跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

homelab-network-readiness

Plan and review home network changes before altering settings. The skill checks VLANs, which separate device groups, local DNS filtering, and VPN access, then organizes staged changes, validation checks, and recovery steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Readiness checklist for homelab VLAN segmentation, local DNS filtering (Pi-hole, AdGuard Home), and WireGuard-style remote access. Use when planning or reviewing home network changes — splitting a flat network into trusted, IoT, guest, or management VLANs, moving DHCP to a local resolver, or adding VPN access — before changing router, firewall, DHCP, or VPN configuration.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Separating trusted, IoT, and guest devices
  • Planning a move to local DNS filtering
  • Reviewing remote VPN access
  • Checking recovery paths before network changes

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Homelab Network Readiness

Use this skill before changing a home or small-lab network that mixes VLANs, Pi-hole or another local DNS resolver, firewall rules, and remote VPN access.

This is a planning and review skill. Do not turn it into copy-paste router, firewall, or VPN configuration unless the target platform, current topology, rollback path, console access, and maintenance window are all known.

When to Use

  • Preparing to split a flat network into trusted, IoT, guest, server, or management VLANs.
  • Moving DHCP clients to Pi-hole, AdGuard Home, Unbound, or another local DNS resolver.
  • Adding WireGuard, Tailscale, ZeroTier, OpenVPN, or router-native VPN access.
  • Reviewing whether a homelab change can lock the operator out of the gateway, switch, access point, DNS server, or VPN server.
  • Turning an informal home-network idea into a staged migration plan with validation evidence.

Safety Rules

  • Keep the first answer read-only: inventory, risks, staged plan, validation, and rollback.
  • Do not expose gateway admin panels, DNS resolvers, SSH, NAS consoles, or VPN management UIs directly to the public internet.
  • Do not provide firewall, NAT, VLAN, DHCP, or VPN commands without a confirmed platform and a rollback procedure.
  • Require out-of-band or same-room console access before changing management VLANs, trunk ports, firewall default policies, or DHCP/DNS settings.
  • Keep a working path back to the internet before pointing the whole network at a new DNS resolver or VPN route.
  • Treat IoT, guest, camera, and lab-server networks as different trust zones until the operator explicitly chooses otherwise.

Required Inventory

Collect this before giving implementation steps:

AreaQuestions
Internet edgeWhat is the modem or ONT? Is the ISP router bridged or still routing?
GatewayWhat routes, firewalls, handles DHCP, and terminates VPNs?
SwitchingWhich switch ports are uplinks, access ports, trunks, or unmanaged?
Wi-FiWhich SSIDs map to which networks, and are APs wired or mesh?
AddressingWhat subnets exist today, and which ranges conflict with VPN sites?
DNS/DHCPWhich service currently hands out leases and resolver addresses?
ManagementHow will the operator reach the gateway, switch, and AP after changes?
RecoveryWhat can be reverted locally if DNS, DHCP, VLANs, or VPN routes break?

VLAN And Trust-Zone Plan

Start with intent rather than vendor syntax.

ZoneTypical contentsDefault policy
TrustedLaptops, phones, admin workstationsCan reach shared services and management only when needed
ServersNAS, Home Assistant, lab hosts, DNS resolverAccepts narrow inbound flows from trusted clients
IoTTVs, smart plugs, cameras, speakersInternet access plus explicit exceptions only
GuestVisitor devicesInternet-only, no LAN reachability
ManagementGateway, switches, APs, controllersReachable only from trusted admin devices
VPNRemote clientsSame or narrower access than trusted clients

Before recommending VLAN IDs or subnets, confirm:

  1. The gateway supports inter-VLAN routing and firewall rules.
  2. The switch supports the required tagged and untagged port behavior.
  3. The APs can map SSIDs to VLANs.
  4. The operator knows which port they are connected through during the change.
  5. The management network remains reachable after trunk and SSID changes.

DNS Filtering Readiness

Pi-hole or another local resolver should be introduced as a dependency, not as a single point of failure.

  1. Give the resolver a reserved address before using it in DHCP options.
  2. Confirm it can resolve public DNS and local home.arpa names.
  3. Keep the gateway or a second resolver available as a temporary fallback.
  4. Test one client or one VLAN before changing every DHCP scope.
  5. Document which networks may bypass filtering and why.
  6. Check that blocking rules do not break captive portals, work VPNs, firmware updates, or medical/security devices.

Useful validation evidence:

Client gets expected DHCP lease
Client receives expected DNS resolver
Public DNS lookup succeeds
Local home.arpa lookup succeeds
Blocked test domain is blocked only where intended
Gateway and DNS admin interfaces are not reachable from guest or IoT networks

Remote Access Readiness

For WireGuard-style access, decide what the VPN is allowed to reach before generating keys or opening ports.

ModeUse whenRisk notes
Split tunnel to one subnetRemote admin for NAS or lab hostsKeep route list narrow
Split tunnel to trusted servicesAccess selected apps by IP or DNSRequires precise firewall rules
Full tunnelUntrusted networks or travelMore bandwidth and DNS responsibility
Overlay VPNSimpler remote access with identity controlsStill needs ACL review

Do not recommend port forwarding until the operator confirms:

  • The VPN endpoint is patched and actively maintained.
  • The forwarded port goes only to the VPN service, not an admin UI.
  • Dynamic DNS, public IP behavior, and ISP CGNAT status are understood.
  • Peer keys can be revoked without rebuilding the whole network.
  • Logs or connection status can verify who connected and when.

Change Sequence

Prefer small, reversible changes:

  1. Snapshot the current topology, IP plan, DHCP settings, DNS settings, and firewall rules.
  2. Reserve infrastructure addresses for gateway, DNS, controller, APs, NAS, and VPN endpoint.
  3. Create the new zone or VLAN without moving critical devices.
  4. Move one test client and validate DHCP, DNS, routing, internet, and block behavior.
  5. Add narrow firewall exceptions for required flows.
  6. Move one low-risk device group.
  7. Add VPN access with the narrowest route and firewall policy that satisfies the use case.
  8. Document final state, known exceptions, and rollback commands or UI steps.

Review Checklist

  • Each network has a reason to exist and a clear trust boundary.
  • No management interface is reachable from guest, IoT, or the public internet.
  • DNS failure does not take down the operator's ability to recover locally.
  • DHCP scope changes were tested on one client before broad rollout.
  • VPN clients receive only the routes and DNS settings they need.
  • Firewall rules are default-deny between zones, with named exceptions.
  • The operator can still reach gateway, switch, AP, DNS, and VPN admin surfaces.
  • Rollback is documented in the same vocabulary as the chosen platform UI or CLI.

Anti-Patterns

  • Segmenting networks before knowing which switch ports and SSIDs carry which VLANs.
  • Moving the admin workstation off the only reachable management network.
  • Pointing all DHCP scopes at a Pi-hole before testing fallback DNS.
  • Publishing NAS, DNS, router, or hypervisor management directly to the internet.
  • Treating VPN access as equivalent to full trusted-LAN access.
  • Adding allow-all firewall rules temporarily and forgetting to remove them.
  • Copying commands from another vendor or firmware version without checking the exact platform syntax.

See Also

  • Skill: homelab-network-setup
  • Skill: network-config-validation
  • Skill: network-interface-health

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题