跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

redis-patterns

Build Redis caching, request limits, locks that coordinate multiple workers, and messaging. Use concrete implementation patterns to choose data structures, set key expiration, manage connections, and review common production pitfalls.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Redis data structure patterns, caching strategies, distributed locks, rate limiting, pub/sub, and connection management for production applications. Use when adding caching, a distributed lock, rate limiting, or pub/sub with Redis, or when key design needs review.

集成工具Redis
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Add response caching to an API
  • Limit API requests per user
  • Prevent workers from running the same job simultaneously
  • Choose between Pub/Sub and Streams for event delivery
  • Review key expiration and connection pool settings

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md11.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Redis Patterns

Quick reference for Redis best practices across common backend use cases.

How It Works

Redis is an in-memory data structure store that supports strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, streams, and more. Individual Redis commands are atomic on a single instance; multi-step workflows require Lua scripts, MULTI/EXEC transactions, or explicit synchronization to stay atomic. Data is optionally persisted via RDB snapshots or AOF logs. Clients communicate over TCP using the RESP protocol; connection pools are essential to avoid per-request handshake overhead.

When to Activate

  • Adding caching to an application
  • Implementing rate limiting or throttling
  • Building distributed locks or coordination
  • Setting up session or token storage
  • Using Pub/Sub or Redis Streams for messaging
  • Configuring Redis in production (pooling, eviction, clustering)

Data Structure Cheat Sheet

Use CaseStructureExample Key
Simple cacheStringproduct:123
User sessionHashsession:abc
LeaderboardSorted Setscores:weekly
Unique visitorsSetvisitors:2024-01-01
Activity feedListfeed:user:456
Event streamStreamevents:orders
Counters / rate limitsString (INCR)ratelimit:user:123
Bloom filter / HLLHyperLogLoghll:pageviews

Core Patterns

Cache-Aside (Lazy Loading)

import redis
import json

r = redis.Redis(host='localhost', port=6379, decode_responses=True)

def get_product(product_id: int):
    cache_key = f"product:{product_id}"
    cached = r.get(cache_key)

    if cached:
        return json.loads(cached)

    product = db.query("SELECT * FROM products WHERE id = %s", product_id)
    r.setex(cache_key, 3600, json.dumps(product))  # TTL: 1 hour
    return product

Write-Through Cache

def update_product(product_id: int, data: dict):
    # Write to DB first
    db.execute("UPDATE products SET ... WHERE id = %s", product_id)

    # Immediately update cache
    cache_key = f"product:{product_id}"
    r.setex(cache_key, 3600, json.dumps(data))

Cache Invalidation

# Tag-based invalidation — group related keys under a set
def cache_product(product_id: int, category_id: int, data: dict):
    key = f"product:{product_id}"
    tag = f"tag:category:{category_id}"
    pipe = r.pipeline(transaction=True)
    pipe.setex(key, 3600, json.dumps(data))
    pipe.sadd(tag, key)
    pipe.expire(tag, 3600)
    pipe.execute()

def invalidate_category(category_id: int):
    tag = f"tag:category:{category_id}"
    keys = r.smembers(tag)
    if keys:
        r.delete(*keys)
    r.delete(tag)

Session Storage

import time
import uuid

def create_session(user_id: int, ttl: int = 86400) -> str:
    session_id = str(uuid.uuid4())
    key = f"session:{session_id}"
    pipe = r.pipeline(transaction=True)
    pipe.hset(key, mapping={
        "user_id": user_id,
        "created_at": int(time.time()),
    })
    pipe.expire(key, ttl)
    pipe.execute()
    return session_id

def get_session(session_id: str) -> dict | None:
    data = r.hgetall(f"session:{session_id}")
    return data if data else None

def delete_session(session_id: str):
    r.delete(f"session:{session_id}")

Rate Limiting

Fixed Window (Simple)

def is_rate_limited(user_id: int, limit: int = 100, window: int = 60) -> bool:
    key = f"ratelimit:{user_id}:{int(time.time()) // window}"
    pipe = r.pipeline(transaction=True)
    pipe.incr(key)
    pipe.expire(key, window)
    count, _ = pipe.execute()
    return count > limit

Sliding Window (Lua — Atomic)

-- sliding_window.lua
local key = KEYS[1]
local now = tonumber(ARGV[1])
local window = tonumber(ARGV[2])
local limit = tonumber(ARGV[3])

redis.call('ZREMRANGEBYSCORE', key, 0, now - window)
local count = redis.call('ZCARD', key)

if count < limit then
    -- Use unique member (now + sequence) to avoid collisions within the same millisecond
    local seq_key = key .. ':seq'
    local seq = redis.call('INCR', seq_key)
    redis.call('EXPIRE', seq_key, math.ceil(window / 1000))
    redis.call('ZADD', key, now, now .. '-' .. seq)
    redis.call('EXPIRE', key, math.ceil(window / 1000))
    return 1
end
return 0
sliding_window = r.register_script(open('sliding_window.lua').read())

def allow_request(user_id: int) -> bool:
    key = f"ratelimit:sliding:{user_id}"
    now = int(time.time() * 1000)
    return bool(sliding_window(keys=[key], args=[now, 60000, 100]))

Distributed Locks

Distributed Lock (Single Node — SET NX PX)

import uuid

def acquire_lock(resource: str, ttl_ms: int = 5000) -> str | None:
    lock_key = f"lock:{resource}"
    token = str(uuid.uuid4())
    acquired = r.set(lock_key, token, px=ttl_ms, nx=True)
    return token if acquired else None

def release_lock(resource: str, token: str) -> bool:
    release_script = """
    if redis.call('get', KEYS[1]) == ARGV[1] then
        return redis.call('del', KEYS[1])
    else
        return 0
    end
    """
    result = r.eval(release_script, 1, f"lock:{resource}", token)
    return bool(result)

# Usage
token = acquire_lock("order:payment:123")
if token:
    try:
        process_payment()
    finally:
        release_lock("order:payment:123", token)

For multi-node setups use the redlock-py library which implements the full Redlock algorithm.

Pub/Sub & Streams

Pub/Sub (Fire-and-Forget)

# Publisher
def publish_event(channel: str, payload: dict):
    r.publish(channel, json.dumps(payload))

# Subscriber (blocking — run in separate thread/process)
def subscribe_events(channel: str):
    pubsub = r.pubsub()
    pubsub.subscribe(channel)
    for message in pubsub.listen():
        if message['type'] == 'message':
            handle(json.loads(message['data']))

Redis Streams (Durable Queue)

# Producer
def emit(stream: str, event: dict):
    r.xadd(stream, event, maxlen=10000)  # Cap stream length

# Consumer group — guarantees at-least-once delivery
try:
    r.xgroup_create('events:orders', 'processor', id='0', mkstream=True)
except Exception:
    pass  # Group already exists

def consume(stream: str, group: str, consumer: str):
    while True:
        messages = r.xreadgroup(group, consumer, {stream: '>'}, count=10, block=2000)
        for _, entries in (messages or []):
            for msg_id, data in entries:
                process(data)
                r.xack(stream, group, msg_id)

Prefer Streams over Pub/Sub when you need delivery guarantees, consumer groups, or replay.

Key Design

Naming Conventions

# Pattern: resource:id:field
user:123:profile
order:456:status
cache:product:789

# Pattern: namespace:resource:id
myapp:session:abc123
myapp:ratelimit:user:123

# Pattern: resource:date (time-bound keys)
stats:pageviews:2024-01-01

TTL Strategy

Data TypeSuggested TTL
User session24h (86400)
API response cache5–15 min
Rate limit windowMatch window size
Short-lived tokens5–10 min
Leaderboard1h–24h
Static/reference data1h–1 week

Always set a TTL. Keys without TTL accumulate indefinitely and cause memory pressure.

Connection Management

Connection Pooling

from redis import ConnectionPool, Redis

pool = ConnectionPool(
    host='localhost',
    port=6379,
    db=0,
    max_connections=20,
    decode_responses=True,
    socket_connect_timeout=2,
    socket_timeout=2,
)

r = Redis(connection_pool=pool)

Cluster Mode

from redis.cluster import RedisCluster

r = RedisCluster(
    startup_nodes=[{"host": "redis-1", "port": 6379}],
    decode_responses=True,
    skip_full_coverage_check=True,
)

Sentinel (High Availability)

from redis.sentinel import Sentinel

sentinel = Sentinel(
    [('sentinel-1', 26379), ('sentinel-2', 26379)],
    socket_timeout=0.5,
)
master = sentinel.master_for('mymaster', decode_responses=True)
replica = sentinel.slave_for('mymaster', decode_responses=True)

Eviction Policies

PolicyBehaviorBest For
noevictionError on write when fullQueues / critical data
allkeys-lruEvict least recently usedGeneral cache
volatile-lruLRU only among keys with TTLMixed data store
allkeys-lfuEvict least frequently usedSkewed access patterns
volatile-ttlEvict soonest-to-expirePrioritize long-lived data

Set via redis.conf: maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternProblemFix
Keys with no TTLMemory grows unboundedAlways set TTL
KEYS * in productionBlocks the server (O(N))Use SCAN cursor
Storing large blobs (>100KB)Slow serialization, memory pressureStore reference + fetch from object store
Single Redis for everythingNo isolation between cache & queueUse separate DBs or instances
Ignoring connection pool limitsConnection exhaustion under loadSize pool to workload
Not handling cache miss stampedeThundering herd on cold startUse locks or probabilistic early expiry
FLUSHALL without thoughtWipes entire instanceScope deletes by key pattern

Cache Miss Stampede Prevention

import threading

_locks: dict[str, threading.Lock] = {}
_locks_mutex = threading.Lock()

def get_with_lock(key: str, fetch_fn, ttl: int = 300):
    cached = r.get(key)
    if cached:
        return json.loads(cached)

    with _locks_mutex:
        if key not in _locks:
            _locks[key] = threading.Lock()
        lock = _locks[key]
    with lock:
        cached = r.get(key)  # Re-check after acquiring lock
        if cached:
            return json.loads(cached)
        value = fetch_fn()
        r.setex(key, ttl, json.dumps(value))
        return value

Note: for multi-process deployments, replace the in-process lock with acquire_lock/release_lock from the Distributed Locks section above.

Examples

Add caching to a Django/Flask API endpoint: Use cache-aside with setex and a 5-minute TTL on the response. Key on the request parameters.

Rate-limit an API by user: Use fixed-window with pipeline(transaction=True) for low-traffic endpoints; use sliding-window Lua for accurate per-user throttling.

Coordinate a background job across workers: Use acquire_lock with a TTL that exceeds the expected job duration. Always release in a finally block.

Fan-out notifications to multiple subscribers: Use Pub/Sub for fire-and-forget. Switch to Streams if you need guaranteed delivery or replay for late consumers.

Quick Reference

PatternWhen to Use
Cache-asideRead-heavy, tolerate slight staleness
Write-throughStrong consistency required
Distributed lockPrevent concurrent access to a resource
Sliding window rate limitAccurate per-user throttling
Redis StreamsDurable event queue with consumer groups
Pub/SubBroadcast with no delivery guarantees needed
Sorted Set leaderboardRanked scoring, pagination
HyperLogLogApproximate unique count at low memory

Related

  • Skill: postgres-patterns — relational data patterns
  • Skill: backend-patterns — API and service layer patterns
  • Skill: database-migrations — schema versioning
  • Skill: django-patterns — Django cache framework integration
  • Agent: database-reviewer — full database review workflow

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题