“knowledge management”的搜索结果

将文档、会话和项目信息分类保存到合适的位置，跨本地文件、记忆工具、知识库和数据库查重、同步与检索，并维护索引和摘要。

• 将文档和会话保存到知识库
• 整理重复笔记
• 同步多个存储位置的知识

"Apply the Knowledge-Based View (Grant, 1996) and Nonaka and Takeuchi's SECI model to analyze how organizations create, transfer, and integrate knowledge for competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to design knowledge management systems, understand why knowledge transfer fails across teams, evaluate knowledge creation processes, or when they ask 'how do we capture tacit knowledge', 'why does knowledge stay siloed', or 'how can we turn individual expertise into organizational capability'.".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design AI knowledge management systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-knowledge-management related tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design AI knowledge management systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-knowledge-management related tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Turn an incident review into an HTML presentation covering the root cause, fix, and follow-up actions. Use a dedicated template with speaker notes to help engineering, reliability teams, and leadership discuss next steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Presenting an incident review
• Explaining a bug's root cause and fix
• Discussing systemic follow-up actions

Tencent IMA OpenAPI skill for notes and knowledge base management. Use when user mentions knowledge base, notes, memos, file uploads, web page collection, or knowledge search. Supports notes CRUD, knowledge base file upload, web link addition, and content search.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Confluence expert for spaces, knowledge bases, documentation, page layouts, macros, templates, and Jira-Confluence integration. Use for documentation strategy, space architecture, content organization, and collaborative knowledge management.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Intent-driven knowledge-store and Run knowledge lifecycle management — read-only audit/prune reports, stage candidates (with signal recording), review/resolve/promote candidates, harvest artifacts, or manage wiki/domain knowledge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Interactive Archon integration for knowledge base and project management via REST API. On first use, asks for Archon host URL. Use when searching documentation, managing projects/tasks, or querying indexed knowledge. Provides RAG-powered semantic search, website crawling, document upload, hierarchical project/task management, and document versioning. Always try Archon first for external documentation and knowledge retrieval before using other sources.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Obsidian Claw is an ontology-building skill that transforms chaotic notes, raw ideas, voice dumps, and meeting transcripts into a structured, interlinked knowledge base inside Obsidian. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: add new notes to their Obsidian vault and auto-link them to existing ones, build a concept graph or knowledge map, surface forgotten related discussions ("you talked about this with investor X 3 months ago"), extract entities and relationships from unstructured text, or turn scattered thoughts into wiki-style atomic notes. Also trigger when the user mentions "second brain", "Zettelkasten", "PKM", "personal knowledge management", "note graph", "knowledge graph", "link my notes", "organize my vault", "connect ideas", or asks Claude to "remember" something across sessions using Obsidian. If the user is doing anything with Obsidian notes and wants intelligence layered on top, use this skill.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Interactive Archon integration for knowledge base and project management via REST API. On first use, asks for Archon host URL. Use when searching documentation, managing projects/tasks, or querying indexed knowledge. Provides RAG-powered semantic search, website crawling, document upload, hierarchical project/task management, and document versioning. Always try Archon first for external documentation and knowledge retrieval before using other sources.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 (NIST AI 100-1). Use for AI risk management, trustworthiness characteristics, GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE functions, bias management, AI actor roles, TEVV, AI RMF profiles, and socio-technical risk framing. Does not cover sector-specific regulations, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 in depth, or the AI RMF Playbook tactical detail.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-61B, the DoD Configuration Management (CM) guidance handbook (7 April 2020, cataloged with Change 1, 2025). Use for defense CM across the acquisition and sustainment life cycle: the five CM functions (planning, identification, control/change management, status accounting, verification & audit), the three configuration baselines (FBL/ABL/PBL) and FCD→ACD→PCD documentation, configuration items (CIs/HWCI/CSCI), change instruments (ECP/NOR/RFV), the CCB and Class I/II classification, CDCA/AA authority, FCA/PCA audits, data management and data rights (CDRL/DID, DFARS rights ladder, master/authoritative source), and tailoring CM by phase (EIA-649-1 R/T/NR matrix, Appendix C templates), plus digital-era CM (digital twin, viewpoints, MOSA). NOTE: 61B is advisory guidance that adopts and points to the SAE EIA-649 / EIA-649-1 / GEIA-HB-649 suite for the authoritative CM requirements — this pack names and describes that suite but does not reproduce its copyrighted requirement text. Thin on: the EIA-649 requirement clauses themselves, form-level detail (DD-form field instructions, full DID content), and non-DoD/commercial CM frameworks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from the NASA Fault Management Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1002, Draft 2, April 2012). Use for the systems-engineering discipline of designing what a system does when it fails — the fault/failure/anomaly vocabulary, the five FM strategies (two prevention strategies — design-time fault avoidance and operational failure avoidance — plus three tolerance strategies — failure masking, failure recovery, and goal change), the six FM process activities across NASA mission phases Pre-A to E, response-latency-versus-time-to-criticality (TTC) design trades, fault/failure containment regions and FEPPs, the four redundancy approaches, top-down FM requirements development, FM verification vs. validation, the seven dedicated FM milestone reviews (FMCR/FMARR/FMPDR/FMCDR/FMTRR/FMLRR/FMCERR), FM organizational structure, and mined NASA Lessons Learned. Space-mission oriented (flight/ground/operations); spacecraft examples throughout. IMPORTANT: built from an UNAPPROVED DRAFT — several sections (detailed architecture building blocks, the Assessment & Analysis guidance, and Operations & Maintenance) are placeholders in the source and are thin here. Thin on detailed FDIR algorithms, terrestrial/IT fault management, and any approved-standard terminology that may have changed since Draft 2.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Knowledge graph and smart memory management using graphify + Obsidian-inspired patterns. Use when: setting up a knowledge graph, managing memory health, cross-linking notes, compiling wiki pages from scattered notes, adding structured frontmatter, or running memory health checks. Triggers on: 'knowledge graph', 'graphify', 'wiki', 'cross-link', 'memory health', 'frontmatter', 'compile notes', 'wikilinks'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Help Claude interpret workplace shorthand by storing people, acronyms, project names, and preferences in local files. Keep frequent references in CLAUDE.md and detailed context in memory/, so requests can be understood using recorded workplace knowledge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Recording internal acronyms and terminology
• Linking nicknames to people and roles
• Looking up project codenames and background

Create and review company procedures and operational guides, then audit internal wikis for outdated pages, missing owners, broken connections, and inconsistent terminology. Produce structured drafts, step checks, and a prioritized list of documents to improve.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Drafting procedures for employee onboarding
• Checking operational guides before use
• Prioritizing outdated wiki pages for revision