Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use fresh agents for focused subtasks to avoid context pollution
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
FRESH AGENT = FRESH CONTEXT
Use subagents for focused work without baggage
| Situation | Why Subagent Helps |
|---|---|
| Complex subtask | Focused context, clear scope |
| Going in circles | Fresh perspective breaks loops |
| Parallel work | Multiple things at once |
| Context pollution | Main agent too cluttered |
| Specialized task | Pass only relevant info |
| Research/exploration | Keep main context clean |
The Handoff:
1. DEFINE clear scope - what exactly to do
2. PROVIDE needed context - files, constraints, requirements
3. SPECIFY deliverable - what to return
4. SET success criteria - how to know it's done
Template:
Task: [Specific action to take]
Context:
- Working in [repo/directory]
- Relevant files: [list]
- Constraints: [any limits]
Deliverable:
- [Exact output expected]
Success when:
- [Criteria 1]
- [Criteria 2]
❌ Vague handoffs
Bad: "Look into this bug"
Good: "Find root cause of TypeError in user.ts:45"
❌ Context dumping
Bad: Passing entire conversation history
Good: Passing only relevant files and specific question
❌ No success criteria
Bad: "Make it better"
Good: "Refactor to reduce duplication, all tests must pass"
❌ Too broad scope
Bad: "Implement the whole feature"
Good: "Implement the validation logic for email field"
✅ Research:
✅ Focused fixes:
✅ Generation:
✅ Analysis:
When subagent returns:
1. READ the full response
2. VERIFY against success criteria
3. INTEGRATE results into main context
4. CONTINUE from where you left off
Before launching subagent:
scope-boundary-checker → Is scope clear and bounded?assumption-checker → Are handoff assumptions valid?After receiving results:
fact-checker → Verify subagent claimspre-action-verifier → Before using resultsMain agent responsibilities:
Subagent responsibilities:
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Transform rough ideas into solid designs through structured questioning
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Canvas API Connection Skill
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Forces every code-related claim to include file:line citations. No citation means the claim must be verified or removed. Use when building documentation, writing code reviews, or any output that others will rely on.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Assign confidence scores (0-100) to every claim in a response. Helps users understand which parts are verified facts and which are educated guesses. Use when the user needs to know how much to trust each part of the answer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Forces Claude to extract exact quotes from files before making claims about them. Prevents hallucinations by grounding every statement in actual text from the codebase. Use when working with large files or unfamiliar code.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。