“research rigor”的搜索结果

Develop a research question, search and verify literature, and combine findings into an academic report. Modes also support guided research discussions, claim checking, paper comparisons, and systematic reviews with optional meta-analysis, which statistically combines study results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Clarify a research direction through guided questions
• Search literature and compare findings across sources
• Check specific claims against supporting sources

Review Agent-Native Research Artifacts, structured research packages for agents, across six dimensions of research quality. Produce a JSON report with scores, strengths, severity-ranked findings, practical improvements, and an overall acceptance or rejection recommendation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Reviewing an ARA before publication
• Checking whether evidence supports research claims
• Assessing experimental methods and research records

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Conduct rigorous, citation-backed desk market research: quick go/no-go market scans, market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), competitor analysis, customer demand signals, and trend/macro (PESTEL) analysis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to research, size, validate, or enter a market — "is there a market for…", "how big is the market for…", "who are the competitors of…", "should I build/launch/sell…", "validate this business idea", "market research for…", "market entry" — in any language and for any country's market (e.g. "nghiên cứu thị trường", "étude de marché", "市場調査", "análisis de mercado"), even when the user never says the words "market research". Also use it when another skill or workflow (strategy-board, design-thinking, a product brief) needs external market facts delivered into its fact base or research folder.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Structure and revise investment research into readable Markdown reports for Codex. Explain business economics, competitive advantages, opposing arguments, and valuation, then connect the evidence to price bands and actions for prospective investors and existing holders.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Restructure a lengthy investment research report
• Explain how a company earns money and sustains its advantages
• Strengthen a report's bear case and observable risk indicators

Researches a company’s business, competitive advantages, management, and risks through a value investing framework. Cross-checks financial data and calculates valuation scenarios to produce a sourced report with price ranges, conclusions, and clearly stated uncertainties.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Researching a company before investing
• Assessing competitive advantages and management
• Comparing valuation scenarios

Research a listed company's business quality and valuation using official filings, comparisons with similar companies, and historical performance. Produce an evidence-backed report and scorecard, with separate modes for accounting concerns and companies preparing for an IPO.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare a company's financial strength with sector peers
• Investigate gaps between reported profit and cash flow
• Assess assumptions built into a stock's current price

Rapidly maps the evidence landscape around a medical topic by organizing major research streams, target populations, endpoints, methods, evidence density, and thin areas. Use this skill BEFORE medical-research-gap-finder — it provides the structured landscape that makes formal gap analysis more rigorous. Do not use for formal gap identification, study design, or protocol planning directly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Computer Architecture Researcher. Use when a task calls for Computer Architecture Researcher judgment. Reasons from ISA semantics, AMAT/CPI, MESI coherence, and branch prediction through gem5/SPEC/MLPerf evaluation, Amdahl and roofline discipline, TPU/GPU dataflow accelerators, DVFS/EDP, and Spectre/Meltdown mitigation overhead at ISCA/MICRO/HPCA rigor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Break down major industrial trends into materials, components, and equipment to find listed suppliers at supply bottlenecks. Compare scarcity, financial performance, and valuation, then organize candidates into a ranked research board with supporting evidence and risks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Find overlooked suppliers benefiting from AI infrastructure growth
• Compare supply constraints in energy transition supply chains
• Check valuations of companies at critical supply bottlenecks

Develop an eight-part article series examining one company's competitive strengths, earnings, assets, management, and valuation. Review figures, sources, accounting definitions, and claims across the series to prepare consistent articles for public publication.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Planning an eight-part company analysis series
• Checking figures and definitions across articles
• Revising unsupported claims before publication

Approach engineering problems by checking assumptions, defining performance constraints, and choosing suitable tools before implementation. The skill guides algorithm analysis, complete code, performance optimization, and correctness checks through tests, assertions, or formal verification, meaning mathematical checks of correctness.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking algorithm complexity and design assumptions
• Choosing languages for numerical or distributed systems
• Implementing concurrent code with explicit error handling

Review mathematical proofs in LaTeX for logical gaps, missing assumptions, and unjustified steps. Attempt counterexamples, develop explicit repairs, and repeat the review, producing an audit report that distinguishes completed fixes from assumptions and unresolved proof obligations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking theorem assumptions and logical dependencies
• Finding counterexamples to key lemmas
• Repairing missing derivations in LaTeX proofs

Check mathematical proofs in LaTeX with review by a separate AI model. Identify missing assumptions and unsupported steps, explore counterexamples, repair derivations, and keep an audit record of issues, changes, and follow-up reviews.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking proofs in a theory paper
• Finding missing assumptions in lemmas
• Repairing gaps in mathematical derivations

Analyze company earnings from four perspectives: business performance, financial quality, competition, and risk. Combine the findings into a research report, then edit and review an accessible article for a WeChat official account.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Examine a key quarterly or annual earnings release
• Compare profits with cash flow
• Track management promises and risk signals

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "generate scientific figures", "check significance", "do ablation analysis", or mentions interpreting experiment data with rigorous statistics and visualization. It focuses on strict analysis bundles, not Results-section prose.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work across quality dimensions (novelty, rigor, significance, and clarity). Use to critique academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, or grant applications and produce a structured, criterion-based assessment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Detects methodological gaps across study design, analysis, validation, bias control, reproducibility, and implementation readiness within a biomedical research area. Use this skill when a user wants to identify what current studies are still methodologically missing, which weaknesses are most consequential, and what upgrade path would produce a stronger next-step study. Always separate design gaps, analysis gaps, validation gaps, and reproducibility gaps. Never treat technical complexity as methodological rigor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。