跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

planning-and-task-breakdown

将规格说明或需求拆分为带有完成标准和验证方法的小型实现任务,梳理依赖关系、执行顺序及检查节点,并保存为计划文档和任务清单。

原文查看原文说明

Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible.

AI 评分100分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 把大型功能拆分为实现任务
  • 按依赖关系安排执行顺序
  • 明确完成标准和验证方法
  • 找出可以并行推进的工作
  • 共享实现范围和风险

中文介绍

功能

将规格说明或明确的需求拆分为可实现、测试和检查的小任务。每项任务都包含目的、完成标准、验证方法、依赖关系、可能修改的文件和规模估计。按可逐一验证功能是否正常工作的单位划分任务,并安排执行顺序和中途检查节点。计划保存在tasks/plan.md,任务清单默认保存在tasks/todo.md。

适用场景

适合不知道如何着手大型功能,或需要共享实现范围和风险的时候。在交给多个智能体或跨会话推进之前,也可用来区分能够并行开展的工作与必须按顺序执行的工作。

使用示例

  • “请把这份规格说明拆分为带有完成标准和验证方法的任务。”
  • “请梳理依赖关系,确定执行顺序和检查节点。”
  • “请找出可以并行推进的任务。”

注意事项

成果是计划,规划期间不编写代码。如果现有未完成计划属于其他工作,会先询问,不直接覆盖。如已指定问题跟踪工具,则将任务记录到该工具中。实施前需要由人工审阅并批准计划。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明将清晰需求拆分为实现任务,并规定规划期间不编写代码。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好提供五步流程、任务模板、规模标准和保存位置。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好禁止覆盖其他工作的未完成计划,或批量删除其未完成跟踪事项。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
A良好默认使用Markdown文件,仅在指定时使用外部问题跟踪工具。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月20日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Planning and Task Breakdown

Overview

Decompose work into small, verifiable tasks with explicit acceptance criteria. Good task breakdown is the difference between an agent that completes work reliably and one that produces a tangled mess. Every task should be small enough to implement, test, and verify in a single focused session.

When to Use

  • You have a spec and need to break it into implementable units
  • A task feels too large or vague to start
  • Work needs to be parallelized across multiple agents or sessions
  • You need to communicate scope to a human
  • The implementation order isn't obvious

When NOT to use: Single-file changes with obvious scope, or when the spec already contains well-defined tasks.

The Planning Process

Step 1: Enter Plan Mode

Before writing any code, operate in read-only mode:

  • Read the spec and relevant codebase sections
  • Identify existing patterns and conventions
  • Map dependencies between components
  • Note risks and unknowns

Do NOT write code during planning. The output is a plan document saved to tasks/plan.md and a task list recorded in the task list target (see Output Files; default tasks/todo.md), not implementation.

Step 2: Identify the Dependency Graph

Map what depends on what:

Database schema
    │
    ├── API models/types
    │       │
    │       ├── API endpoints
    │       │       │
    │       │       └── Frontend API client
    │       │               │
    │       │               └── UI components
    │       │
    │       └── Validation logic
    │
    └── Seed data / migrations

Implementation order follows the dependency graph bottom-up: build foundations first.

Step 3: Slice Vertically

Instead of building all the database, then all the API, then all the UI — build one complete feature path at a time:

Bad (horizontal slicing):

Task 1: Build entire database schema
Task 2: Build all API endpoints
Task 3: Build all UI components
Task 4: Connect everything

Good (vertical slicing):

Task 1: User can create an account (schema + API + UI for registration)
Task 2: User can log in (auth schema + API + UI for login)
Task 3: User can create a task (task schema + API + UI for creation)
Task 4: User can view task list (query + API + UI for list view)

Each vertical slice delivers working, testable functionality.

Step 4: Write Tasks

Each task follows this structure, whether it lands in the markdown task list or as an item in an external tracker (see Output Files):

## Task [N]: [Short descriptive title]

**Description:** One paragraph explaining what this task accomplishes.

**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]

**Verification:**
- [ ] Tests pass: [the repository's focused-test command]
- [ ] Build succeeds: [the repository's build command]
- [ ] Manual check: [description of what to verify]

**Dependencies:** [Task numbers this depends on, or "None"]

**Files likely touched:**
- `src/path/to/file.ts`
- `tests/path/to/test.ts`

**Estimated scope:** [Small: 1-2 files | Medium: 3-5 files | Large: 5+ files]

Step 5: Order and Checkpoint

Arrange tasks so that:

  1. Dependencies are satisfied (build foundation first)
  2. Each task leaves the system in a working state
  3. Verification checkpoints occur after every 2-3 tasks
  4. High-risk tasks are early (fail fast)

Add explicit checkpoints to the task list target:

## Checkpoint: After Tasks 1-3
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Application builds without errors
- [ ] Core user flow works end-to-end
- [ ] Review with human before proceeding

Task Sizing Guidelines

SizeFilesScopeExample
XS1Single function or config changeAdd a validation rule
S1-2One component or endpointAdd a new API endpoint
M3-5One feature sliceUser registration flow
L5-8Multi-component featureSearch with filtering and pagination
XL8+Too large — break it down further—

If a task is L or larger, it should be broken into smaller tasks. An agent performs best on S and M tasks.

When to break a task down further:

  • It would take more than one focused session (roughly 2+ hours of agent work)
  • You cannot describe the acceptance criteria in 3 or fewer bullet points
  • It touches two or more independent subsystems (e.g., auth and billing)
  • You find yourself writing "and" in the task title (a sign it is two tasks)

Output Files

  • Plan document: Save the implementation plan to tasks/plan.md. This is always a markdown file — design decisions, risks, and open questions don't map cleanly onto individual tracker issues.
  • Task list: Record each task in the task list target (defined below).

Create the tasks/ directory if it does not exist.

Never overwrite an incomplete plan. Before writing tasks/plan.md or tasks/todo.md, check whether they already exist and still contain unchecked tasks:

  • Same work being replanned (the user asked to revise or extend this plan) → update the existing files in place.
  • Different work → stop and ask. The unchecked tasks may be mid-build in another session. Do not delete, overwrite, or rename the existing files on your own; present the conflict and let the user decide (finish the old plan first, explicitly discard it, or tell you where the new plan should go).

The same rule applies to an external task list target: never bulk-close or delete another plan's open tracker items to make room for new ones.

Task List Target

The task list target is where tasks and checkpoints are recorded. It is defined once, here; every other reference in this skill defers to it.

  • Default: a checklist-style markdown file at tasks/todo.md. This is the convention the /build command and other downstream tooling expect. Use it unless the project says otherwise.
  • External tracker: if the project's agent rules (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.) or the user designate an issue tracker (e.g. GitHub Issues, Jira, Linear, bd/beads), create one tracker item per task instead of writing tasks/todo.md. Map the Step 4 structure onto the tracker's fields: acceptance criteria and verification steps in the item body, dependencies via the tracker's linking mechanism (bd dep add, "blocked by", etc.). Record Step 5 checkpoints as tracker items too, or as a checklist in the plan document if the tracker has no natural equivalent.

When using an external tracker, note it in tasks/plan.md (e.g. "Tasks tracked in Linear project FOO") so downstream steps and future sessions know where to look, and keep the plan document's Task List section as an ordered index of tracker item IDs or links rather than a duplicate checklist.

Plan Document Template

# Implementation Plan: [Feature/Project Name]

## Overview
[One paragraph summary of what we're building]

## Architecture Decisions
- [Key decision 1 and rationale]
- [Key decision 2 and rationale]

## Task List

### Phase 1: Foundation
- [ ] Task 1: ...
- [ ] Task 2: ...

### Checkpoint: Foundation
- [ ] Tests pass, builds clean

### Phase 2: Core Features
- [ ] Task 3: ...
- [ ] Task 4: ...

### Checkpoint: Core Features
- [ ] End-to-end flow works

### Phase 3: Polish
- [ ] Task 5: ...
- [ ] Task 6: ...

### Checkpoint: Complete
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Ready for review

## Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [Strategy] |

## Open Questions
- [Question needing human input]

When tasks live in an external tracker, keep the Task List section above as an ordered index of tracker item IDs or links instead of a duplicate checklist.

Parallelization Opportunities

When multiple agents or sessions are available:

  • Safe to parallelize: Independent feature slices, tests for already-implemented features, documentation
  • Must be sequential: Database migrations, shared state changes, dependency chains
  • Needs coordination: Features that share an API contract (define the contract first, then parallelize)

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"I'll figure it out as I go"That's how you end up with a tangled mess and rework. 10 minutes of planning saves hours.
"The tasks are obvious"Write them down anyway. Explicit tasks surface hidden dependencies and forgotten edge cases.
"Planning is overhead"Planning is the task. Implementation without a plan is just typing.
"I can hold it all in my head"Context windows are finite. Written plans survive session boundaries and compaction.
"The old tasks/plan.md is stale, I'll just replace it"Unchecked tasks may be mid-build in another session. Overwriting them destroys work state that exists nowhere else. Stop and ask.

Red Flags

  • Starting implementation without a written task list
  • Overwriting a tasks/plan.md or tasks/todo.md that still has unchecked tasks for different work, without asking
  • Writing tasks/todo.md when the project has designated an external tracker (or scattering tasks across both)
  • Tasks that say "implement the feature" without acceptance criteria
  • No verification steps in the plan
  • All tasks are XL-sized
  • No checkpoints between tasks
  • Dependency order isn't considered

Verification

Before starting implementation, confirm:

  • Every task has acceptance criteria
  • Every task has a verification step
  • Task dependencies are identified and ordered correctly
  • Tasks are recorded in the task list target (default tasks/todo.md)
  • No pre-existing incomplete plan was overwritten without explicit user confirmation
  • No task touches more than ~5 files
  • Checkpoints exist between major phases
  • The human has reviewed and approved the plan

See Also

Acceptance criteria are per-task and answer "did we build the right thing?". They sit on top of the project-wide Definition of Done, the standing bar every task clears before it counts as done. See ../../references/definition-of-done.md.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

api-and-interface-design

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在实现前定义 API 和模块之间的输入输出,统一命名、错误格式与输入校验,并考虑现有调用方的兼容性及重试造成的重复处理。

  • 设计新的 REST API
  • 定义界面与服务器的数据规范
  • 在保持兼容的前提下扩展 API
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

browser-testing-with-devtools

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在真实浏览器中验证页面显示与操作,检查错误、网络通信和加载速度,并比较修复前后的截图、确认无障碍支持。

  • 排查布局与样式问题
  • 检查浏览器错误与API通信
  • 比较修复前后的页面
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

ci-cd-and-automation

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

自动执行代码变更后的测试、类型检查和构建,建立发布前的质量检查流程。涵盖GitHub Actions配置、分阶段发布和回滚步骤,也介绍失败排查与运行提速。

  • 为新项目引入CI
  • 自动执行测试和质量检查
  • 设计分阶段发布与回滚流程
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

code-review-and-quality

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

在合并前从正确性、可读性、架构、安全和性能五个维度审查代码变更,检查测试是否恰当,区分必须修复的问题与可选建议,并提出具体改进方法。

  • 合并前审查拉取请求
  • 检查人工智能编写的代码
  • 评估重构是否带来改善
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

code-simplification

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在保持行为不变的前提下,整理深层条件分支、长函数、重复逻辑和含糊命名。先检查现有规范与测试,再以可读性为标准逐步修改。

  • 改善已正常运行功能的代码可读性
  • 处理代码审查指出的复杂逻辑
  • 整理深层条件分支和长函数
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

constraint-driven-development

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

将项目质量标准及其数值、理由和检查方法写入文档,并从差异中检查跳过测试、抑制警告或降低门槛的改动,维持智能体开发质量。

  • 制定智能体开发的质量标准
  • 选择覆盖率与性能目标
  • 发现跳过测试或抑制警告
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

查看 addyosmani 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题