跳到正文
cccskills

“task arithmetic”的搜索结果

10 个 · 按相关度排序

Combine capabilities from multiple fine-tuned LLMs without retraining using mergekit. Choose a merging method, configure how models are blended, and evaluate the resulting model on tasks such as math, code generation, and conversation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Combining math, coding, and conversation capabilities
  • Blending two models at different ratios
  • Comparing variants made with different merging methods
davila7/claude-code-templates3.3万2026年10月18日 更新

Combine specialized language models without retraining using mergekit. The skill explains how to choose merging methods, configure each model’s contribution, compare resulting variants, and prepare a merged model for evaluation and deployment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Combine math, coding, and conversation capabilities
  • Compare model variants with different merge weights
  • Choose a method for merging several models
Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs1.4万2026年10月11日 更新

Mescle múltiplos modelos ajustados usando mergekit para combinar capacidades sem retreinar. Use ao criar modelos especializados misturando expertise específica de domínio (math + coding + chat), melhorando performance além de modelos únicos, ou experimentando rapidamente variantes de modelos. Cobre SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, mesclagem linear e estratégias de deploy em produção.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

artubss/SKILLS-CLAUDE-CODE112026年5月17日 更新

Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, linear merging, and production deployment strategies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

sympy

免费

Use SymPy to simplify expressions, solve equations, and calculate derivatives, integrals, and matrices with exact symbolic results. Specify assumptions, verify solutions, and turn mathematical expressions into numerical functions, source code, or LaTeX output.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Solving equations and checking their solutions
  • Calculating symbolic derivatives, integrals, and limits
  • Finding matrix eigenvalues with exact arithmetic
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills5.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Create, edit, and inspect spreadsheets for reusable budgets, models, and trackers. Check formulas and dependent totals, preserve unrelated data, and deliver an editable workbook or a link to the updated native spreadsheet.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Build a monthly headcount budget
  • Investigate an incorrect quarterly total
  • Fix formulas and highlight changed cells
asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks7万2026年10月16日 更新

Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17792026年8月27日 更新

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

agentsope/SkillAlchemy4352026年10月9日 更新

Think and work like an expert Algorithms Researcher. Use when a task calls for Algorithms Researcher judgment. Reasons from separating problem, model, and cost model (comparison, word-RAM, arithmetic, online) through exchange/matroid greedy proofs, subproblem-DAG dynamic programming, max-flow min-cut and Goemans–Williamson primal-dual rounding, Karp–Rabin fingerprinting, competitive ratio and Yao's principle, PTAS/FPTAS (Williamson–Shmoys), and Instance Space Analysis over DIMACS10/MIPLIB 2017/SuiteSparse while treating amortized-versus-average-case conflation, unproven greedy killed by a 4-node counterexample, Monte Carlo without a false-match probability, DIMACS10 suite overfitting, and 'linear time' hiding word-size tricks over bit-length L as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents2182026年10月3日 更新

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Chemistry Teacher — grading a lab report where the numeric result misses the "expected" value but the methodology is sound, distinguishing a conceptual misunderstanding from an arithmetic slip on a problem set, deciding how much procedural freedom to give students on an open-ended lab, or vetting whether a demo/lab procedure is safe to run in this specific room.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wonsukchoi/domain-experts222026年10月19日 更新