跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

agent-payment-x402

通过x402为AI智能体接入付费API和服务支付,设置任务与会话预算、收款方限制,以及由自己管理私钥的钱包。

原文查看原文说明

Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk, X Layer through OKX Payments / OKX Agent Payments Protocol, and Solana plus multi-network EVM through the upstream x402 packages with facilitator-based settlement. Use when an agent must pay for something itself and needs per-task budgets, spending controls, and a non-custodial wallet.

集成工具X (Twitter)
AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 让智能体使用付费API
  • 设置任务和会话支出上限
  • 限制收款方、网络与资产
  • 为API接入x402收费

中文介绍

功能

为AI智能体接入向付费API或外部服务付款的机制。通过x402在HTTP中处理付款请求与支付,设置单项任务预算、整个会话的支出上限、允许的收款方和交易频率。集成方案包括Base上的agentwallet-sdk、X Layer上的OKX Agent Payments Protocol,以及Solana和EVM网络上的官方x402软件包,也涵盖API接收付款的实现。

适用场景

适合需要让智能体调用付费API,或限制向其他智能体付款金额的开发者。自行管理私钥,同时希望预先规定支付权限范围时,也可使用。

使用示例

  • “为调用付费API的智能体设置任务预算和收款方限制。”
  • “设计一个在Solana和Base上接收付款的API方案。”

注意事项

所选方案需要相应的SDK、私钥和网络配置。支出规则由管理智能体运行的一方设置,不能由智能体自行设置。要求付款前批准,并固定软件包版本。生产使用前须确认最新支持情况,选择负责验证和结算付款的facilitator。默认的x402.org面向测试环境。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好选择表区分付费API访问与API收费,并列出各网络的集成方案。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好提供MCP配置示例、支出策略字段及各方案的集成步骤。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好要求付款前明确确认、固定软件包版本,并由运行管理方控制支出限制。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足需要SDK、私钥和网络,部分集成细节须查阅外部文档。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md26.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Agent Payment Execution (x402)

Enable AI agents to make policy-gated payments with built-in spending controls. Uses the x402 HTTP payment protocol and MCP tools so agents can pay for external services, APIs, or other agents without custodial risk.

When to Use

Use when: your agent needs to pay for an API call, purchase a service, settle with another agent, enforce per-task spending limits, or manage a non-custodial wallet. Pairs naturally with cost-aware-llm-pipeline and security-review skills.

Decision Tree

Choose the integration path based on whether your agent is buying access to a paid API or charging others for one:

NeedRecommended path
Agent pays a 402-gated API on Base or another agentwallet-supported chainUse agentwallet-sdk as an MCP payment server with strict spending policy
Agent pays a 402-gated API on X LayerUse OKX Agent Payments Protocol from okx/onchainos-skills; okx-x402-payment is a deprecated legacy alias
Agent pays a 402-gated API on Solana or another x402 v2 networkWrap the agent's HTTP client with the upstream @x402/fetch or @x402/axios package and register the EVM/SVM schemes; the resource server's facilitator verifies and settles
API charges agents on Solana or multiple networks (TypeScript, Python, or Go)Use the upstream x402 middleware from x402-foundation/x402 — @x402/express, @x402/hono, @x402/next, or @x402/fastify for TypeScript, x402 for Python, github.com/x402-foundation/x402/go/v2 for Go
TypeScript API charges agentsUse OKX Payments TypeScript seller SDK docs for Express, Hono, Fastify, or Next.js
Go API charges agentsUse OKX Payments Go seller SDK docs for Gin, Echo, or net/http
Rust API charges agentsUse OKX Payments Rust seller SDK docs for Axum
Java API charges agentsUse OKX Payments Java seller SDK docs for Spring Boot 2/3, Java EE, or Jakarta
Python API charges agentsCheck the current OKX Payments repository before implementation; a Python seller guide may not be available

Supported Networks

  • agentwallet-sdk: use the package docs to confirm current network coverage before production. Base Sepolia is the safest development default; Base mainnet is the production path called out by the original skill.
  • OKX Payments / X Layer: current seller docs target X Layer (eip155:196) and USDT0 settlement. Fetch current SDK docs before generating production code because payment packages and facilitator behavior can change quickly.
  • Upstream x402 packages: multi-network by design — one route can advertise Base and Solana simultaneously and let the buyer pick. The packages default to the x402.org facilitator, which is testnet-only (Base Sepolia eip155:84532, Solana devnet solana:EtWTRABZaYq6iMfeYKouRu166VU2xqa1, plus Stellar, Aptos, Hedera, and XRPL testnets) and is not intended for mainnet routes. For mainnet (solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp for Solana), either self-facilitate, run your own facilitator, or pick a hosted one from the upstream facilitator list — see the facilitator comparison under Option C. Confirm live coverage at the facilitator's /supported endpoint before production rather than hardcoding it here.

How It Works

x402 Protocol

x402 extends HTTP 402 (Payment Required) into a machine-negotiable flow. When a server returns 402, the agent's payment tool negotiates price, checks budget, signs a transaction, and retries only inside the policy and confirmation boundary set by the orchestrator.

Spending Controls

Every payment tool call enforces a SpendingPolicy:

  • Per-task budget — max spend for a single agent action
  • Per-session budget — cumulative limit across an entire session
  • Allowlisted recipients — restrict which addresses/services the agent can pay
  • Rate limits — max transactions per minute/hour

Non-Custodial Wallets

Agents hold their own keys via ERC-4337 smart accounts. The orchestrator sets policy before delegation; the agent can only spend within bounds. No pooled funds, no custodial risk.

MCP Integration

The payment layer exposes standard MCP tools that slot into any Claude Code or agent harness setup.

Security note: Always pin the package version. This tool manages private keys — unpinned npx installs introduce supply-chain risk.

Option A: agentwallet-sdk (Base / multi-chain)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentpay": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0"]
    }
  }
}

Available Tools (agent-callable)

ToolPurpose
get_balanceCheck agent wallet balance
send_paymentSend payment to address or ENS
check_spendingQuery remaining budget
list_transactionsAudit trail of all payments

Note: Spending policy is set by the orchestrator before delegating to the agent — not by the agent itself. This prevents agents from escalating their own spending limits. Configure policy via set_policy in your orchestration layer or pre-task hook, never as an agent-callable tool.

Option B: OKX Agent Payments Protocol (X Layer)

Use this path for X Layer x402, Multi-Party Payment (MPP), session payment, charge, and A2A charge flows.

For buyer-side agent flows:

  1. Install or reference the current okx/onchainos-skills repository.
  2. Use skills/okx-agent-payments-protocol/SKILL.md as the dispatcher.
  3. Treat skills/okx-x402-payment/SKILL.md as a deprecated compatibility alias, not as the canonical skill.
  4. Require explicit user confirmation before wallet status checks or payment actions. Do not hide payment execution behind a generic tool call.

For seller-side API flows, fetch the latest language-specific guide before generating code:

RuntimeCurrent guide
TypeScripthttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/typescript/SELLER.md
Gohttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/go/x402/SELLER.md
Rusthttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/rust/x402/SELLER.md
Javahttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/java/SELLER.md

Do not copy examples from older docs without checking the current OKX repository. Current OKX guidance uses okx-agent-payments-protocol as the dispatcher, and Java seller docs are now available.

Option C: Upstream x402 packages (Solana + Base/EVM)

Use this path when the agent pays — or your API charges — on Solana, Base, or another network the upstream protocol implementation supports. The canonical x402 monorepo at x402-foundation/x402 is actively maintained and publishes the client and middleware packages directly. Unlike Options A and B this is not a separate MCP server — you wrap the agent's own HTTP client, and a facilitator chosen by the resource server verifies and settles.

For buyer-side agent flows:

  1. Start from the maintained examples in examples/typescript/clients (fetch, axios, MCP) rather than copying snippets from older docs.

  2. Require explicit user confirmation before signing or submitting the first paid request, exactly as Option B requires for OKX flows. Do not hide payment execution behind a generic tool call.

  3. Pin package versions (for example @x402/fetch@2.22.0); all upstream packages version in lockstep.

  4. Enforce your budget with a PaymentPolicy registered on the client, so the check runs against the server's actual challenge on every call. A budget compared against a number you passed in yourself proves nothing — the amount, asset, and network all come from the server, so all three must be validated before a signature exists.

  5. Configure an exact resource-origin allowlist separately from recipient and budget policy. All payment-enabled fetches below refuse redirects. Session approval names the approved origins, networks, assets, recipients, and human-unit spending caps; concurrent calls share one decision. Keep this client and its policy private to the orchestrator.

import { x402Client, wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { ExactSvmScheme } from "@x402/svm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
import { createKeyPairSignerFromBytes } from "@solana/kit";
import { base58 } from "@scure/base";

// Signer keys belong to the ORCHESTRATOR's env — never hardcoded, never agent-writable.
const evmKey = process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY as `0x${string}`;
const svmKey = process.env.SVM_PRIVATE_KEY;
if (!evmKey || !svmKey) {
  throw new Error("Signer keys are not set — refusing to start payment client");
}

// One client, both network families: the buyer pays whichever chain the 402 offers.
const client = new x402Client();
client.register("eip155:*", new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(evmKey)));
client.register("solana:*", new ExactSvmScheme(await createKeyPairSignerFromBytes(base58.decode(svmKey))));

// A PaymentPolicy filters the SERVER's payment requirements before any
// signature is created. Returning an empty array means "nothing here is
// acceptable" and the client refuses to pay rather than falling back.
const ALLOWED_NETWORKS = new Set([
  "solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp",      // Solana mainnet
  "eip155:8453",                                   // Base
]);
const MAX_AMOUNT = 10_000n;      // atomic units, 6-decimal USDC: 0.01 USDC per call
const SESSION_CAP = 50_000n;     // 0.05 USDC across the whole session

// EVM addresses are case-insensitive, so compare them lowercased. Solana
// addresses are base58 and ARE case-sensitive — never lowercase those, or a
// different account could slip through.
const normalizeAddress = (a: string) => (a.startsWith("0x") ? a.toLowerCase() : a);
const ALLOWED_ASSETS = new Set(
  [
    "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",  // USDC, Solana mainnet
    "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",    // USDC, Base
  ].map(normalizeAddress),
);
// Who you are willing to pay. Without this, any 402 an agent happens to hit
// can name its own recipient.
const ALLOWED_PAY_TO = new Set(
  ["7pr7NCaQRz5PEhPy7BAeB3Z72TVkiShhjRyVCN5DA6yC"].map(normalizeAddress),
);

client.registerPolicy((_x402Version, requirements) =>
  requirements.filter(r => {
    if (!ALLOWED_NETWORKS.has(r.network)) return false;                   // wrong chain
    if (!ALLOWED_ASSETS.has(normalizeAddress(r.asset))) return false;     // wrong token
    if (!ALLOWED_PAY_TO.has(normalizeAddress(r.payTo))) return false;     // wrong recipient
    try {
      const amount = BigInt(r.amount);
      return amount >= 0n && amount <= MAX_AMOUNT;                        // over budget / negative
    } catch {
      return false;                                                       // unparseable amount
    }
  }),
);

// The policy sees one challenge at a time, so it cannot enforce a session
// total or ask a human anything. Keep the payment-enabled client private and
// route every paid call through the payOnce boundary below.

// Supply this from your harness — a real prompt, never a stub that returns true.
declare function confirmWithUser(prompt: string): Promise<boolean>;

// Resource authorization is independent of recipient and budget policy.
// The ORCHESTRATOR supplies exact approved HTTPS origins before delegation;
// never populate this set from a server challenge or agent-controlled input.
const ALLOWED_ORIGINS = new Set(["https://api.example.com"]);
function requireAllowedOrigin(url: string): void {
  const parsed = new URL(url);
  if (!ALLOWED_ORIGINS.has(parsed.origin) || parsed.username || parsed.password) {
    throw new Error("Resource origin is not authorized");
  }
}

// Both approved assets above are 6-decimal USDC. Update this trusted formatting
// policy along with the asset allowlist if you support other assets/decimals.
const USDC_SCALE = 1_000_000n;
const humanUSDC = (amount: bigint) =>
  `${amount / USDC_SCALE}.${(amount % USDC_SCALE).toString().padStart(6, "0").replace(/0+$/, "") || "0"} USDC`;

let sessionSpent = 0n;
let sessionApproval: Promise<boolean> | undefined;

async function payOnce(url: string, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response> {
  requireAllowedOrigin(url); // Before reservation, prompt, fetch, or signature.
  // Reserve the worst case the policy allows. Settlement responses do not
  // carry an amount, so counting MAX_AMOUNT per call is a deliberate
  // over-estimate — it can stop early, never late. Reserve before any await,
  // so concurrent calls cannot all pass the check.
  if (sessionSpent + MAX_AMOUNT > SESSION_CAP) {
    throw new Error("Session budget exhausted — blocked");
  }
  sessionSpent += MAX_AMOUNT;
  // Release the reservation only when no signed payment left this process:
  // a declined or failed prompt, a challenge the policy rejected, or a free
  // response. Once a signed request is sent it may settle, so keep it counted.
  let signedRequestSent = false;
  const trackingFetch: typeof fetch = async (input, reqInit) => {
    // Override caller options on BOTH the challenge and signed retry. Native
    // fetch refuses redirects, so an unauthorized host cannot return a 402
    // or receive a payment header via an automatic redirect.
    const req = new Request(input, { ...reqInit, redirect: "error" });
    requireAllowedOrigin(req.url);
    if (req.headers.has("PAYMENT-SIGNATURE") || req.headers.has("X-PAYMENT")) {
      signedRequestSent = true;
    }
    const response = await fetch(req);
    // Also fail closed for adapters that expose a redirect response instead.
    if (response.redirected || (response.status >= 300 && response.status < 400)) {
      throw new Error("Paid request redirects are blocked");
    }
    return response;
  };
  try {
    // Install one promise before awaiting the prompt. Concurrent calls share
    // the same decision, including a decline or failure; never auto-reprompt.
    sessionApproval ??= Promise.resolve().then(() => confirmWithUser(
      `Allow paid requests to origins: ${[...ALLOWED_ORIGINS].join(", ")}? ` +
      `Networks: ${[...ALLOWED_NETWORKS].join(", ")}. ` +
      `Assets: ${[...ALLOWED_ASSETS].join(", ")} (6-decimal USDC). ` +
      `Recipients (payTo): ${[...ALLOWED_PAY_TO].join(", ")}. ` +
      `Per-call cap: ${humanUSDC(MAX_AMOUNT)}; session cap: ${humanUSDC(SESSION_CAP)}.`,
    ));
    if (!await sessionApproval) {
      throw new Error("User declined: no payment attempted");
    }
    return await wrapFetchWithPayment(trackingFetch, client)(url, init);
  } finally {
    if (!signedRequestSent) sessionSpent -= MAX_AMOUNT;
  }
}

const res = await payOnce("https://api.example.com/data", { method: "GET" });

With the policy registered, an over-budget amount, an unexpected token, or an unregistered chain all fail closed — createPaymentPayload throws instead of signing, because every candidate was filtered out. Devnet USDC is 4zMMC9srt5Ri5X14GAgXhaHii3GnPAEERYPJgZJDncDU; add it to ALLOWED_ASSETS only for development. Test the policy adversarially — feed it a challenge demanding 5000000 atomic units, one quoting a different mint, and one on a chain you never registered, and assert that none of them produce a signature. In the exact-SVM scheme the facilitator is the transaction fee payer, so the buyer wallet holds USDC only — no SOL for gas.

Facilitator choice. A facilitator verifies and settles on the resource server's behalf, so this is the resource server's decision, not the buyer's. In rough order of least to most trust delegated:

OptionWhen it fits
Self-facilitate in-processYou want no third party in the settlement path and can hold keys and RPC access yourself
Run your own facilitatorYou want that same control but shared across several services
x402.org facilitatorDevelopment and testnets — it is the package default, requires no setup, and upstream documents it as not intended for mainnet routes
A hosted production facilitatorYou want mainnet coverage without operating infrastructure

For the hosted option, choose from the facilitator list in the upstream docs rather than a name copied from here — it is maintained, it is not exhaustive, and coverage changes. As of writing it includes Coinbase's CDP (KYT/OFAC screening on every transaction), PayAI, Corbits, Dexter, Solvador, and others; several cover Solana mainnet alongside EVM. Whichever you pick, confirm live coverage at its /supported endpoint before production and re-check when you add a network.

Disclosure: this section was contributed by someone who works on PayAI, one of the listed facilitators. It is included as one option among several, and the self-hosted and upstream-default paths above are deliberately listed first.

Seller side (API charges agents). Use the upstream middleware; one route can advertise Base and Solana simultaneously (see examples/typescript/servers for runnable versions):

RuntimePackage
Express / Hono / Next.js / Fastify@x402/express@2.22.0, @x402/hono@2.22.0, @x402/next@2.22.0, @x402/fastify@2.22.0
Python (FastAPI, Flask)x402 on PyPI
Go (Gin, Echo, net/http)github.com/x402-foundation/x402/go/v2

Solana sellers: the payTo address needs its canonical token account first. The exact-SVM client derives the associated token account (ATA) for payTo with findAssociatedTokenPda and transfers there; it never creates it. If that exact account is missing, settlement fails at simulation and the 402 comes back with transaction_simulation_failed, which reads like a client bug rather than a missing recipient account. Check the derived address itself — scanning the owner's token accounts is not equivalent, because a non-canonical auxiliary account for the same mint would pass while the ATA the client targets is still absent:

import { findAssociatedTokenPda, TOKEN_PROGRAM_ADDRESS } from "@solana-program/token";

const [ata] = await findAssociatedTokenPda({
  mint: "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",   // USDC mainnet
  owner: payToAddress,
  tokenProgram: TOKEN_PROGRAM_ADDRESS,                     // TOKEN_2022_PROGRAM_ADDRESS for Token-2022 mints
});

Then confirm that exact address exists — value: null means it does not, and settlement to it will fail:

curl -s https://api.mainnet-beta.solana.com -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"getAccountInfo",
       "params":["<DERIVED_ATA>",{"encoding":"base64"}]}' \
  | jq '.result.value != null'

To provision it (whoever creates it pays the small rent, not the payer):

  • In code, add getCreateAssociatedTokenIdempotentInstruction from @solana-program/token to your onboarding flow — the idempotent variant is safe to re-run and is the only option that is deterministic.
  • spl-token create-account <MINT> --owner <PAYTO_ADDRESS> with the spl-token CLI.
  • A transfer of that token to payTo also works, but only when the sender includes the create instruction — wallets and spl-token transfer --fund-recipient do; a bare transferChecked to a missing ATA fails the same way settlement does.

This bites hardest when payouts go to freshly provisioned or custodial wallets, which often have no ATA for the asset yet.

Discovery. Facilitators that implement the x402 bazaar extension expose a /discovery/resources endpoint — query the CDP catalog at https://api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402/discovery/resources and the PayAI catalog at https://facilitator.payai.network/discovery/resources. For Solana-payable services there is also pay.sh, the Solana Foundation's curated catalog.

Examples

Budget enforcement in an MCP client

When building an orchestrator that calls the agentpay MCP server, enforce budgets before dispatching paid tool calls.

Prerequisites: Install the package before adding the MCP config — npx without -y will prompt for confirmation in non-interactive environments, causing the server to hang: npm install -g agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0

import { Client } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/client/index.js";
import { StdioClientTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/client/stdio.js";

async function main() {
  // 1. Validate credentials before constructing the transport.
  //    A missing key must fail immediately — never let the subprocess start without auth.
  const walletKey = process.env.WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY;
  if (!walletKey) {
    throw new Error("WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY is not set — refusing to start payment server");
  }

  // Connect to the agentpay MCP server via stdio transport.
  // Whitelist only the env vars the server needs — never forward all of process.env
  // to a third-party subprocess that manages private keys.
  const transport = new StdioClientTransport({
    command: "npx",
    args: ["agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0"],
    env: {
      PATH: process.env.PATH ?? "",
      NODE_ENV: process.env.NODE_ENV ?? "production",
      WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY: walletKey,
    },
  });
  const agentpay = new Client({ name: "orchestrator", version: "1.0.0" });
  await agentpay.connect(transport);

  // 2. Set spending policy before delegating to the agent.
  //    Always verify success — a silent failure means no controls are active.
  const policyResult = await agentpay.callTool({
    name: "set_policy",
    arguments: {
      per_task_budget: 0.50,
      per_session_budget: 5.00,
      allowlisted_recipients: ["api.example.com"],
    },
  });
  if (policyResult.isError) {
    throw new Error(
      `Failed to set spending policy — do not delegate: ${JSON.stringify(policyResult.content)}`
    );
  }

  // 3. Use preToolCheck before any paid action
  await preToolCheck(agentpay, 0.01);
}

// Pre-tool hook: fail-closed budget enforcement with four distinct error paths.
async function preToolCheck(agentpay: Client, apiCost: number): Promise<void> {
  // Path 1: Reject invalid input (NaN/Infinity bypass the < comparison)
  if (!Number.isFinite(apiCost) || apiCost < 0) {
    throw new Error(`Invalid apiCost: ${apiCost} — action blocked`);
  }

  // Path 2: Transport/connectivity failure
  let result;
  try {
    result = await agentpay.callTool({ name: "check_spending" });
  } catch (err) {
    throw new Error(`Payment service unreachable — action blocked: ${err}`);
  }

  // Path 3: Tool returned an error (e.g., auth failure, wallet not initialised)
  if (result.isError) {
    throw new Error(
      `check_spending failed — action blocked: ${JSON.stringify(result.content)}`
    );
  }

  // Path 4: Parse and validate the response shape
  let remaining: number;
  try {
    const parsed = JSON.parse(
      (result.content as Array<{ text: string }>)[0].text
    );
    if (!Number.isFinite(parsed?.remaining)) {
      throw new TypeError("missing or non-finite 'remaining' field");
    }
    remaining = parsed.remaining;
  } catch (err) {
    throw new Error(
      `check_spending returned unexpected format — action blocked: ${err}`
    );
  }

  // Path 5: Budget exceeded
  if (remaining < apiCost) {
    throw new Error(
      `Budget exceeded: need $${apiCost} but only $${remaining} remaining`
    );
  }
}

main().catch((err) => {
  console.error(err);
  process.exitCode = 1;
});

Best Practices

  • Set budgets before delegation: When spawning sub-agents, attach a SpendingPolicy via your orchestration layer. Never give an agent unlimited spend.
  • Pin your dependencies: Always specify an exact version in your MCP config (e.g., agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0). Verify package integrity before deploying to production.
  • Audit trails: Use list_transactions in post-task hooks to log what was spent and why.
  • Fail closed: If the payment tool is unreachable, block the paid action — don't fall back to unmetered access.
  • Pair with security-review: Payment tools are high-privilege. Apply the same scrutiny as shell access.
  • Test with testnets first: Use Base Sepolia for development; switch to Base mainnet for production. On Solana, develop against Solana devnet (solana:EtWTRABZaYq6iMfeYKouRu166VU2xqa1) and the free x402.org facilitator before moving to a production facilitator on mainnet.
  • On Solana, fund USDC not SOL: The exact-SVM scheme makes the facilitator the transaction fee payer, so a SOL-less wallet still pays. Verify each challenge's asset against the expected USDC mint (mainnet EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v, devnet 4zMMC9srt5Ri5X14GAgXhaHii3GnPAEERYPJgZJDncDU) before signing — a wrapped client that pays any asset is a hole in your budget.

Production Reference

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

accessibility

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。

  • 为纯图标按钮添加说明
  • 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
  • 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。

  • 排查仅在应用内出现的故障
  • 调查旧对话混入回答的原因
  • 核对工具漏执行或虚报执行
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-harness-construction

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。

  • 设计智能体工具及输入格式
  • 明确工具结果与下一步行动
  • 制定安全重试与停止条件
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。

  • 诊断代理连续失败
  • 调查重复调用工具的循环
  • 检查上下文积累导致的输出退化
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题