依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。
- 为纯图标按钮添加说明
- 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
- 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
在浏览器中打开本地计划书或HTML文件,通过针对具体内容的批注和聊天接收批准或修改请求。保存文件后页面会更新,可在同一页面继续审阅。
Open plans and HTML artifacts in a local browser canvas where the human annotates elements, chats, and approves or requests changes without leaving the page. Use when presenting a plan for review, or when feedback like "move this, change that" is easier pointed at than typed.
在浏览器中展示本地Markdown计划书或HTML文件,通过批注和聊天进行审阅。使用者可指定需要修改的元素或文字,发送批准或修改请求。代理以JSON格式接收反馈,并在同一页面回复。编辑文件并保存后,页面随之更新,也可查看使用Mermaid编写的图表。
适合获取实施计划的批准,或围绕设计、比较资料、报告的具体位置展开讨论。“把这一部分移过去”“修改这段说明”等意见可以直接关联到目标内容。修改后,仍可在同一页面继续检查。
使用ecc-universal附带的ecc-plan-canvas。仅支持本地.md和.html文件,不适用于远程URL、运行中的网页应用或代码差异审查。Mermaid从CDN加载,离线时显示图表源码。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。
总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Review loop for plans and visual artifacts: you write the artifact, the human reviews it in the browser — annotating the exact element they mean, chatting, and delivering an Approve plan / Request changes verdict — while you block on a single CLI call that returns their feedback as JSON.
Inspired by lavish-axi; rebuilt
ECC-native around the /plan confirmation gate, with zero dependencies.
.claude/plans/*.plan.md from /plan) and
need the CONFIRM/approve decision — the canvas verdict replaces a typed
"yes/proceed"..md / .html artifact./plan-canvas, a visual review, or "open it in the browser".Do NOT use for: code review of diffs (/code-review), running web apps, or
remote URLs. The canvas serves local artifact files only.
Invoke the CLI as ecc-plan-canvas — the bin shipped by the ecc-universal
package (on PATH after a global/plugin install; node "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/plan-canvas.js"
also works for plugin installs). Run it from the project you are reviewing in;
it works from any working directory. It manages a detached loopback server
(127.0.0.1:4517) shared by all sessions, keyed by artifact path — no session
ids to track.
The workflow is a plain CLI-plus-JSON loop, so it is model- and harness-agnostic:
any agent that can run a shell command and read stdout drives it the same way
(Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, OpenCode, Copilot). Trigger it however your
harness surfaces skills — e.g. /plan-canvas in Claude Code, $plan-canvas in
Codex — or just run the ecc-plan-canvas commands directly.
# 1. Open the artifact in the user's browser (returns immediately)
ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/feature.plan.md
# 2. Block until the human responds. Leave running; re-run if interrupted:
# queued feedback is never lost.
ecc-plan-canvas await .claude/plans/feature.plan.md
Feedback only reaches you while an await is actually parked on the session.
If your turn ends with nothing listening, the message sits in the queue and,
from the human's side of the glass, sending appears to do nothing at all.
So run await as a background task when your harness supports one (in
Claude Code, a Bash call with run_in_background: true). It exits the moment
feedback arrives and the harness hands you the JSON, which keeps the loop alive
across turns instead of dying with the foreground call. A foreground await
works too, but only until the harness time-limits it.
Two backstops exist, and neither is an excuse to skip the above:
ecc-plan-canvas pending lists feedback queued with no listener. Check it
whenever you are unsure whether you missed something.stop:plan-canvas-pending hook blocks your turn from ending while canvas
feedback is undelivered, and hands you the messages. If you are reading
feedback from that hook, you stopped listening too early.await prints JSON when the human acts:
{
"status": "feedback",
"items": [
{ "kind": "annotation", "text": "Split this into two phases",
"anchor": { "selector": "h2:nth-of-type(3)", "tag": "h2", "snippet": "Phase 2: Migration" } },
{ "kind": "verdict", "verdict": "request-changes" }
]
}
kind: "chat" — freeform message; answer in the canvas, not the terminal.kind: "annotation" — feedback anchored to an element (anchor.selector,
anchor.snippet show what they pointed at; anchor.textRange.text when
they highlighted a passage).kind: "verdict" — approve means the plan is CONFIRMED: stop polling,
end the session, and start implementing. request-changes means revise the
artifact (the canvas live-reloads it) and keep the loop going.3. Always respond in the canvas, then keep listening. One command does both:
ecc-plan-canvas await <file> --reply "Split Phase 2 as requested. Take a look."
Every human message gets a reply in the canvas, even a one-liner like "On it, rewriting the risk table now." Silence in the chat panel is indistinguishable from a broken canvas, which is exactly the failure this loop exists to prevent. Answer there, not only in the terminal.
While you work, keep the chat honest with the activity indicator:
# animated "agent is thinking..." bubble; refresh it during long work
ecc-plan-canvas typing <file> --state thinking
# switch to "agent is typing..." just before a reply lands
ecc-plan-canvas typing <file> --state typing
await sets thinking for you the moment it hands you a batch, and --reply
clears it. Both states self-expire, so a crashed agent decays to an honest
"queued" instead of leaving the human watching dots forever. Refresh thinking
if a revision takes more than a minute.
4. End when review concludes: ecc-plan-canvas end <file>.
When part of the plan is a flow, architecture, sequence, state machine, ER
model, or dependency graph, author it as a fenced ```mermaid block instead
of ASCII art or a wall of prose — the canvas renders it as a themed diagram the
human can point at. Reach for it when a picture reads faster than a paragraph;
skip it for simple lists or tables.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A[Market resolves] --> B{Watchers?}
B -->|yes| C[Enqueue jobs] --> D[Fan-out worker]
```
Diagrams render in the ECC dark theme with the accent palette. Mermaid loads in
the browser from a pinned CDN; if that is unavailable (offline), the block
degrades to showing its source, so the review is never blocked. Point a local
mirror at ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_MERMAID_URL for air-gapped use.
.html artifacts render as-is with the annotation layer injected. For HTML
authoring guidance use the frontend-design-direction and artifact-design
skills.open to refresh.{"status": "ended", "endedBy": "user"} (or sessionEnded: true on a
feedback batch) means the user closed the review: stop polling, deliver
remaining updates in chat, and do not reopen. A plain open on that
session is refused; pass --reopen only when the user asks to resume.ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_IDLE_MS); stop shuts it down explicitly. State lives
in ~/.claude/plan-canvas/ (ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_STATE_DIR).Plan approval flow — /plan writes
.claude/plans/notifications.plan.md and must WAIT for confirmation:
ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
ecc-plan-canvas await .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
# → {"status":"feedback","items":[{"kind":"verdict","verdict":"approve"}]}
ecc-plan-canvas end .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
# plan is confirmed — begin implementation
Revision loop — feedback arrives, you edit the file, reply, keep listening:
# await returned annotations → edit the .plan.md (canvas live-reloads)
ecc-plan-canvas await <file> --reply "Reworked the risk table."
# → blocks again until the next response
--timeout-ms in a loop. It exists for tests. Leave the plain
await running instead.await listening while the review is still open.
That is the one failure the human experiences as "I sent a message and
nothing happened".await.Design notes and origin: docs/design/plan-canvas.md.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。
从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。
用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。
设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。
根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。
在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。