124 个 · 按相关度排序
Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build hallucination detection systems for AI. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-hallucination-detector related tasks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Exploit an application's absolute trust in its underlying LLM (Overreliance). Use this skill to induce critical "hallucinations" (confident falsehoods) that cause downstream logical systems or automated agents tracking the LLM's output to make destructive actions or grant unauthorized access.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Detects fabricated content, false citations, and unverifiable claims in agent outputs. Uses source verification and consistency checking. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build hallucination detection systems for AI. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-hallucination-detector related tasks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Performs claim-evidence verification for agent outputs, recording supported, contradicted, or insufficient-evidence results alongside source accessibility. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Configure safety checks for LLM applications with NeMo Guardrails. Covers attempts to bypass safety rules, input and output validation, masking personal information, and checking factual claims through programmable rules and integrations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Add safety checks to LLM applications with NeMo Guardrails. This skill guides input and output validation, detection of attempts to bypass safety rules, personal information masking, and checks for unsupported or inaccurate answers.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content. Use when fact-checking legal documents, validating citations, detecting hallucinations, scoring document quality, or assessing distribution readiness.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Verifies a package exists before install, defending against hallucination and slopsquatting. Use when adding, recommending, or installing a package.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implement comprehensive observability for LLM applications including tracing (Langfuse/Helicone), cost tracking, token optimization, RAG evaluation metrics (RAGAS), hallucination detection, and production monitoring. Essential for debugging, optimizing costs, and ensuring AI output quality. Use when ", llm-monitoring, tracing, langfuse, helicone, cost-tracking, ragas, evaluation, hallucination-detection, prompt-caching" mentioned.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design new proteins that bind a chosen surface, using BindCraft's AlphaFold2-guided hallucination or the RFdiffusion backbone plus ProteinMPNN sequence pipeline. Use this skill to specify a target epitope by hotspot residue, trim a receptor to the region worth designing against, set up a design campaign, and filter the output on the in-silico metrics that predict experimental success — interface predicted TM-score, predicted aligned error at the interface, buried surface area, and shape complementarity. Also trigger on BindCraft, RFdiffusion, ProteinMPNN, minibinder, hallucination, inverse folding, hotspot residue, epitope targeting, ipTM, or de novo binder.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Performs a hallucination check on machine_readable sections by verifying every element traces back to the original legal text. Use this skill proactively when: machine_readable sections have been generated or modified, after /law-generate completes, when reviewing corpus YAML files for legal accuracy, or when user mentions "validate", "verify", or "hallucination check" for law YAML files. Activate automatically after editing machine_readable sections in corpus regulation YAML files.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Author and run offline evals for Agentforce agents: fixture format, scoring rubrics, hallucination checks, regression baselines, CI integration, prompt-change safety. Trigger keywords: agent eval, hallucination, doesn't hallucinate, agentforce offline evals, rubric for agent response. NOT for deciding which layers of testing the agent needs — use agentforce/agentforce-testing-strategy. NOT for Testing Center, AiEvaluationDefinition or sf agent test runs — use agentforce/agent-testing-and-evaluation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Validates agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. Ensures outputs meet structural requirements and content standards. Activate on 'validate output', 'output validation', 'schema validation', 'check output', 'output quality'. NOT for confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Adaption AI SDK for synthetic data augmentation and dataset adaptation. Use when building data pipelines with the Adaption Python SDK, uploading datasets (local files, Hugging Face, Kaggle), running augmentation/adaptation jobs, configuring brand controls (hallucination mitigation, safety categories, length), recipe specifications (reasoning traces, deduplication, preference pairs, prompt rephrase), evaluating dataset quality, downloading results, or any workflow involving `pip install adaption`, `from adaption import Adaption`, Adaptive Data, or the adaptionlabs.ai API. Also trigger when the user mentions synthetic data generation for fine-tuning, dataset augmentation pipelines, DPO preference pair generation, or grounding-based hallucination reduction on training data.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。