跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

config-gc

检查Claude Code配置中的重复技能、过时记忆和多余权限等项目,逐项提供依据并征求确认,通过停用或移存进行可撤销的整理,并记录修改与恢复方法。

原文查看原文说明

Garbage collection for your Claude Code configuration. Periodically scans ~/.claude (skills, memory, hooks, permissions, MCP servers, caches) for redundant, stale, orphaned, or low-value items, then walks the user through a confirm-each-deletion cleanup. Use when the user says "clean up my config", "config GC", "too many skills", "audit my setup", "my .claude is bloated", or asks for a periodic config review.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 批量安装技能后检查重复
  • 检查过时记忆和多余钩子
  • 整理重复的权限配置
  • 每月审查配置

中文介绍

功能

此技能检查Claude Code配置中积累的重复和多余项目,在获得用户确认后协助整理。检查范围包括技能、记忆、钩子、权限和MCP servers等,寻找未被引用的文件及过时信息。整理候选项会附上理由、大小和修改时间,优先展示依据较充分的项目。执行后,会在gc_log.md中记录修改内容与恢复方法。

适用场景

适合批量添加技能后发现用途重叠,或配置不断增加、难以管理的情况,也可用于每月检查。不会仅因某项配置较旧就认定它无用,季节性使用的配置等是否保留,由用户判断。

使用示例

  • “请检查Claude Code配置,列出整理候选项并说明理由。”
  • “请检查重复权限和未被引用的钩子。”
  • “请比较新添加的技能与现有技能,检查用途是否重叠。”

注意事项

每个候选项都需要单独确认,不采用批量批准。优先停用或移存,只有用户明确要求时才永久删除。编辑权限使用jq,并备份配置文件。项目源代码的整理不在范围内。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明配置整理、每月检查等使用场景,并排除项目源代码。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好列出八类检查对象、扫描命令,以及从逐项确认到记录日志的步骤。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好明确要求逐项确认、优先可恢复移除,并在修改权限前备份及记录恢复方法。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足流程使用Claude Code配置和jq,但未提供jq的安装步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Config GC — Garbage Collection for Claude Code Setups

Borrowed from runtime garbage collection: periodically scan for objects that are no longer referenced, redundant, expired, or low-value, and reclaim the space. The critical difference: here, collection requires a human in the loop. Never delete autonomously.

When to Activate

  • The user asks to clean up, audit, or slim down their Claude Code configuration
  • The user complains about too many skills, noisy hooks, or slow session startup
  • A monthly/periodic config review is due
  • After installing a large skill pack (e.g. this repo), to reconcile overlaps with existing setup

Do NOT activate for: cleaning project source code (that's refactoring), clearing chat history, or uninstalling Claude Code itself.

Design Philosophy

  1. Append-only configs leak. Skills, memory files, hooks, and permission entries only ever get added. Without periodic review they rot silently.
  2. Regular audits beat one-time purges. Scan every ~30 days, propose a small batch of candidates each time.
  3. Per-channel strategies. Each accumulation type (skills, hooks, permissions, ...) has its own staleness signals — don't apply one rule everywhere.
  4. Soft-delete first. Rename to .disabled > move to ~/.claude/_gc_trash/ > real deletion. Always keep an undo path.
  5. Forced human-in-the-loop. Every candidate gets its own [y/n/skip] confirmation. No "yes to all" shortcut.
  6. Keep a log. Every GC run appends to ~/.claude/gc_log.md: what was touched, why, and how to undo it.

Scan Channels

#ChannelPathStaleness / redundancy signals
1Skills~/.claude/skills/*/Heavily overlapping names; never triggered in recent transcripts; domain mismatch with the user's actual work; broken or empty SKILL.md
2Memory~/.claude/**/memory/*.md + its indexMultiple index entries for one topic; contents contradicting newer entries; dates that have passed; orphan files missing from the index; sub-100-word fragments that should merge
3Hooks~/.claude/hooks/ + settingsScripts present on disk but referenced by no hook config; old versions superseded by rewrites
4Permissionspermissions.allow in settings.json / settings.local.jsonDuplicate entries; specific entries already covered by a wildcard (e.g. Bash(git push) when Bash(*) is allowed); one-off grants from past experiments
5MCP servers~/.claude.json or project .mcp.jsonServers that fail to connect; functional duplicates; long-unused
6Scheduled reminders / jobswherever the user keeps themFired one-shots older than 30 days; jobs whose target scripts no longer exist
7Project history~/.claude/projects/*/Stale handoff snapshots; session records superseded by newer state
8Runtime cachescache/, file-history/, logs/, shell-snapshots/Sort by size and mtime; propose items >30 days old and large

Workflow

  1. Scan all channels (or the subset the user names). Collect candidates with: path, channel, signal that flagged it, size, last-modified.
  2. Rank by confidence (broken/orphaned = high; merely old = low) and present as a numbered table. Cap each run at ~20 candidates — GC is periodic, not exhaustive.
  3. Confirm one by one. For each candidate show the evidence, then ask [y/n/skip]. The user can stop at any point.
  4. Soft-delete confirmed items: prefer .disabled rename for skills/hooks and _gc_trash/<date>/ move for files. Permission entries live in JSON (no comments possible): back up the settings file, record each removed entry verbatim in gc_log.md, then remove it from the allow array with jq. Only hard-delete when the user explicitly asks.
  5. Log the run to ~/.claude/gc_log.md: timestamp, items actioned, undo instructions.
  6. Report: reclaimed size, channels still healthy, suggested next review date.

Example Scan Commands

Orphaned hook scripts (channel 3) — scripts on disk that no hook config references:

for f in ~/.claude/hooks/*; do
  name=$(basename "$f")
  grep -rq "$name" ~/.claude/settings.json ~/.claude/settings.local.json 2>/dev/null \
    || echo "ORPHAN: $f"
done

Redundant permission entries (channel 4) — duplicates, and specific grants shadowed by a wildcard:

jq -r '.permissions.allow[]' ~/.claude/settings.local.json | sort | uniq -d
if jq -e '.permissions.allow | index("Bash(*)")' ~/.claude/settings.local.json >/dev/null; then
  jq -r '.permissions.allow[]' ~/.claude/settings.local.json \
    | grep '^Bash(' | grep -vF 'Bash(*)'
fi

Largest stale caches (channel 8) — du -k instead of GNU-only find -printf, so it works on macOS/BSD too:

find ~/.claude/file-history ~/.claude/shell-snapshots -type f -mtime +30 \
  -exec du -k {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20

Soft-delete with undo path (capture the date once so the log can't disagree with the directory):

gc_date=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
mkdir -p ~/.claude/_gc_trash/$gc_date
mv ~/.claude/skills/dead-skill ~/.claude/_gc_trash/$gc_date/
echo "$(date -Iseconds) moved skills/dead-skill -> _gc_trash/$gc_date/ (undo: mv back)" >> ~/.claude/gc_log.md

Removing a confirmed-redundant permission entry (JSON has no comments — back up, log, then edit):

cp ~/.claude/settings.local.json ~/.claude/settings.local.json.bak
echo "$(date -Iseconds) removed permission entry: Bash(git push) (undo: restore from .bak or re-add)" >> ~/.claude/gc_log.md
jq '.permissions.allow -= ["Bash(git push)"]' ~/.claude/settings.local.json.bak \
  > ~/.claude/settings.local.json

Anti-Patterns

  • Bulk approval. Asking "delete all 15? [y/n]" defeats the design. One item, one decision.
  • Hard-deleting on first pass. If there's no _gc_trash/ copy or .disabled rename, you did it wrong.
  • Treating "old" as "dead". A skill untouched for 60 days may be seasonal (tax season, quarterly reviews). Age is a signal, not a verdict — that's why a human confirms.
  • Cleaning memory by truncation. Merging two contradicting memory files requires reading both and keeping the newer truth, not deleting the longer one.
  • Touching anything outside ~/.claude (or the project's .claude/). Config GC never wanders into source trees.

Best Practices

  • Run after big additions, not just on a calendar: installing a 50-skill pack is exactly when overlap with existing skills appears.
  • When two skills overlap, prefer disabling the one with the weaker trigger description — it's the one that was probably never firing anyway.
  • Permission cleanup is the highest-value channel per minute spent: redundant allow-entries make security review harder.
  • Keep gc_log.md forever. It's tiny, and "when did I disable that hook and why" comes up more often than you'd think.

Related Skills

  • skill-stocktake — audits skill quality; config-gc audits skill existence. Run stocktake on what survives GC.
  • workspace-surface-audit — the additive counterpart: recommends what to install. config-gc is the subtractive half of the same lifecycle.
  • configure-ecc — after installing skills with it, run config-gc to reconcile overlaps with your pre-existing setup.
  • continuous-learning — produces the memory files this skill later audits.
  • security-review — pairs well with the permissions channel.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

accessibility

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。

  • 为纯图标按钮添加说明
  • 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
  • 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。

  • 排查仅在应用内出现的故障
  • 调查旧对话混入回答的原因
  • 核对工具漏执行或虚报执行
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-harness-construction

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。

  • 设计智能体工具及输入格式
  • 明确工具结果与下一步行动
  • 制定安全重试与停止条件
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。

  • 诊断代理连续失败
  • 调查重复调用工具的循环
  • 检查上下文积累导致的输出退化
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月5日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题