1178 个 · 按相关度排序
Automate Battlenet operations through Rube MCP, a connection for agent tools. Discover which actions are available, check the service connection, and execute tasks with the input fields and types returned by tool search.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Automate Battlenet operations through Rube MCP, a connection for agent tools. Discover which actions are available, check the service connection, and execute tasks with the input fields and types returned by tool search.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Break down major industrial trends into materials, components, and equipment to find listed suppliers at supply bottlenecks. Compare scarcity, financial performance, and valuation, then organize candidates into a ranked research board with supporting evidence and risks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review frequent JavaScript events and apply debounce, which waits until activity stops, or throttle, which limits execution frequency. Identify handlers causing sluggish interfaces or excessive API calls, and define browser checks for the fixes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
古人说唱 Battle：把两个历史上的死对头（诸葛亮 vs 司马懿、岳飞 vs 秦桧……）做成一条 AI 说唱对决短视频，从选题写词（每句配史料注释）、Suno 做歌、Midjourney 定妆、即梦 Seedance 2.5 网页版分段生成（提示词按半句精确到 0.01 秒写歌词，口型一次对好），到自动逐镜头对齐、拼接、字幕包装、封面和发布文案一条龙。用户说"做一期 A vs B"、"古人说唱 battle"、"历史人物说唱"、"rap battle 视频"，或者要改已有一期的歌词、镜头、字幕、封面时使用。Make an AI rap-battle short between two historical rivals, end to end, with Seedance 2.5 (or MiniMax H3).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analyze competitors using deal outcomes, customer quotes, and public developments. Prepare tactics for a specific deal, battlecards—sales reference sheets for each competitor—and weekly updates that distinguish evidence from interpretation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Map repeatable business processes by owner and analyze time spent working, waiting, or reworking. Using stage-level timing data, produce a process diagram, ranked bottlenecks, and cycle-time measures to focus improvements on the main constraint.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Work out whether you're eligible for a class-action settlement or refund program — and actually file the claim before the deadline. Use when asked am I owed money from a settlement, is there a class action for [product/company], how do I claim a settlement, or did I qualify for that refund. Produces a way to check for relevant settlements, an eligibility read against the class definition, the proof you need and how to file, deadline tracking, and honest expectations on payout size — plus how to avoid fake-settlement scams. Not legal advice.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generates and maintains competitive battlecards from win/loss data, competitor intel, G2 reviews, and sales feedback. Use when building battlecards for a specific competitor, updating existing battlecards with new intel, preparing BDRs or AEs for competitive deals, analyzing win/loss patterns against a competitor, or responding to a competitor's product launch or pricing change. Also use when asked to "build a battlecard," "update competitive intel," "how do we beat [competitor]," "what do we say when a prospect mentions [competitor]," or "analyze our win/loss against [competitor]." Designed for B2B SaaS teams selling against known competitors in deals with multi-persona buying committees.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Manage cached LLM responses, which are saved answers available for reuse. Inspect statistics and stored entries, clear cached data, and configure expiration policies and similarity thresholds that govern when answers can be reused.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Investigate slow TPU training on GKE by comparing diagnostic events with one-minute monitoring metrics. Separate memory or CPU bottlenecks from hardware and network issues, and identify the appropriate next steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Investigate failing or slow BigQuery jobs and unexpected cost increases. Compare execution details and resource usage with a normal baseline to isolate bottlenecks, identify likely causes, and determine practical remediation steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Check active PUA agents and teams from Codex CLI using an alias for the Claude Code status command. Review process IDs and record lifetimes when available, alongside stale records.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Investigate supply shortages behind growing industries by tracing components, materials, and equipment. Compare related listed companies using financial data, valuation checks, and opposing evidence, then organize bottleneck maps and watchlists for further investment research.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
This skill stress-tests a proposed settlement position before an offer goes out or comes back: the assumptions it depends on, your leverage and the opponent’s, the evidential weaknesses, the likely opponent response, and the timing and costs pressures around it. It structures settlement judgment for a better-informed decision; it does not advise whether to settle.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use this skill whenever a lawyer or mediator needs help analyzing a dispute for mediation purposes. This includes: reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence) to identify issues in dispute, summarizing each party's position and interests, conducting legal analysis of the key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Trigger this skill when the user mentions 'mediation', 'dispute analysis', 'settlement', 'dispute resolution', 'identify issues in dispute', 'party positions', 'mediation brief', 'case analysis for mediation', 'ADR', 'mediation preparation', 'caucus strategy', 'settlement options', or any request to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with the goal of finding resolution. Also trigger when the user uploads case files and asks for a structured breakdown of who wants what, what the core disagreements are, or how the case might settle. Even if the user doesn't explicitly say 'mediation', trigger when the context involves analyzing opposing positions in a dispute with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Produces structured summaries of U.S. divorce settlement agreements (MSAs), extracting material terms across property, custody, support, taxes, insurance, fees, and deadlines. Triggers on requests for divorce settlement summary, MSA summary, marital settlement agreement, property division, child custody, parenting plan, child support, or alimony extraction.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Total-loss determination and settlement pricing. Triggers: "total loss valuation", "claims value", "settlement offer", "salvage estimate", "insurance claim pricing", "total loss threshold", "what's the claim worth", "settlement range", "pre-loss value", "diminished value", "total loss determination", insurance claim vehicle valuation, total-loss determination, settlement pricing, or salvage value estimation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Coordinates loan trading with LSTA standard documentation, delayed settlement compensation, and trade settlement mechanics. Use when managing loan trades, processing LSTA documentation, or coordinating trade settlement.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluates settlement risk in cross-border transactions with time zone analysis, CLS participation, and Herstatt risk mitigation. Use when managing settlement risk, analyzing CLS eligibility, or evaluating cross-currency settlement.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Drafts time-limited policy-limits demand letters that create an opportunity-to-settle record for third-party bad faith exposure. Use when the user mentions time-limited demand, policy limits demand, bad faith notice, Stowers demand, civil remedy notice, failure to settle demand, excess exposure letter, insurer settlement opportunity, or needs help with acceptance mechanics for a policy-limits offer. Also trigger for Georgia O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67.1 compliance, Florida statutory bad faith prerequisites, or documenting insurer refusal to settle.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
One-question-at-a-time design interrogation. Use when: 'grill me', 'interrogate this', 'one question at a time', 'brainstorm', 'let's brainstorm', 'let's discuss', 'lets discuss', 'discuss', 'walk me through', or design review start. Produces ADRs and glossary as decisions settle. Use for unsettled designs; for settled designs go straight to architecture-mode. When the design is unsettled and also has high ambiguity, several technical approaches, or security/data risk, load architecture-mode alongside.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。