跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

frontend-ui-engineering

遵循现有设计体系,实现适用于手机到大屏幕的界面。整理组件结构与状态管理,支持键盘操作和屏幕阅读器,并完善加载中、无数据及错误状态的显示。

原文查看原文说明

Builds production-quality, accessible, responsive user-facing UIs. Use when building or modifying interfaces and pages, creating components, implementing layouts, meeting WCAG accessibility requirements, managing state, or when the output needs to look and feel production-quality rather than AI-generated.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 创建新页面或界面组件
  • 调整手机和电脑上的显示
  • 改善键盘及屏幕阅读器支持
  • 添加加载中、空数据和错误状态

中文介绍

功能

实现兼顾外观、操作体验和无障碍使用的页面与界面组件。无障碍使用是指通过键盘或屏幕阅读器等方式,也能理解内容并完成操作。遵循现有配色、间距和字体规则,梳理组件职责、状态管理,以及数据获取与显示的分离,同时处理加载中、无数据和错误状态。

适用场景

适合创建新页面、修改已有界面、适配手机,或改善难以操作的表单。也适用于分析参考界面的信息优先级与交互模式,并将其转化为符合自身产品的界面。

使用示例

  • “按照现有设计体系,制作适配手机的列表页面。”
  • “从键盘操作和屏幕阅读器使用的角度改善这个表单。”
  • “添加加载中、无数据和错误时的显示。”

注意事项

以WCAG 2.1 AA为标准,在多种屏幕宽度及辅助工具下检查。即使使用参考界面,也不直接复制其他产品的品牌、专有文字、图片或完整布局。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确列出页面创建、已有界面修改和响应式布局等使用场景。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好提供组件文件结构、状态管理选择表及键盘无障碍代码示例。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好所给资料以界面实现示例为主,未要求对外发送、删除或读取凭据。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足使用React和TypeScript示例并列出状态管理库,但未提供安装配置步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月20日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md11.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Frontend UI Engineering

Overview

Build production-quality user interfaces that are accessible, performant, and visually polished. The goal is UI that looks like it was built by a design-aware engineer at a top company — not like it was generated by an AI. This means real design system adherence, proper accessibility, thoughtful interaction patterns, and no generic "AI aesthetic."

When to Use

  • Building new UI components or pages
  • Modifying existing user-facing interfaces
  • Implementing responsive layouts
  • Adding interactivity or state management
  • Fixing visual or UX issues

Component Architecture

File Structure

Colocate everything related to a component:

src/components/
  TaskList/
    TaskList.tsx          # Component implementation
    TaskList.test.tsx     # Tests
    TaskList.stories.tsx  # Storybook stories (if using)
    use-task-list.ts      # Custom hook (if complex state)
    types.ts              # Component-specific types (if needed)

Component Patterns

Prefer composition over configuration:

// Good: Composable
<Card>
  <CardHeader>
    <CardTitle>Tasks</CardTitle>
  </CardHeader>
  <CardBody>
    <TaskList tasks={tasks} />
  </CardBody>
</Card>

// Avoid: Over-configured
<Card
  title="Tasks"
  headerVariant="large"
  bodyPadding="md"
  content={<TaskList tasks={tasks} />}
/>

Keep components focused:

// Good: Does one thing
export function TaskItem({ task, onToggle, onDelete }: TaskItemProps) {
  return (
    <li className="flex items-center gap-3 p-3">
      <Checkbox checked={task.done} onChange={() => onToggle(task.id)} />
      <span className={task.done ? 'line-through text-muted' : ''}>{task.title}</span>
      <Button variant="ghost" size="sm" onClick={() => onDelete(task.id)}>
        <TrashIcon />
      </Button>
    </li>
  );
}

Separate data fetching from presentation:

// Container: handles data
export function TaskListContainer() {
  const { tasks, isLoading, error, refetch } = useTasks();

  if (isLoading) return <TaskListSkeleton />;
  if (error) return <ErrorState message="Failed to load tasks" retry={refetch} />;
  if (tasks.length === 0) return <EmptyState message="No tasks yet" />;

  return <TaskList tasks={tasks} />;
}

// Presentation: handles rendering
export function TaskList({ tasks }: { tasks: Task[] }) {
  return (
    <ul role="list" className="divide-y">
      {tasks.map(task => <TaskItem key={task.id} task={task} />)}
    </ul>
  );
}

State Management

Choose the simplest approach that works:

Local state (useState)           → Component-specific UI state
Lifted state                     → Shared between 2-3 sibling components
Context                          → Theme, auth, locale (read-heavy, write-rare)
URL state (searchParams)         → Filters, pagination, shareable UI state
Server state (React Query, SWR)  → Remote data with caching
Global store (Zustand, Redux)    → Complex client state shared app-wide

Avoid prop drilling deeper than 3 levels. If you're passing props through components that don't use them, introduce context or restructure the component tree.

Design System Adherence

Reference-led UI quality

When the product needs a distinct visual direction, collect evidence before choosing a layout:

  1. Search a trusted reference catalogue or use references supplied by the product team.
  2. Study two or three relevant screens. Record decisions about hierarchy, density, navigation, controls, responsive behavior, and interaction states.
  3. Turn those decisions into a short design contract before implementation. Name the screen's job, primary action, required states, responsive rules, and patterns to reject.
  4. Rebuild the useful structure in the product's own components, tokens, content, and visual language. Never copy another product's branding, proprietary text, imagery, or exact layout.

Use references as evidence, not as templates. If references are unavailable, document the assumptions and verify the result against the product's existing design system.

Avoid the AI Aesthetic

AI-generated UI has recognizable patterns. Avoid all of them:

AI DefaultWhy It Is a ProblemProduction Quality
Purple/indigo everythingModels default to visually "safe" palettes, making every app look identicalUse the project's actual color palette
Excessive gradientsGradients add visual noise and clash with most design systemsFlat or subtle gradients matching the design system
Rounded everything (rounded-2xl)Maximum rounding signals "friendly" but ignores the hierarchy of corner radii in real designsConsistent border-radius from the design system
Generic hero sectionsTemplate-driven layout with no connection to the actual content or user needContent-first layouts
Lorem ipsum-style copyPlaceholder text hides layout problems that real content reveals (length, wrapping, overflow)Realistic placeholder content
Oversized padding everywhereEqual generous padding destroys visual hierarchy and wastes screen spaceConsistent spacing scale
Stock card gridsUniform grids are a layout shortcut that ignores information priority and scanning patternsPurpose-driven layouts
Shadow-heavy designLayered shadows add depth that competes with content and slows rendering on low-end devicesSubtle or no shadows unless the design system specifies

Spacing and Layout

Use a consistent spacing scale. Don't invent values:

/* Use the scale: 0.25rem increments (or whatever the project uses) */
/* Good */  padding: 1rem;      /* 16px */
/* Good */  gap: 0.75rem;       /* 12px */
/* Bad */   padding: 13px;      /* Not on any scale */
/* Bad */   margin-top: 2.3rem; /* Not on any scale */

Typography

Respect the type hierarchy:

h1 → Page title (one per page)
h2 → Section title
h3 → Subsection title
body → Default text
small → Secondary/helper text

Don't skip heading levels. Don't use heading styles for non-heading content.

Color

  • Use semantic color tokens: text-primary, bg-surface, border-default — not raw hex values
  • Ensure sufficient contrast (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text)
  • Don't rely solely on color to convey information (use icons, text, or patterns too)

Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)

Every component must meet these standards:

Keyboard Navigation

// Every interactive element must be keyboard accessible
<button onClick={handleClick}>Click me</button>        // ✓ Focusable by default
<div onClick={handleClick}>Click me</div>               // ✗ Not focusable
<div role="button" tabIndex={0} onClick={handleClick}    // ✓ But prefer <button>
     onKeyDown={e => {
       if (e.key === 'Enter') handleClick();
       if (e.key === ' ') e.preventDefault();
     }}
     onKeyUp={e => {
       if (e.key === ' ') handleClick();
     }}>
  Click me
</div>

ARIA Labels

// Label interactive elements that lack visible text
<button aria-label="Close dialog"><XIcon /></button>

// Label form inputs
<label htmlFor="email">Email</label>
<input id="email" type="email" />

// Or use aria-label when no visible label exists
<input aria-label="Search tasks" type="search" />

Focus Management

// Move focus when content changes
function Dialog({ isOpen, onClose }: DialogProps) {
  const closeRef = useRef<HTMLButtonElement>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    if (isOpen) closeRef.current?.focus();
  }, [isOpen]);

  // Trap focus inside dialog when open
  return (
    <dialog open={isOpen}>
      <button ref={closeRef} onClick={onClose}>Close</button>
      {/* dialog content */}
    </dialog>
  );
}

Meaningful Empty and Error States

// Don't show blank screens
function TaskList({ tasks }: { tasks: Task[] }) {
  if (tasks.length === 0) {
    return (
      <div role="status" className="text-center py-12">
        <TasksEmptyIcon className="mx-auto h-12 w-12 text-muted" />
        <h3 className="mt-2 text-sm font-medium">No tasks</h3>
        <p className="mt-1 text-sm text-muted">Get started by creating a new task.</p>
        <Button className="mt-4" onClick={onCreateTask}>Create Task</Button>
      </div>
    );
  }

  return <ul role="list">...</ul>;
}

Responsive Design

Design for mobile first, then expand:

// Tailwind: mobile-first responsive
<div className="
  grid grid-cols-1      /* Mobile: single column */
  sm:grid-cols-2        /* Small: 2 columns */
  lg:grid-cols-3        /* Large: 3 columns */
  gap-4
">

Test at these breakpoints: 320px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px.

Loading and Transitions

// Skeleton loading (not spinners for content)
function TaskListSkeleton() {
  return (
    <div className="space-y-3" aria-busy="true" aria-label="Loading tasks">
      {Array.from({ length: 3 }).map((_, i) => (
        <div key={i} className="h-12 bg-muted animate-pulse rounded" />
      ))}
    </div>
  );
}

// Optimistic updates for perceived speed
function useToggleTask() {
  const queryClient = useQueryClient();

  return useMutation({
    mutationFn: toggleTask,
    onMutate: async (taskId) => {
      await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: ['tasks'] });
      const previous = queryClient.getQueryData(['tasks']);

      queryClient.setQueryData(['tasks'], (old: Task[]) =>
        old.map(t => t.id === taskId ? { ...t, done: !t.done } : t)
      );

      return { previous };
    },
    onError: (_err, _taskId, context) => {
      queryClient.setQueryData(['tasks'], context?.previous);
    },
  });
}

See Also

For detailed accessibility requirements and testing tools, see ../../references/accessibility-checklist.md.

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"Accessibility is a nice-to-have"It's a legal requirement in many jurisdictions and an engineering quality standard.
"We'll make it responsive later"Retrofitting responsive design is 3x harder than building it from the start.
"The design isn't final, so I'll skip styling"Use the design system defaults. Unstyled UI creates a broken first impression for reviewers.
"This is just a prototype"Prototypes become production code. Build the foundation right.
"The AI aesthetic is fine for now"It signals low quality. Use the project's actual design system from the start.

Red Flags

  • Components with more than 200 lines (split them)
  • Inline styles or arbitrary pixel values
  • Missing error states, loading states, or empty states
  • No keyboard navigation testing
  • Color as the sole indicator of state (red/green without text or icons)
  • Generic "AI look" (purple gradients, oversized cards, stock layouts)

Verification

After building UI:

  • Component renders without console errors
  • All interactive elements are keyboard accessible (Tab through the page)
  • Screen reader can convey the page's content and structure
  • Responsive: works at 320px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px
  • Loading, empty, error, success, and permission states handled when applicable
  • Follows the project's design system (spacing, colors, typography)
  • The rendered result passes a final UI-specific finish-gate review
  • No accessibility warnings in dev tools or axe-core

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

api-and-interface-design

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在实现前定义 API 和模块之间的输入输出,统一命名、错误格式与输入校验,并考虑现有调用方的兼容性及重试造成的重复处理。

  • 设计新的 REST API
  • 定义界面与服务器的数据规范
  • 在保持兼容的前提下扩展 API
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

browser-testing-with-devtools

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在真实浏览器中验证页面显示与操作,检查错误、网络通信和加载速度,并比较修复前后的截图、确认无障碍支持。

  • 排查布局与样式问题
  • 检查浏览器错误与API通信
  • 比较修复前后的页面
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

ci-cd-and-automation

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

自动执行代码变更后的测试、类型检查和构建,建立发布前的质量检查流程。涵盖GitHub Actions配置、分阶段发布和回滚步骤,也介绍失败排查与运行提速。

  • 为新项目引入CI
  • 自动执行测试和质量检查
  • 设计分阶段发布与回滚流程
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

code-review-and-quality

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

在合并前从正确性、可读性、架构、安全和性能五个维度审查代码变更,检查测试是否恰当,区分必须修复的问题与可选建议,并提出具体改进方法。

  • 合并前审查拉取请求
  • 检查人工智能编写的代码
  • 评估重构是否带来改善
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

code-simplification

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在保持行为不变的前提下,整理深层条件分支、长函数、重复逻辑和含糊命名。先检查现有规范与测试,再以可读性为标准逐步修改。

  • 改善已正常运行功能的代码可读性
  • 处理代码审查指出的复杂逻辑
  • 整理深层条件分支和长函数
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

constraint-driven-development

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

将项目质量标准及其数值、理由和检查方法写入文档,并从差异中检查跳过测试、抑制警告或降低门槛的改动,维持智能体开发质量。

  • 制定智能体开发的质量标准
  • 选择覆盖率与性能目标
  • 发现跳过测试或抑制警告
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

查看 addyosmani 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题