跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

code-tour

生成CodeTour格式的分步代码导览,引用经核实的文件和行号,帮助新维护者学习代码、理解设计、审查PR,并沿执行路径调查故障或检查安全边界。

原文查看原文说明

Create CodeTour `.tour` files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests. Use when the user asks for a code tour, onboarding walkthrough, PR tour, or an explanation of how a subsystem works.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 为新维护者编写代码导览
  • 理解架构或功能执行路径
  • 按顺序审查PR变更
  • 检查故障路径和安全边界

中文介绍

功能

code-tour生成CodeTour格式的.tour文件,说明代码的阅读顺序和各处含义。它先了解仓库结构与执行入口,再核实实际存在的文件、行号和代码范围,并附上解释。每一步简要说明正在查看什么、如何运行、对读者有何意义,以及容易忽略的细节。

适用场景

适合为新维护者提供代码导览,或将某项功能的执行路径保存为可重复使用的导览。也可用于讲解架构、依次审查PR变更,以及检查故障路径或安全边界。解释深度和步骤数量会根据读者角色调整。

使用示例

  • “为新维护者创建导览,从这个服务的入口讲到主要处理流程。”
  • “创建一个能按顺序查看本次PR变更的导览。”
  • “沿着代码解释发生故障的执行路径。”

注意事项

产物是.tours/目录中的JSON格式.tour文件,不修改源代码,使用时以CodeTour格式为前提。ref指定的分支或提交必须包含所引用的文件。介绍PR新增文件时,应指定该PR的分支。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确列出新人引导、PR审查和故障调查等用途,并指定输出.tour文件。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好包含从调查到验证的步骤、JSON示例、保存目录及行号和ref的检查方法。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好仅创建.tours/中的.tour文件,并明确禁止修改源代码。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足明确要求使用CodeTour格式,但未说明如何安装配置查看环境。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Code Tour

Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.

A good tour is a narrative for a specific reader:

  • what they are looking at
  • why it matters
  • what path they should follow next

Only create .tour JSON files. Do not modify source code as part of this skill.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour
  • the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact
  • the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer
  • the task is better served by a guided sequence than a flat summary

Examples:

  • onboarding a new maintainer
  • architecture tour for one service or package
  • PR-review walk-through anchored to changed files
  • RCA tour showing the failure path
  • security review tour of trust boundaries and key checks

When NOT to Use

Instead of code-tourUse
A one-off explanation in chat is enoughanswer directly
The user wants prose docs, not a .tour artifactdocumentation-lookup or repo docs editing
The task is implementation or refactoringdo the implementation work
The task is broad codebase onboarding without a tour artifactcodebase-onboarding

Workflow

1. Discover

Explore the repo before writing anything:

  • README and package/app entry points
  • folder structure
  • relevant config files
  • the changed files if the tour is PR-focused

Do not start writing steps before you understand the shape of the code.

2. Infer the reader

Decide the persona and depth from the request.

Request shapePersonaSuggested depth
"onboarding", "new joiner"new-joiner9-13 steps
"quick tour", "vibe check"vibecoder5-8 steps
"architecture"architect14-18 steps
"tour this PR"pr-reviewer7-11 steps
"why did this break"rca-investigator7-11 steps
"security review"security-reviewer7-11 steps
"explain how this feature works"feature-explainer7-11 steps
"debug this path"bug-fixer7-11 steps

3. Read and verify anchors

Every file path and line anchor must be real:

  • confirm the file exists
  • confirm the line numbers are in range
  • if using a selection, verify the exact block
  • if the file is volatile, prefer a pattern-based anchor

Never guess line numbers.

4. Write the .tour

Write to:

.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour

Keep the path deterministic and readable.

5. Validate

Before finishing:

  • every referenced path exists
  • every line or selection is valid
  • the first step is anchored to a real file or directory
  • the ref points at a branch or commit that actually has every file the tour references (see below)
  • the tour tells a coherent story rather than listing files

The ref Field

ref ties the tour to a git branch or commit. It matters more than it looks: when ref is not the branch the reader has checked out, CodeTour opens each step's file from that revision in git, not from the files on disk. If a file is not in that revision, the step will not open — the reader sees "The editor could not be opened because the file was not found" even though the file is sitting right there. The tour and its comments still show, so the real cause is easy to miss.

Pick ref by tour type:

Tour typeSet ref to
PR tourthe PR branch — never the base branch
Onboarding / architecturethe branch the reader will be on (often main), or leave it out
Not sureleave ref out, so CodeTour reads files straight from disk

The PR case is the common trap: a PR usually adds new files, and new files do not exist on the base branch yet. Point ref at the base (e.g. develop) and every step on a new file fails to open.

Before finishing, confirm each step's file actually exists at the ref you chose.

Step Types

Content

Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:

{ "title": "Next Steps", "description": "You can now trace the request path end to end." }

Do not make the first step content-only.

Directory

Use to orient the reader to a module:

{ "directory": "src/services", "title": "Service Layer", "description": "The core orchestration logic lives here." }

File + line

This is the default step type:

{ "file": "src/auth/middleware.ts", "line": 42, "title": "Auth Gate", "description": "Every protected request passes here first." }

Selection

Use when one code block matters more than the whole file:

{
  "file": "src/core/pipeline.ts",
  "selection": {
    "start": { "line": 15, "character": 0 },
    "end": { "line": 34, "character": 0 }
  },
  "title": "Request Pipeline",
  "description": "This block wires validation, auth, and downstream execution."
}

Pattern

Use when exact lines may drift:

{ "file": "src/app.ts", "pattern": "export default class App", "title": "Application Entry" }

URI

Use for PRs, issues, or docs when helpful:

{ "uri": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/456", "title": "The PR" }

Writing Rule: SMIG

Each description should answer:

  • Situation: what the reader is looking at
  • Mechanism: how it works
  • Implication: why it matters for this persona
  • Gotcha: what a smart reader might miss

Keep descriptions compact, specific, and grounded in the actual code.

Narrative Shape

Use this arc unless the task clearly needs something different:

  1. orientation
  2. module map
  3. core execution path
  4. edge case or gotcha
  5. closing / next move

The tour should feel like a path, not an inventory.

Example

{
  "$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
  "title": "API Service Tour",
  "description": "Walkthrough of the request path for the payments service.",
  "ref": "main",
  "steps": [
    {
      "directory": "src",
      "title": "Source Root",
      "description": "All runtime code for the service starts here."
    },
    {
      "file": "src/server.ts",
      "line": 12,
      "title": "Entry Point",
      "description": "The server boots here and wires middleware before any route is reached."
    },
    {
      "file": "src/routes/payments.ts",
      "line": 8,
      "title": "Payment Routes",
      "description": "Every payments request enters through this router before hitting service logic."
    },
    {
      "title": "Next Steps",
      "description": "You can now follow any payment request end to end with the main anchors in place."
    }
  ]
}

Anti-Patterns

Anti-patternFix
Flat file listingTell a story with dependency between steps
Generic descriptionsName the concrete code path or pattern
Guessed anchorsVerify every file and line first
Too many steps for a quick tourCut aggressively
First step is content-onlyAnchor the first step to a real file or directory
Persona mismatchWrite for the actual reader, not a generic engineer

Best Practices

  • keep step count proportional to repo size and persona depth
  • use directory steps for orientation, file steps for substance
  • for PR tours, cover changed files first
  • for monorepos, scope to the relevant packages instead of touring everything
  • close with what the reader can now do, not a recap

Related Skills

  • codebase-onboarding
  • coding-standards
  • council
  • official upstream format: microsoft/codetour

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

accessibility

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。

  • 为纯图标按钮添加说明
  • 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
  • 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。

  • 排查仅在应用内出现的故障
  • 调查旧对话混入回答的原因
  • 核对工具漏执行或虚报执行
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-harness-construction

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。

  • 设计智能体工具及输入格式
  • 明确工具结果与下一步行动
  • 制定安全重试与停止条件
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。

  • 诊断代理连续失败
  • 调查重复调用工具的循环
  • 检查上下文积累导致的输出退化
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题