跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

customer-billing-ops

Handle customer billing issues with connected tools such as Stripe. Review subscriptions and invoices, classify the problem, address refunds or cancellations, and prepare a handoff with revenue impact, customer follow-up text, and product gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Operate customer billing workflows such as subscriptions, refunds, churn triage, billing-portal recovery, and plan analysis using connected billing tools like Stripe. Use when the user needs to help a customer, inspect subscription state, or manage revenue-impacting billing operations.

集成工具Stripe
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Investigating duplicate subscriptions or unexpected charges
  • Handling failed renewals and payment method problems
  • Restoring access to billing and cancellation controls
  • Reviewing plan mix and team seat confusion

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Customer Billing Ops

Use this skill for real customer operations, not generic payment API design.

The goal is to help the operator answer: who is this customer, what happened, what is the safest fix, and what follow-up should we send?

When to Use

  • Customer says billing is broken, they want a refund, or they cannot cancel
  • Investigating duplicate subscriptions, accidental charges, failed renewals, or churn risk
  • Reviewing plan mix, active subscriptions, yearly vs monthly conversion, or team-seat confusion
  • Creating or validating a billing portal flow
  • Auditing support complaints that touch subscriptions, invoices, refunds, or payment methods

Preferred Tool Surface

  • Use connected billing tools such as Stripe first
  • Use email, GitHub, or issue trackers only as supporting evidence
  • Prefer hosted billing/customer portals over custom account-management code when the platform already provides the needed controls

Guardrails

  • Never expose secret keys, full card details, or unnecessary customer PII in the response
  • Do not refund blindly; first classify the issue
  • Distinguish among:
    • accidental duplicate purchase
    • deliberate multi-seat or team purchase
    • broken product / unmet value
    • failed or incomplete checkout
    • cancellation due to missing self-serve controls
  • For annual plans, team plans, and prorated states, verify the contract shape before taking action

Workflow

1. Identify the customer cleanly

Start from the strongest identifier available:

  • customer email
  • Stripe customer ID
  • subscription ID
  • invoice ID
  • GitHub username or support email if it is known to map back to billing

Return a concise identity summary:

  • customer
  • active subscriptions
  • canceled subscriptions
  • invoices
  • obvious anomalies such as duplicate active subscriptions

2. Classify the issue

Put the case into one bucket before acting:

CaseTypical action
Duplicate personal subscriptioncancel extras, consider refund
Real multi-seat/team intentpreserve seats, clarify billing model
Failed payment / incomplete checkoutrecover via portal or update payment method
Missing self-serve controlsprovide portal, cancellation path, or invoice access
Product failure or trust breakrefund, apologize, log product issue

3. Take the safest reversible action first

Preferred order:

  1. restore self-serve management
  2. fix duplicate or broken billing state
  3. refund only the affected charge or duplicate
  4. document the reason
  5. send a short customer follow-up

If the fix requires product work, separate:

  • customer remediation now
  • product bug / workflow gap for backlog

4. Check operator-side product gaps

If the customer pain comes from a missing operator surface, call it out explicitly. Common examples:

  • no billing portal
  • no usage/rate-limit visibility
  • no plan/seat explanation
  • no cancellation flow
  • no duplicate-subscription guard

Treat those as ECC or website follow-up items, not just support incidents.

5. Produce the operator handoff

End with:

  • customer state summary
  • action taken
  • revenue impact
  • follow-up text to send
  • product or backlog issue to create

Output Format

Use this structure:

CUSTOMER
- name / email
- relevant account identifiers

BILLING STATE
- active subscriptions
- invoice or renewal state
- anomalies

DECISION
- issue classification
- why this action is correct

ACTION TAKEN
- refund / cancel / portal / no-op

FOLLOW-UP
- short customer message

PRODUCT GAP
- what should be fixed in the product or website

Examples of Good Recommendations

  • "The right fix is a billing portal, not a custom dashboard yet"
  • "This looks like duplicate personal checkout, not a real team-seat purchase"
  • "Refund one duplicate charge, keep the remaining active subscription, then convert the customer to org billing later if needed"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题