依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。
- 为纯图标按钮添加说明
- 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
- 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
生成CodeTour格式的分步代码导览,引用经核实的文件和行号,帮助新维护者学习代码、理解设计、审查PR,并沿执行路径调查故障或检查安全边界。
Create CodeTour `.tour` files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests. Use when the user asks for a code tour, onboarding walkthrough, PR tour, or an explanation of how a subsystem works.
code-tour生成CodeTour格式的.tour文件,说明代码的阅读顺序和各处含义。它先了解仓库结构与执行入口,再核实实际存在的文件、行号和代码范围,并附上解释。每一步简要说明正在查看什么、如何运行、对读者有何意义,以及容易忽略的细节。
适合为新维护者提供代码导览,或将某项功能的执行路径保存为可重复使用的导览。也可用于讲解架构、依次审查PR变更,以及检查故障路径或安全边界。解释深度和步骤数量会根据读者角色调整。
产物是.tours/目录中的JSON格式.tour文件,不修改源代码,使用时以CodeTour格式为前提。ref指定的分支或提交必须包含所引用的文件。介绍PR新增文件时,应指定该PR的分支。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。
总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.
A good tour is a narrative for a specific reader:
Only create .tour JSON files. Do not modify source code as part of this skill.
Use this skill when:
Examples:
| Instead of code-tour | Use |
|---|---|
| A one-off explanation in chat is enough | answer directly |
The user wants prose docs, not a .tour artifact | documentation-lookup or repo docs editing |
| The task is implementation or refactoring | do the implementation work |
| The task is broad codebase onboarding without a tour artifact | codebase-onboarding |
Explore the repo before writing anything:
Do not start writing steps before you understand the shape of the code.
Decide the persona and depth from the request.
| Request shape | Persona | Suggested depth |
|---|---|---|
| "onboarding", "new joiner" | new-joiner | 9-13 steps |
| "quick tour", "vibe check" | vibecoder | 5-8 steps |
| "architecture" | architect | 14-18 steps |
| "tour this PR" | pr-reviewer | 7-11 steps |
| "why did this break" | rca-investigator | 7-11 steps |
| "security review" | security-reviewer | 7-11 steps |
| "explain how this feature works" | feature-explainer | 7-11 steps |
| "debug this path" | bug-fixer | 7-11 steps |
Every file path and line anchor must be real:
Never guess line numbers.
.tourWrite to:
.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour
Keep the path deterministic and readable.
Before finishing:
ref points at a branch or commit that actually has every file the tour references (see below)ref Fieldref ties the tour to a git branch or commit. It matters more than it looks: when ref is not the branch the reader has checked out, CodeTour opens each step's file from that revision in git, not from the files on disk. If a file is not in that revision, the step will not open — the reader sees "The editor could not be opened because the file was not found" even though the file is sitting right there. The tour and its comments still show, so the real cause is easy to miss.
Pick ref by tour type:
| Tour type | Set ref to |
|---|---|
| PR tour | the PR branch — never the base branch |
| Onboarding / architecture | the branch the reader will be on (often main), or leave it out |
| Not sure | leave ref out, so CodeTour reads files straight from disk |
The PR case is the common trap: a PR usually adds new files, and new files do not exist on the base branch yet. Point ref at the base (e.g. develop) and every step on a new file fails to open.
Before finishing, confirm each step's file actually exists at the ref you chose.
Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:
{ "title": "Next Steps", "description": "You can now trace the request path end to end." }
Do not make the first step content-only.
Use to orient the reader to a module:
{ "directory": "src/services", "title": "Service Layer", "description": "The core orchestration logic lives here." }
This is the default step type:
{ "file": "src/auth/middleware.ts", "line": 42, "title": "Auth Gate", "description": "Every protected request passes here first." }
Use when one code block matters more than the whole file:
{
"file": "src/core/pipeline.ts",
"selection": {
"start": { "line": 15, "character": 0 },
"end": { "line": 34, "character": 0 }
},
"title": "Request Pipeline",
"description": "This block wires validation, auth, and downstream execution."
}
Use when exact lines may drift:
{ "file": "src/app.ts", "pattern": "export default class App", "title": "Application Entry" }
Use for PRs, issues, or docs when helpful:
{ "uri": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/456", "title": "The PR" }
Each description should answer:
Keep descriptions compact, specific, and grounded in the actual code.
Use this arc unless the task clearly needs something different:
The tour should feel like a path, not an inventory.
{
"$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
"title": "API Service Tour",
"description": "Walkthrough of the request path for the payments service.",
"ref": "main",
"steps": [
{
"directory": "src",
"title": "Source Root",
"description": "All runtime code for the service starts here."
},
{
"file": "src/server.ts",
"line": 12,
"title": "Entry Point",
"description": "The server boots here and wires middleware before any route is reached."
},
{
"file": "src/routes/payments.ts",
"line": 8,
"title": "Payment Routes",
"description": "Every payments request enters through this router before hitting service logic."
},
{
"title": "Next Steps",
"description": "You can now follow any payment request end to end with the main anchors in place."
}
]
}
| Anti-pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| Flat file listing | Tell a story with dependency between steps |
| Generic descriptions | Name the concrete code path or pattern |
| Guessed anchors | Verify every file and line first |
| Too many steps for a quick tour | Cut aggressively |
| First step is content-only | Anchor the first step to a real file or directory |
| Persona mismatch | Write for the actual reader, not a generic engineer |
codebase-onboardingcoding-standardscouncilmicrosoft/codetour还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。
从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。
用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。
设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。
在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。
根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。