跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

launch-readiness-auditor

Audit a launch at one stage: preparation, execution, or outcomes. Review evidence for that stage, identify missing information and critical failures, and receive a verdict without combining planned work, observed operations, and actual results into one score.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Use when the user asks to "audit our launch plan", "are we ready to launch", or evaluate launch execution/outcomes; runs one typed RAMP preflight, execution, or outcome profile without mixing time horizons. Not for recording launch state — use launch-registry; not for running launch day — use launch-day-conductor. 发布就绪审计/RAMP分阶段评估/发布前放行

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Assess readiness before a product or service announcement
  • Review actual operations during a launch
  • Evaluate results after the declared waiting period
  • Identify missing evidence and fixes before reassessment

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • references/auditor-runtime.md15.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Launch Readiness Auditor

Audit one launch at one lifecycle read. Preflight evaluates readiness/assets plus planned policy and instrumentation red lines; execution evaluates observed launch-window operation; outcome evaluates post-lag proof. There is no cross-time composite.

When This Must Trigger

  • Before a committed launch/announcement when go/no-go evidence is needed.
  • During/after the launch window when execution quality must be assessed.
  • After the declared lag when actual outcomes and learnings are reviewed.

Quick Start

Run RAMP preflight for launch alpha against the registry stage, canon, claims, rules, and event QA.
Run the outcome profile at day 30; keep it separate from the preflight result.

Skill Contract

Reads: one launch, one lifecycle read, registry/canon/claims state, and profile-specific evidence. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: the selected profile is complete or its exact Unknowns are reported, with no launch execution or registry mutation.

launch-registry owns stage/date/embargo facts. launch-day-conductor executes the runbook. This auditor only judges the frozen evidence.

Data Sources

NeedPreferred evidence
Stage/accessProjected launch record plus direct access/eligibility check
Narrative/claimsCanon version, claims projection, rendered assets
Operations/rulesLaunch plan, commitments, dated official platform rules
InstrumentationVerified events/UTMs and destination truth checks
ExecutionTimestamped action/incident/response evidence
OutcomesOwn analytics/CRM/store truth after declared lag

Instructions

Runtime Reads

  • ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md
  • ../../../references/scoring-semantics.md
  • ../../../references/ramp-benchmark.md
  • ../../../references/runtime-invocation.md
  • references/auditor-runtime.md

Runtime and Setup

Read ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, ramp-benchmark.md, and the RAMP catalog entry. Standalone installs use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.

Declare profile/lifecycle read (preflight|execution|outcome), target launch, launch type, market, access model, observation date, and evidence window.

Profile Procedure

  • Preflight: score R1–R10, A1–A10, planned M1, and P1. A public pricing page is required only when the declared access model promises public paid availability.
  • Execution: score observed M1–M10; do not substitute planned runbook quality for actual execution.
  • Outcome: score P2–P10 after the declared lag; do not backfill forecast targets as actuals.

Every observed state needs source/date/type/confidence. Missing applicable evidence is Unknown; catalog-authorized conditional items may be N/A with reason. Run python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json> on the selected typed profile.

Verify profile-relevant vetoes: RAMP-R1 stage/access contradiction, RAMP-A1 material claim/disclosure failure, RAMP-M1 planned or observed manipulation/embargo/platform violation, and RAMP-P1 demonstrably broken instrumentation on participating surfaces.

§2 RAMP Worked Examples

  • Complete preflight, raw 80, no veto/fail: DONE/SHIP, final 80.
  • Complete preflight, raw 76, one verified A1 failure: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.
  • Complete preflight, verified R1 and M1 failures: DONE/BLOCK, no final score.
  • Outcome read before conversion lag or without own-data actuals: NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED, no score.

§3 RAMP Guardrails

  • Stage truth follows promised access/eligibility; a pricing page is not universal evidence of GA.
  • A genuine feedback request is not vote solicitation.
  • Privacy-limited modeled measurement may be Partial; broken required instrumentation is P1 Fail.
  • Launch stacking/capacity is an M10 finding, not an automatic veto.
  • Never average preflight, execution, and outcome profiles or compare their scores as the same construct.

§5 RAMP Translation

State lifecycle read with every result. On trace request, qualify RAMP-R1/A1/M1/P1, especially against colliding ROAS IDs.

Report and Verdict

Begin with the auditor-runbook's exact typed conversation header. Never replace status, verdict, or score_state with prose; list each explicitly missing qualified item as ``ID: unknown``` before findings. Use the stable catalog ID verbatim (for example, RAMP-R1); never substitute an evidence-subcheck label or synthesize a suffixed ID such as RAMP-R1d`.

Lead with lifecycle-specific verdict, target/context/date, score or coverage/interval, confidence, profile detail, linked prior reads, critical evidence, Unknowns, and fix/rerun owner. A preflight SHIP authorizes no external launch action by itself; explicit execution approval remains required.

Validation Checkpoints

  • One launch and one lifecycle profile are declared.
  • Plan, execution, and outcome evidence were not mixed.
  • Expected items only are scored; Unknown/N/A semantics are correct.
  • Stage/access, policy, claims, and instrumentation vetoes are positively verified.
  • No launch, submission, registry, or campaign side effect occurred.

Persistence

Persist only after explicit authorization to memory/audits/launch/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md. Preserve the scorer's orthogonal status and verdict; validate the complete v3 draft with validate-audit-artifact.py against the intended relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target per the auditor runbook. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Create separate files for separate lifecycle reads and link them by launch ID rather than overwriting.

Reference Materials

Next Best Skill

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Audit paid advertising accounts before increasing spend by comparing campaign exports with your own sales or lead records. Review 20 criteria covering measurement, spending, and safety, then receive a decision and prioritized fixes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review an ad account before increasing its budget
  • Check reported ad returns against sales and lead records
  • Identify wasted spend and prioritize measurement fixes
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills30132026年10月25日 更新

Create paid-ad headlines, descriptions, and opening hooks that match the destination page. Build a matrix of messaging angles and variants, check format limits, and flag unsupported claims or policy risks before handing the set off for review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Drafting responsive search ad headlines and descriptions
  • Comparing ad angles and opening hooks
  • Replacing weak headlines while keeping successful ones
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills30132026年10月25日 更新

Plan advertising and landing page experiments with a clear hypothesis, controlled variants, sample sizes, and duration. Interpret exported results by separating statistical evidence from meaningful business impact, applying an action rule only when its owner approved it in advance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Plan an A/B test for landing page headlines
  • Estimate sample size and duration for an ad test
  • Assess effect size and uncertainty in exported test results
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills30132026年10月25日 更新

Design employee and founder sharing programs with voluntary participation, personalized share kits, disclosure lines, and staggered posting windows. Get roster and Slack or Teams distribution specifications, plus safeguards against identical coordinated posts and organized engagement exchanges.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing a voluntary employee sharing program
  • Preparing personalized launch share kits
  • Planning founder posts and disclosure lines
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills30132026年10月25日 更新

Reconcile paid advertising conversions with GA4 or ecommerce order records. Identify duplicate and unmatched claims, align attribution windows and currencies, compare how models assign credit, and assess additional orders when test and control data are available.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Find sales claimed by both Meta and Google
  • Build a monthly conversion reconciliation workbook
  • Compare results across attribution models
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills30132026年10月25日 更新

Turn customer interviews and won or lost deal notes into a map of buyer beliefs, recurring objections, and reasons to switch or stay. Each finding includes its evidence, with suggested ways to address objections and clear labels for assumptions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map buyer beliefs from customer interviews
  • Organize recurring sales objections and response angles
  • Identify reasons buyers switch or stay
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills30132026年10月25日 更新

查看 aaron-he-zhu 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题