跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ecc-recipes

Find the ECC command sequence for a development task, including the order to run commands and when to stop. It reads current command files, groups related workflows, and provides guidance without executing them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Map a described workflow to the right ECC command group with run-order and stop condition, or browse all command-group recipe families read live from the commands directory. Advisory only — never executes. Use when asked which commands run a workflow, the command sequence for a task, or to list ECC pipelines; not for executing the task (route to the command itself), single-command docs (use ecc-guide), or prompt rewrites (use prompt-optimizer).

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Finding the command sequence for a bug fix
  • Choosing commands for building an MVP
  • Browsing available ECC workflow groups
  • Defining when an autonomous loop should stop

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

ECC Recipes

One entry point for "which group of ECC slash-commands runs my workflow, in what order, and when do I stop." Also browses every command-group recipe family.

Fills the gap between two existing skills:

  • ecc-guide — lists commands and where to read docs, but as a flat catalog.
  • prompt-optimizer — matches a task to components, but outputs a single prompt, not a multi-command group with run-order and stop condition.

This skill adds: family grouping + run-order + stop condition.

When to Activate

  • "Which command group do I run for <workflow>?"
  • "What's the command sequence to build an MVP / fix a defect / refactor?"
  • "Show me all ECC command-group recipes" (catalog mode)
  • "How many workflow pipelines does ECC have?"
  • User invokes /ecc-recipes with or without a description.

Do Not Use When

  • User wants the task done now — route to the actual command, don't describe it.
  • User wants deep docs for ONE command — use ecc-guide.
  • User wants a draft prompt rewritten — use prompt-optimizer.

Core Principle

Answer from current files, not memory. The command set changes; never hardcode counts or member lists. Read the live commands/ directory each run, then classify into families.

Live reads

Resolve the commands directory (first that exists), then list names:

for D in \
  "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/ecc/commands \
  "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/ecc/ecc/*/commands \
  ./commands \
  ./.claude/commands \
  "$HOME"/.claude/commands; do
  [ -d "$D" ] && CMD_DIR="$D" && break
done
[ -z "${CMD_DIR:-}" ] && { echo "No ECC commands directory found."; return 1; }
find "$CMD_DIR" -maxdepth 1 -name '*.md' -exec basename {} .md \; | sort

Optionally read manifests/install-*.json if present for richer grouping. Use the smallest set of reads needed.

Family Classification (by prefix)

Group command names by leading prefix; map known singletons by hand. Families are derived live — the table below is the classification rule, not a frozen list.

Family prefixRecipe meaningTypical run-order
orch-*gated Research, Plan, TDD, Review, Commit per task typepick one orch-* by task kind; it runs its own internal phases
multi-*multi-model workflowmulti-plan then multi-execute then review (or multi-workflow end-to-end)
prp-*PRD to plan to implement to PR pipelineprp-prd then prp-plan then prp-implement then prp-commit then prp-pr
epic-*large multi-unit epic, parallelepic-decompose then epic-claim then epic-validate then epic-review then epic-unblock then epic-sync then epic-publish
loop-*managed autonomous loop and monitorloop-start <pattern> then watch with loop-status
gan-*generator and evaluator loopgan-build (code) or gan-design (UI); self-looping
*-build / *-review / *-testper-language CI triad<lang>-test (TDD) then <lang>-build (fix) then <lang>-review
hookify-*behavior-hook managementhookify then hookify-list then hookify-configure
learn / instinct-* / evolve / promote / prunecontinuous-learninglearn then instinct-status then evolve then promote
singletonssanta-loop, plan, plan-prd, pr, code-review, checkpoint, etc.standalone or glue between groups

Any command not matching a prefix rule → list it under singletons with its one-line description.

How It Works

1. Live-read command names from CMD_DIR.
2. Classify into families by prefix and a singleton map.
3. If a workflow description was given -> MATCH MODE.
   If none -> CATALOG MODE.
4. Advisory only: print the plan. Never run the matched commands.

Catalog mode (no description)

Output the family table: each family, member count, members, one-line meaning, typical run-order. End with the total command count and a prompt to describe a workflow for a matched recipe.

Match mode (description given)

  1. Restate the workflow in one sentence.
  2. Pick the best 1-2 families; say WHY in one line each.
  3. Run-order block — exact command sequence for the matched family.
  4. Stop condition — always explicit (max-runs, completion-signal, review-passes, or single-shot). For autonomous loops, warn about subscription burn and recommend a backstop bound.
  5. Where to read — the commands/<name>.md path plus /ecc-guide <name>.

Output Template (match mode)

Workflow: <one-sentence restatement>

Best fit: <family> — <why>
(Alt: <family> — <why>)

Run-order:
  /<cmd1>   # job
  /<cmd2>   # job
  /<cmd3>   # job
  STOP when: <condition>
  WARNING (autonomous loops only): an unbounded loop burns subscription/credits —
  add a max-iteration or max-cost backstop alongside the completion signal.

Read full docs:
  commands/<cmd1>.md   (or: /ecc-guide <cmd1>)

Examples

Catalog: /ecc-recipes → prints the family table and total count.

Match: /ecc-recipes plan a whole app upfront then auto-build with adversarial review until done → Best fit: loop-* (autonomous) wrapping gan-* or santa-loop (adversarial). Run-order: plan-prd then loop-start rfc-dag --mode safe then monitor loop-status; STOP when all units pass review N consecutive times (add a max-iteration backstop to bound burn).

Match: /ecc-recipes fix a bug in my Go service → Best fit: orch-fix-defect (reproduce, fix, review, commit). Alt: go-test then go-build then go-review. STOP: regression test green and review pass.

Non-Goals

  • Not an executor — advisory only.
  • Not per-command deep docs — that's ecc-guide.
  • Not prompt rewriting — that's prompt-optimizer.
  • Never hardcode command counts or member lists — always live-read.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题