跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

quarkus-verification

用于在Quarkus服务修改后或部署前,依次检查构建、代码分析、测试与漏洞,并验证原生可执行文件、容器及环境配置,梳理部署前的检查事项。

原文查看原文说明

Verification loop for Quarkus projects: build, static analysis (Checkstyle, PMD, SpotBugs), tests with JaCoCo coverage, OWASP dependency and container security scans, GraalVM native compilation, health checks, and config validation. Use when verifying a Quarkus service before a PR, after major refactoring or dependency upgrades, or pre-deploy.

AI 评分80分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 提交Quarkus拉取请求前检查
  • 验证重构或依赖更新
  • 检查原生可执行文件兼容性
  • 部署前检查容器与配置

中文介绍

功能

整理Quarkus服务修改后或部署前的验证流程,依次进行构建、无需运行代码的静态分析、测试和漏洞扫描,并使用JaCoCo检查测试覆盖了多少代码。还涵盖通过GraalVM生成原生可执行文件、负载测试、运行状态检查、容器检查,以及配置和文档审查。

适用场景

适合在提交拉取请求前、大规模重构后或依赖更新后使用,以减少遗漏检查。部署到预发布或生产环境之前,也可用于检查目标环境的配置和启动状态。材料包含验证脚本和GitHub Actions示例。

使用示例

  • “在提交拉取请求前验证这个Quarkus服务,并整理失败的检查项。”
  • “依赖更新后,检查测试覆盖率和漏洞。”
  • “确认原生可执行文件和容器能够启动。”

注意事项

需要准备Maven或Gradle,以及所选检查对应的工具。原生构建使用GraalVM或容器环境。SonarQube示例面向已完成配置的环境,并引用SONAR_TOKEN。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明拉取请求前、依赖更新后和部署前的用途,并列出十阶段验证。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好提供mvn jacoco:check等命令、覆盖率目标和报告路径。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
B部分不足包含发送SONAR_TOKEN和运行负载测试,但没有执行前的确认步骤。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足使用Maven、GraalVM、k6等工具,但未提供各工具的安装步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Quarkus Verification Loop

Run before PRs, after major changes, and pre-deploy.

When to Activate

  • Before opening a pull request for a Quarkus service
  • After major refactoring or dependency upgrades
  • Pre-deployment verification for staging or production
  • Running full build → lint → test → security scan → native compilation pipeline
  • Validating test coverage meets thresholds (80%+)
  • Testing native image compatibility

Phase 1: Build

# Maven
mvn clean verify -DskipTests

# Gradle
./gradlew clean assemble -x test

If build fails, stop and fix compilation errors.

Phase 2: Static Analysis

Checkstyle, PMD, SpotBugs (Maven)

mvn checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check

SonarQube (if configured)

mvn sonar:sonar \
  -Dsonar.projectKey=my-quarkus-project \
  -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 \
  -Dsonar.login=${SONAR_TOKEN}

Common Issues to Address

  • Unused imports or variables
  • Complex methods (high cyclomatic complexity)
  • Potential null pointer dereferences
  • Security issues flagged by SpotBugs

Phase 3: Tests + Coverage

# Run all tests
mvn clean test

# Generate coverage report
mvn jacoco:report

# Enforce coverage threshold (80%)
mvn jacoco:check

# Or with Gradle
./gradlew test jacocoTestReport jacocoTestCoverageVerification

Test Categories

Unit Tests

Test service logic with mocked dependencies:

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class UserServiceTest {
  @Mock UserRepository userRepository;
  @InjectMocks UserService userService;

  @Test
  void createUser_validInput_returnsUser() {
    var dto = new CreateUserDto("Alice", "alice@example.com");

    // Panache persist() is void — use doNothing + verify
    doNothing().when(userRepository).persist(any(User.class));

    User result = userService.create(dto);

    assertThat(result.name).isEqualTo("Alice");
    verify(userRepository).persist(any(User.class));
  }
}

Integration Tests

Test with real database (Testcontainers):

@QuarkusTest
@QuarkusTestResource(PostgresTestResource.class)
class UserRepositoryIntegrationTest {

  @Inject
  UserRepository userRepository;

  @Test
  @Transactional
  void findByEmail_existingUser_returnsUser() {
    User user = new User();
    user.name = "Alice";
    user.email = "alice@example.com";
    userRepository.persist(user);

    Optional<User> found = userRepository.findByEmail("alice@example.com");

    assertThat(found).isPresent();
    assertThat(found.get().name).isEqualTo("Alice");
  }
}

API Tests

Test REST endpoints with REST Assured:

@QuarkusTest
class UserResourceTest {

  @Test
  void createUser_validInput_returns201() {
    given()
        .contentType(ContentType.JSON)
        .body("""
            {"name": "Alice", "email": "alice@example.com"}
            """)
        .when().post("/api/users")
        .then()
        .statusCode(201)
        .body("name", equalTo("Alice"));
  }

  @Test
  void createUser_invalidEmail_returns400() {
    given()
        .contentType(ContentType.JSON)
        .body("""
            {"name": "Alice", "email": "invalid"}
            """)
        .when().post("/api/users")
        .then()
        .statusCode(400);
  }
}

Coverage Report

Check target/site/jacoco/index.html for detailed coverage:

  • Overall line coverage (target: 80%+)
  • Branch coverage (target: 70%+)
  • Identify uncovered critical paths

Phase 4: Security Scanning

Dependency Vulnerabilities (Maven)

mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check

Review target/dependency-check-report.html for CVEs.

Quarkus Security Audit

# Check vulnerable extensions
mvn quarkus:audit

# List all extensions
mvn quarkus:list-extensions

OWASP ZAP (API Security Testing)

docker run -t ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable zap-api-scan.py \
  -t http://localhost:8080/q/openapi \
  -f openapi

Common Security Checks

  • All secrets in environment variables (not in code)
  • Input validation on all endpoints
  • Authentication/authorization configured
  • CORS properly configured
  • Security headers set
  • Passwords hashed with BCrypt
  • SQL injection protection (parameterized queries)
  • Rate limiting on public endpoints

Phase 5: Native Compilation

Test GraalVM native image compatibility:

# Build native executable
mvn package -Dnative

# Or with container
mvn package -Dnative -Dquarkus.native.container-build=true

# Test native executable
./target/*-runner

# Run basic smoke tests
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/live
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/ready

Native Image Troubleshooting

Common issues:

  • Reflection: Add reflection config for dynamic classes
  • Resources: Include resources with quarkus.native.resources.includes
  • JNI: Register JNI classes if using native libraries

Example reflection config:

@RegisterForReflection(targets = {MyDynamicClass.class})
public class ReflectionConfiguration {}

Phase 6: Performance Testing

Load Testing with K6

// load-test.js
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check } from 'k6';

export const options = {
  stages: [
    { duration: '30s', target: 50 },
    { duration: '1m', target: 100 },
    { duration: '30s', target: 0 },
  ],
};

export default function () {
  const res = http.get('http://localhost:8080/api/markets');
  check(res, {
    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
    'response time < 200ms': (r) => r.timings.duration < 200,
  });
}

Run:

k6 run load-test.js

Metrics to Monitor

  • Response time (p50, p95, p99)
  • Throughput (requests/sec)
  • Error rate
  • Memory usage
  • CPU usage

Phase 7: Health Checks

# Liveness
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/live

# Readiness
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/ready

# All health checks
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health

# Metrics (if enabled)
curl http://localhost:8080/q/metrics

Expected responses:

{
  "status": "UP",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Database connection",
      "status": "UP"
    }
  ]
}

Phase 8: Container Image Build

# Build container image
mvn package -Dquarkus.container-image.build=true

# Or with specific registry
mvn package \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.build=true \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.registry=docker.io \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.group=myorg \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.tag=1.0.0

# Test container
docker run -p 8080:8080 myorg/my-quarkus-app:1.0.0

Container Security Scan

# Trivy
trivy image myorg/my-quarkus-app:1.0.0

# Grype
grype myorg/my-quarkus-app:1.0.0

Phase 9: Configuration Validation

# Check all configuration properties
mvn quarkus:info

# List all config sources
curl http://localhost:8080/q/dev/io.quarkus.quarkus-vertx-http/config

Environment-Specific Checks

  • Database URLs configured per environment
  • Secrets externalized (Vault, env vars)
  • Logging levels appropriate
  • CORS origins set correctly
  • Rate limiting configured
  • Monitoring/tracing enabled

Phase 10: Documentation Review

  • OpenAPI/Swagger docs up to date (/q/swagger-ui)
  • README has setup instructions
  • API changes documented
  • Migration guide for breaking changes
  • Configuration properties documented

Generate OpenAPI spec:

curl http://localhost:8080/q/openapi -o openapi.json

Verification Checklist

Code Quality

  • Build passes without warnings
  • Static analysis clean (no high/medium issues)
  • Code follows team conventions
  • No commented-out code or TODOs in PR

Testing

  • All tests pass
  • Code coverage ≥ 80%
  • Integration tests with real database
  • Security tests pass
  • Performance within acceptable limits

Security

  • No dependency vulnerabilities
  • Authentication/authorization tested
  • Input validation complete
  • Secrets not in source code
  • Security headers configured

Deployment

  • Native compilation successful
  • Container image builds
  • Health checks respond correctly
  • Configuration valid for target environment

Native Image

  • Native executable builds
  • Native tests pass
  • Startup time < 100ms
  • Memory footprint acceptable

Automated Verification Script

#!/bin/bash
set -e

echo "=== Phase 1: Build ==="
mvn clean verify -DskipTests

echo "=== Phase 2: Static Analysis ==="
mvn checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check

echo "=== Phase 3: Tests + Coverage ==="
mvn test jacoco:report jacoco:check

echo "=== Phase 4: Security Scan ==="
mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check

echo "=== Phase 5: Native Compilation ==="
mvn package -Dnative -Dquarkus.native.container-build=true

echo "=== All Phases Complete ==="
echo "Review reports:"
echo "  - Coverage: target/site/jacoco/index.html"
echo "  - Security: target/dependency-check-report.html"
echo "  - Native: target/*-runner"

CI/CD Integration

GitHub Actions Example

name: Verification

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  verify:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v7

      - name: Set up JDK 21
        uses: actions/setup-java@v5
        with:
          java-version: '21'
          distribution: 'temurin'

      - name: Cache Maven packages
        uses: actions/cache@v6
        with:
          path: ~/.m2
          key: ${{ runner.os }}-m2-${{ hashFiles('**/pom.xml') }}

      - name: Build
        run: mvn clean verify -DskipTests

      - name: Test with Coverage
        run: mvn test jacoco:report jacoco:check

      - name: Security Scan
        run: mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check

      - name: Upload Coverage
        uses: codecov/codecov-action@v7
        with:
          token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
          files: target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml

Best Practices

  • Run verification loop before every PR
  • Automate in CI/CD pipeline
  • Fix issues immediately; don't accumulate debt
  • Keep coverage above 80%
  • Update dependencies regularly
  • Test native compilation periodically
  • Monitor performance trends
  • Document breaking changes
  • Review security scan results
  • Validate configuration for each environment

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

accessibility

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。

  • 为纯图标按钮添加说明
  • 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
  • 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。

  • 排查仅在应用内出现的故障
  • 调查旧对话混入回答的原因
  • 核对工具漏执行或虚报执行
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-harness-construction

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。

  • 设计智能体工具及输入格式
  • 明确工具结果与下一步行动
  • 制定安全重试与停止条件
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。

  • 诊断代理连续失败
  • 调查重复调用工具的循环
  • 检查上下文积累导致的输出退化
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题