Evaluate AI agent outputs with code checks and model-based grading. Run repeated trials to measure reliability, compare prompts or models, and check whether changes reduce quality, with saved transcripts for reviewing the results.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
- Comparing two prompts on the same test cases
- Checking quality after agent configuration changes
- Turning real failures into repeatable evaluation cases
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 2万2026年9月4日 更新
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills☆ 16512026年8月8日 更新
Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
rohitg00/skillkit☆ 15572026年6月2日 更新
Systematic debugging methodology - scientific method, hypothesis testing, and root cause analysis that works across all technologiesUse when "bug, debugging, not working, broken, investigate, root cause, why is this happening, figure out, troubleshoot, doesn't work, unexpected behavior, debugging, root-cause, hypothesis, scientific-method, troubleshooting, bug-hunting, investigation, problem-solving" mentioned.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity☆ 1682026年1月22日 更新