected series of lessons around learners’ experience and goals. After the user approves the complete lesson list, it creates lessons in order, checks continuity, and organizes them in one folder.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Building a seven-day introductory Python course
• Creating a four-week onboarding program
• Turning book chapters into separate lessons

Run Gemini research tasks that plan searches, read sources, and combine findings into cited reports. Specify a report structure, monitor progress, and continue earlier research with follow-up questions for market, technical, historical, or comparative studies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Research a market and its competitors
• Review technical literature
• Compare products or technologies