跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

nestjs-patterns

用于设计和审查NestJS的API与服务,梳理按功能划分的代码结构、输入验证、身份认证、异常处理、环境配置和测试,支持面向实际运行的实现。

原文查看原文说明

NestJS architecture patterns for modules, controllers, providers, DTO validation, guards, interceptors, config, and production-grade TypeScript backends. Use when building or reviewing a NestJS backend — modules, providers, DTO validation, guards, or interceptors.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 规划NestJS的API结构
  • 实现输入验证与访问控制
  • 审查异常处理和环境配置
  • 测试服务与HTTP接口

中文介绍

功能

在使用NestJS开发API或服务时,梳理代码结构、输入验证、身份认证、异常处理和测试。按功能拆分模块,明确控制器与服务的职责:控制器负责HTTP输入输出,服务负责业务逻辑。同时涵盖对DTO这种数据传输类型的验证,以及避免在响应中暴露内部信息的设计。

适用场景

适合规划新后端的结构,或审查已有实现。可整理实际运行前需要检查的事项,包括访问控制、统一错误响应、启动时检查环境变量,以及分离数据库操作。测试既涵盖独立服务,也涵盖HTTP请求。

使用示例

  • “设计一个NestJS用户管理API,按功能拆分模块和服务。”
  • “审查输入验证、访问控制和错误响应。”
  • “使用与生产环境相同的验证配置编写API测试。”

注意事项

面向使用NestJS和TypeScript的后端。输入验证示例使用class-validator。与Prisma或TypeORM的集成方式根据项目采用的结构确定。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好启用场景明确列出API开发、身份认证、环境配置和测试。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好提供目录结构及DTO验证、守卫、异常过滤器和测试的代码示例。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好未要求执行删除或对外发送,并要求响应排除认证信息。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足使用NestJS和class-validator,但未提供安装步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

NestJS Development Patterns

Production-grade NestJS patterns for modular TypeScript backends.

When to Activate

  • Building NestJS APIs or services
  • Structuring modules, controllers, and providers
  • Adding DTO validation, guards, interceptors, or exception filters
  • Configuring environment-aware settings and database integrations
  • Testing NestJS units or HTTP endpoints

Project Structure

src/
├── app.module.ts
├── main.ts
├── common/
│   ├── filters/
│   ├── guards/
│   ├── interceptors/
│   └── pipes/
├── config/
│   ├── configuration.ts
│   └── validation.ts
├── modules/
│   ├── auth/
│   │   ├── auth.controller.ts
│   │   ├── auth.module.ts
│   │   ├── auth.service.ts
│   │   ├── dto/
│   │   ├── guards/
│   │   └── strategies/
│   └── users/
│       ├── dto/
│       ├── entities/
│       ├── users.controller.ts
│       ├── users.module.ts
│       └── users.service.ts
└── prisma/ or database/
  • Keep domain code inside feature modules.
  • Put cross-cutting filters, decorators, guards, and interceptors in common/.
  • Keep DTOs close to the module that owns them.

Bootstrap and Global Validation

async function bootstrap() {
  const app = await NestFactory.create(AppModule, { bufferLogs: true });

  app.useGlobalPipes(
    new ValidationPipe({
      whitelist: true,
      forbidNonWhitelisted: true,
      transform: true,
      transformOptions: { enableImplicitConversion: true },
    }),
  );

  app.useGlobalInterceptors(new ClassSerializerInterceptor(app.get(Reflector)));
  app.useGlobalFilters(new HttpExceptionFilter());

  await app.listen(process.env.PORT ?? 3000);
}
bootstrap();
  • Always enable whitelist and forbidNonWhitelisted on public APIs.
  • Prefer one global validation pipe instead of repeating validation config per route.

Modules, Controllers, and Providers

@Module({
  controllers: [UsersController],
  providers: [UsersService],
  exports: [UsersService],
})
export class UsersModule {}

@Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
  constructor(private readonly usersService: UsersService) {}

  @Get(':id')
  getById(@Param('id', ParseUUIDPipe) id: string) {
    return this.usersService.getById(id);
  }

  @Post()
  create(@Body() dto: CreateUserDto) {
    return this.usersService.create(dto);
  }
}

@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
  constructor(private readonly usersRepo: UsersRepository) {}

  async create(dto: CreateUserDto) {
    return this.usersRepo.create(dto);
  }
}
  • Controllers should stay thin: parse HTTP input, call a provider, return response DTOs.
  • Put business logic in injectable services, not controllers.
  • Export only the providers other modules genuinely need.

DTOs and Validation

export class CreateUserDto {
  @IsEmail()
  email!: string;

  @IsString()
  @Length(2, 80)
  name!: string;

  @IsOptional()
  @IsEnum(UserRole)
  role?: UserRole;
}
  • Validate every request DTO with class-validator.
  • Use dedicated response DTOs or serializers instead of returning ORM entities directly.
  • Avoid leaking internal fields such as password hashes, tokens, or audit columns.

Auth, Guards, and Request Context

@UseGuards(JwtAuthGuard, RolesGuard)
@Roles('admin')
@Get('admin/report')
getAdminReport(@Req() req: AuthenticatedRequest) {
  return this.reportService.getForUser(req.user.id);
}
  • Keep auth strategies and guards module-local unless they are truly shared.
  • Encode coarse access rules in guards, then do resource-specific authorization in services.
  • Prefer explicit request types for authenticated request objects.

Exception Filters and Error Shape

@Catch()
export class HttpExceptionFilter implements ExceptionFilter {
  catch(exception: unknown, host: ArgumentsHost) {
    const response = host.switchToHttp().getResponse<Response>();
    const request = host.switchToHttp().getRequest<Request>();

    if (exception instanceof HttpException) {
      return response.status(exception.getStatus()).json({
        path: request.url,
        error: exception.getResponse(),
      });
    }

    return response.status(500).json({
      path: request.url,
      error: 'Internal server error',
    });
  }
}
  • Keep one consistent error envelope across the API.
  • Throw framework exceptions for expected client errors; log and wrap unexpected failures centrally.

Config and Environment Validation

ConfigModule.forRoot({
  isGlobal: true,
  load: [configuration],
  validate: validateEnv,
});
  • Validate env at boot, not lazily at first request.
  • Keep config access behind typed helpers or config services.
  • Split dev/staging/prod concerns in config factories instead of branching throughout feature code.

Persistence and Transactions

  • Keep repository / ORM code behind providers that speak domain language.
  • For Prisma or TypeORM, isolate transactional workflows in services that own the unit of work.
  • Do not let controllers coordinate multi-step writes directly.

Testing

describe('UsersController', () => {
  let app: INestApplication;

  beforeAll(async () => {
    const moduleRef = await Test.createTestingModule({
      imports: [UsersModule],
    }).compile();

    app = moduleRef.createNestApplication();
    app.useGlobalPipes(new ValidationPipe({ whitelist: true, transform: true }));
    await app.init();
  });
});
  • Unit test providers in isolation with mocked dependencies.
  • Add request-level tests for guards, validation pipes, and exception filters.
  • Reuse the same global pipes/filters in tests that you use in production.

Production Defaults

  • Enable structured logging and request correlation ids.
  • Terminate on invalid env/config instead of booting partially.
  • Prefer async provider initialization for DB/cache clients with explicit health checks.
  • Keep background jobs and event consumers in their own modules, not inside HTTP controllers.
  • Make rate limiting, auth, and audit logging explicit for public endpoints.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题