跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

ito-training

检查已完成预订的Itô GPU环境是否可用于机器学习训练。目前不执行训练,而是说明尚未提供的功能,并整理未来交接所需的条件。

原文查看原文说明

Inspect the availability of ML training on a completed Itô compute booking and, when the canonical backend becomes available, hand off an explicitly confirmed training manifest. Use after ito-compute has booked GPU nodes and the user wants pre-training, fine-tuning, or RL on that metal. ECC implements no training stack of its own.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 预订GPU后确认能否训练
  • 查看微调任务的交接要求
  • 整理预订、预算和确认要求

中文介绍

功能

ito-training用于确认已预订的Itô GPU环境是否支持机器学习训练。目前训练功能尚未提供;此技能会说明这一限制,并整理未来交接所需的条件。范围包括预训练、微调和强化学习,但当前均无法执行。

未来计划使用训练清单,即记录训练内容的JSON文档。其设计包含模型版本、数据引用位置、训练目标、预算上限,以及保存中间进度的策略。

适用场景

适合在通过ito-compute完成GPU预订后,了解是否能在该环境开始训练。也可用于梳理未来执行时对预订有效性、费用和确认流程的要求。

使用示例

  • “检查我预订的Itô环境是否支持训练。”
  • “整理微调任务交接所需的信息和确认条件。”

注意事项

当前流程在身份验证或执行命令前停止,不会以本地训练或SSH操作替代。未来执行也必须使用服务器验证过的预订,并取得与训练内容和费用绑定的单独确认。凭据不应出现在清单或对话中。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明训练尚未提供,当前仅确认预订后的可用性并整理未来要求。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好具体规定当前停止条件及未来train参数、JSON字段和确认要求。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好在认证或执行前停止,未来还要求验证预订、绑定费用的确认及排除凭据。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足需要ito-compute预订及未来的后端,但该训练功能目前尚未提供。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Itô Training

ito-training is the canonical ECC skill for training on Itô compute. ECC never runs a trainer, scheduler, or data pipeline of its own; it never books, reserves, or spends. This skill chains off a completed booking from ito-compute.

Current production boundary

Managed training is unavailable today. The ECC bridge exposes only login, logout, auth, find, status, and explicitly gated evals. It has no train verb, and the canonical CLI's run verb and desk training-run backend remain scaffolds. The locally enforceable guarantee is that ECC rejects train before resolving or spawning the credential-bearing canonical client.

Therefore stop before authentication or any command invocation. Report the missing capability and return to the originating agent. Never substitute a local trainer, SSH helper, browser workflow, or purchase endpoint.

Required entitlement

When training is implemented, its first gate is a server-verified completed booking. Harness memory, an RFQ, a quote, node IPs, or SSH access are not proof of entitlement. The backend must return fresh training eligibility bound to the authenticated account, booking, GPU topology, region, fabric, and term. Expired, revoked, mismatched, incomplete, or already-released bookings fail closed before confirmation.

Future CLI and API contract

The intended command name is train. The future handoff must be equivalent to:

ecc ito train \
  --booking <server-verified-booking-id> \
  --manifest <absolute-reviewed-json-file> \
  --confirmation-ref <opaque-non-authorizing-reference> \
  --idempotency-key <stable-retry-key> \
  --json

The reviewed manifest must identify the model size and revision, data references with decontamination provenance, training target, post-training recipe, budget ceiling in USD, checkpoint policy, and maximum incremental cost. No raw API key, SSH key, node password, bearer token, or dataset credential belongs in arguments, manifests, logs, MCP results, or chat.

The client must canonicalize the manifest path, reject symlinks, open a regular file without following links, require appropriate ownership and restrictive permissions, enforce a bounded size, and hash bytes from the opened descriptor. That digest must exactly equal the digest bound into confirmation before any workload mutation. A path swap, digest mismatch, oversized file, or mutable unsafe file fails closed.

The canonical API—not ECC—must own workload creation and return structured JSON with ok, live_api_contacted, notice, and either data or error. Training data must include stable booking, run, manifest, and idempotency IDs plus a state enum. Errors must include a stable code and safe message without secrets.

Confirmation and execution gates

Before workload creation, require all of the following:

  1. Fresh entitlement and training eligibility from the canonical backend.
  2. A reviewable immutable manifest and deterministic digest.
  3. A separate single-use confirmation bound to account, action, manifest, and cost, with a short expiry and replay protection. CLI arguments carry only an opaque, non-authorizing confirmation reference; the server resolves and consumes the bearer capability out of band.
  4. A caller-supplied idempotency key reserved atomically with the run.
  5. Server-side fabric, capacity, data-policy, checkpoint-storage, and cost validation, including the manifest's budget ceiling.

Authentication is identity, not workload authority. A login, API key, quote, or completed booking never substitutes for the training confirmation. Inspection and plan generation must not create a workload. Cancel and cleanup are separate mutations with their own scoped confirmation and idempotency boundaries.

Lifecycle and recovery

The production surface is incomplete until the same canonical client exposes tenant-scoped status, logs, metrics, checkpoint listing, cancel, and cleanup. Every operation needs bounded connect and overall timeouts, revocation-aware errors, and structured output. After an ambiguous transport failure, query status by the idempotency key before retrying; never create a second run merely because the first response was lost. A revoked credential stops polling and returns control to the originating agent without starting login automatically.

Report stage gates honestly; never override a failed eval gate. Cleanup must be observable and must not release or modify the underlying booking unless that separate economic action was explicitly authorized.

Proposed backend stages

These stages describe the future backend (Layer 0.3), not code that exists in ECC:

  1. Data prep — manifest, dedup, decontamination against the eval suite; 150M-ladder decision job as the cheap pre-check for custom data.
  2. Parallelism and precision — selected from model size, node count, fabric; wasteful combinations refused.
  3. Checkpointing and fault tolerance — async DCP, torchft; detect < 10 min, resume < 15 min. Loss-spike restart is a proposed, human-gated action.
  4. Curriculum and eval gates — staged pretrain / mid-train / long-context / post-training, each with a fixed eval battery; a failed gate stops the run.
  5. Post-training — SFT → DPO → RLVR (GRPO with DAPO stability fixes), trainer/rollout separation with bounded staleness.

The backend emits desk telemetry (goodput, interruption rate, checkpoint bandwidth) so the desk prices training blocks honestly.

Until every gate and lifecycle operation above exists in the canonical runtime, this skill remains a fail-closed availability check and documentation handoff.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题