Patterns for building entity actors with Akka.Hosting - GenericChildPerEntityParent, message extractors, cluster sharding abstraction, akka-reminders, and ITimeProvider. Supports both local testing and clustered production modes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Snapshot test email templates using Verify to catch regressions. Validates rendered HTML output matches approved baseline. Works with MJML templates and any email renderer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this skill when:
Related skills:
aspnetcore/mjml-email-templates - MJML template authoringaspire/mailpit-integration - Test email delivery locallytesting/snapshot-testing - General Verify patternsEmail templates are:
Snapshot testing captures the rendered HTML and fails when it changes unexpectedly.
dotnet add package Verify.Xunit # or Verify.NUnit, Verify.MSTest
[Fact]
public async Task UserSignupInvitation_RendersCorrectly()
{
// Arrange
var renderer = _services.GetRequiredService<IMjmlTemplateRenderer>();
var variables = new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{ "PreviewText", "You've been invited to join Acme Corp" },
{ "OrganizationName", "Acme Corporation" },
{ "InviteeName", "John Doe" },
{ "InviterName", "Jane Admin" },
{ "InvitationLink", "https://example.com/invite/abc123" },
{ "ExpirationDate", "December 31, 2025" }
};
// Act
var html = await renderer.RenderTemplateAsync(
"UserInvitations/UserSignupInvitation",
variables);
// Assert
await Verify(html, extension: "html");
}
This creates UserSignupInvitation_RendersCorrectly.verified.html on first run.
When a template changes, the test fails with a diff. Review options:
# Configure diff tool (one-time)
dotnet tool install -g verify.tool
verify accept # Accept all pending changes
verify review # Open diff tool
Open the .received.html file in a browser to see the actual rendering.
Most IDEs show inline diffs for .verified.html vs .received.html files.
Create tests for each email template to catch regressions:
public class EmailTemplateSnapshotTests : IClassFixture<EmailTestFixture>
{
private readonly IMjmlTemplateRenderer _renderer;
public EmailTemplateSnapshotTests(EmailTestFixture fixture)
{
_renderer = fixture.Services.GetRequiredService<IMjmlTemplateRenderer>();
}
[Fact]
public async Task WelcomeEmail_NewUser() =>
await VerifyTemplate("Welcome/NewUser", new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{ "UserName", "John Doe" },
{ "LoginUrl", "https://example.com/login" }
});
[Fact]
public async Task WelcomeEmail_InvitedUser() =>
await VerifyTemplate("Welcome/InvitedUser", new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{ "UserName", "John Doe" },
{ "InviterName", "Jane Admin" },
{ "OrganizationName", "Acme Corp" }
});
[Fact]
public async Task PasswordReset() =>
await VerifyTemplate("PasswordReset/PasswordReset", new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{ "UserName", "John Doe" },
{ "ResetLink", "https://example.com/reset/abc123" },
{ "ExpirationMinutes", "30" }
});
[Fact]
public async Task PaymentReceipt() =>
await VerifyTemplate("Billing/PaymentReceipt", new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{ "UserName", "John Doe" },
{ "Amount", "$10.00" },
{ "InvoiceNumber", "INV-2025-001" },
{ "Date", "January 15, 2025" }
});
private async Task VerifyTemplate(
string templateName,
Dictionary<string, string> variables)
{
var html = await _renderer.RenderTemplateAsync(templateName, variables);
await Verify(html, extension: "html")
.UseMethodName(templateName.Replace("/", "_"));
}
}
Some values change between test runs. Scrub them:
[Fact]
public async Task EmailWithTimestamp_ScrubsDynamicValues()
{
var html = await _renderer.RenderTemplateAsync("Welcome", variables);
await Verify(html, extension: "html")
.ScrubLinesContaining("Generated at:")
.ScrubInlineGuids(); // Scrubs GUIDs in URLs
}
// Scrub dates
.ScrubLinesContaining("Date:")
.AddScrubber(s => Regex.Replace(s, @"\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}", "SCRUBBED-DATE"))
// Scrub URLs with tokens
.AddScrubber(s => Regex.Replace(s, @"token=[a-zA-Z0-9]+", "token=SCRUBBED"))
// Scrub GUIDs
.ScrubInlineGuids()
public class EmailTestFixture : IAsyncLifetime
{
public IServiceProvider Services { get; private set; } = null!;
public async Task InitializeAsync()
{
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddSingleton<IConfiguration>(new ConfigurationBuilder()
.AddInMemoryCollection(new Dictionary<string, string?>
{
["SiteUrl"] = "https://example.com"
})
.Build());
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
Services = services.BuildServiceProvider();
await Task.CompletedTask;
}
public Task DisposeAsync() => Task.CompletedTask;
}
Test the full composer output including subject and metadata:
[Fact]
public async Task SignupInvitation_ComposesCorrectEmail()
{
var composer = _services.GetRequiredService<IUserEmailComposer>();
var email = await composer.ComposeSignupInvitationAsync(
recipientEmail: new EmailAddress("john@example.com"),
recipientName: new PersonName("John Doe"),
inviterName: new PersonName("Jane Admin"),
organizationName: new OrganizationName("Acme Corp"),
invitationUrl: new AbsoluteUri("https://example.com/invite/abc123"),
expiresAt: new DateTimeOffset(2025, 12, 31, 0, 0, 0, TimeSpan.Zero));
// Verify the full email object (subject, to, body)
await Verify(new
{
email.To,
email.Subject,
HtmlBody = email.HtmlBody // Will be stored as .html extension
});
}
In CI, fail if no .verified.html file exists (prevents accidental acceptance):
// In test setup or ModuleInitializer
VerifierSettings.ThrowOnMissingVerifiedFile();
Add to .gitattributes to improve diff handling:
*.verified.html linguist-language=HTML
*.verified.html diff=html
// DO: Test each template variant
[Fact] Task WelcomeEmail_NewUser_RendersCorrectly()
[Fact] Task WelcomeEmail_InvitedUser_RendersCorrectly()
// DO: Use descriptive test names
[Fact] Task PaymentReceipt_WithRefund_ShowsRefundAmount()
// DO: Scrub dynamic values consistently
.ScrubLinesContaining("Generated at:")
// DO: Review diffs carefully before accepting
verify review
// DON'T: Skip email testing
// DON'T: Auto-accept changes without review
verify accept --all // Dangerous!
// DON'T: Test only happy path
// DON'T: Ignore snapshot test failures
.verified.html.verified.html in source control还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Patterns for building entity actors with Akka.Hosting - GenericChildPerEntityParent, message extractors, cluster sharding abstraction, akka-reminders, and ITimeProvider. Supports both local testing and clustered production modes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Configure Akka.NET with .NET Aspire for local development and production deployments. Covers actor system setup, clustering, persistence, Akka.Management integration, and Aspire orchestration patterns.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Critical Akka.NET best practices including EventStream vs DistributedPubSub, supervision strategies, error handling, Props vs DependencyResolver, work distribution patterns, and cluster/local mode abstractions for testability.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Akka.Management for cluster bootstrapping, service discovery (Kubernetes, Azure, Config), health checks, and dynamic cluster formation without static seed nodes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write unit and integration tests for Akka.NET actors using modern Akka.Hosting.TestKit patterns. Covers dependency injection, TestProbes, persistence testing, and actor interaction verification. Includes guidance on when to use traditional TestKit.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guidelines for making .NET libraries and applications trimming-safe and Native AOT compatible. Covers the trimming/AOT model, the MSBuild properties that enable analysis (IsTrimmable, IsAotCompatible, PublishTrimmed, PublishAot), the trimming attributes (RequiresUnreferencedCode, RequiresDynamicCode, DynamicallyAccessedMembers, UnconditionalSuppressMessage), IL2xxx/IL3xxx warning codes, and a pattern playbook: source generators and UnsafeAccessor, generated-interception diagnostic suppressors, intentional runtime scanning boundaries, trimming-safe islands and feature switches, migration analyzers, and temporary warning-approval baselines. Use when introducing trimming/AOT support, resolving IL2xxx/IL3xxx warnings, or making reflection-heavy code trimming-safe in C# / .NET codebases. For System.Text.Json AOT scenarios, see also the serialization skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。