74 个 · 按相关度排序
Set up, index, and manage SocratiCode codebase indexing. Use when the user wants to index a project, check infrastructure health, start/stop file watching, configure context artifacts, troubleshoot indexing issues, manage the code graph, or any SocratiCode administrative task. Activates when the user mentions indexing, setting up search, SocratiCode infrastructure, or managing the codebase index.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Practice legal reasoning through hypothetical cases and follow-up questions. The skill challenges weak explanations, tracks recurring mistakes, and prompts you to work out the answer yourself, confirming your reasoning once you reach a sound conclusion.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Explore and understand codebases using SocratiCode semantic search, dependency graphs, and context artifacts. Use when exploring code, understanding architecture, finding functions/types, analysing dependencies, searching database schemas or API specs, or when socraticode/codebase_search tools are available. Activates when the user asks about code structure, wants to find where a feature lives, or needs to understand how code is organised.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate a Socratic questioning sequence that develops conceptual understanding through guided inquiry. Use when facilitating philosophical discussions, concept exploration, or critical examination.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate a Socratic questioning sequence that develops conceptual understanding through guided inquiry. Use when facilitating philosophical discussions, concept exploration, or critical examination.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Socratic questioning partner named Gadfly for deep learning through dialogue. Use this skill when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a topic through questions rather than explanations. Trigger when the user says "teach me about...", "help me understand...", "I want to learn...", "ask me questions about...", "quiz me", "Socratic method", "Gadfly", or wants to deeply understand something through dialogue rather than passive reading. Also trigger when the user provides a text or document and wants to be questioned about it, or wants to check their own understanding of a concept.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Develop a research question, search and verify literature, and combine findings into an academic report. Modes also support guided research discussions, claim checking, paper comparisons, and systematic reviews with optional meta-analysis, which statistically combines study results.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Help junior developers and AI newcomers understand code through guided questions and progressive hints. Support debugging, concept learning, and critical review of AI-generated code so learners can explain their reasoning and work toward solutions themselves.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Develop a research question, search and verify literature, combine findings, and produce a structured report. Seven modes cover guided research discussions, briefs, literature reviews, fact-checking, and systematic reviews, with statistical pooling of study results when appropriate.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Design a multi-round questioning sequence for interrogating AI chatbot answers, tracking how responses shift and distinguishing genuine updates from sycophantic capitulation. Use when teaching students to probe AI critically.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides project ideation via Socratic questioning to produce a validated brief. Use before specification when requirements are unclear.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Socratic method teaching skill that guides users to discover answers themselves through questioning, never giving direct answers. TRIGGER when: user's message contains 'socratic', 'Socrates', or '소크라테스'. Works with any knowledge asset — codebases, markdown files, PDFs, documentation, configs, or any readable content. Respond in the user's language.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a multi-round questioning sequence for interrogating AI chatbot answers, tracking how responses shift and distinguishing genuine updates from sycophantic capitulation. Use when teaching students to probe AI critically.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Socratic code review and refactoring session — whether it's your own code, a teammate's PR, or something you inherited. Leads you to see the issues through questions, names smells and moves precisely, then closes with a concrete plan.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks for deep or academic research — a literature review, PRISMA systematic review or meta-analysis, fact-check, evidence synthesis, APA 7 research report, or Socratic guidance to sharpen a vague research question. Runs a 13-agent pipeline with full, quick, review, lit-review, fact-check, socratic, and systematic-review modes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the learner benefits from guided questioning to build reasoning and uncover misconceptions before receiving direct answers.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Socratic mentoring for junior developers and AI newcomers. Guides through questions, never answers. Triggers: "help me understand", "explain this code", "I'm stuck", "Im stuck", "I'm confused", "Im confused", "I don't understand", "I dont understand", "can you teach me", "teach me", "mentor me", "guide me", "what does this error mean", "why doesn't this work", "why does not this work", "I'm a beginner", "Im a beginner", "I'm learning", "Im learning", "I'm new to this", "Im new to this", "walk me through", "how does this work", "what's wrong with my code", "what's wrong", "can you break this down", "ELI5", "step by step", "where do I start", "what am I missing", "newbie here", "junior dev", "first time using", "how do I", "what is", "is this right", "not sure", "need help", "struggling", "show me", "help me debug", "best practice", "too complex", "overwhelmed", "lost", "debug this", "/socratic", "/hint", "/concept", "/pseudocode". Progressive clue systems, teaching techniques, and success metrics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Revisit a recent answer, plan, draft, or decision using selected critique methods. The skill offers relevant approaches, explains what they reveal, and proposes improvements that are applied only after the user accepts them.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Simulate peer review through five perspectives covering journal fit, methods, subject expertise, interdisciplinary implications, and counterarguments. Receive separate review reports, an editorial decision, and a revision roadmap, or check whether revisions address earlier comments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Build learning activities where learners explain an idea first, then improve their explanation through focused questions. Include plain language, checks on analogies, application to unfamiliar situations, and a record of remaining gaps and next goals.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。