跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

scientific-db-uspto-database

Research United States patents and trademarks using official USPTO records. Find patents, check application and trademark status, review examination documents and ownership transfer records, and keep search logs so findings can be checked and reproduced.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

USPTO patent and trademark data workflow for official record lookup, PatentSearch queries, TSDR checks, assignment data, and reproducible IP research logs. Use when a task needs official United States patent or trademark records from USPTO systems.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Search patents by company, inventor, date, or classification
  • Check patent application status and examination records
  • Retrieve trademark status and documents
  • Review assignment records and preserve research logs

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

USPTO Database

Use this skill when a task needs official United States patent or trademark records from USPTO systems.

When to Use

  • Searching granted patents or pre-grant publications.
  • Checking patent application status, file-wrapper data, assignments, or public prosecution history.
  • Looking up trademark status, documents, or assignment history.
  • Building reproducible prior-art, portfolio, or IP landscape research logs.
  • Comparing USPTO records with secondary tools such as Google Patents, Lens.org, Semantic Scholar, or company patent pages.

Do not use this skill to give legal advice. Treat it as a data-gathering and record-verification workflow.

Source Selection

Prefer official USPTO or USPTO-supported surfaces first:

  • Open Data Portal (ODP): current home for migrated USPTO datasets and APIs.
  • Patent File Wrapper: public patent application bibliographic data and file wrapper records.
  • PatentSearch API: PatentsView search API for granted patents and pre-grant publication datasets.
  • TSDR Data API: trademark status and document retrieval.
  • Patent and Trademark Assignment Search: ownership transfer records.
  • PTAB data in ODP: Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings.

Use secondary sources only as convenience indexes. When the answer matters, cross-check the official record.

Authentication and Secrets

Many USPTO API flows require an API key. Store keys in environment variables or a secret manager, never in committed files or pasted transcripts.

Common environment names:

export USPTO_API_KEY="..."
export PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY="..."

For PatentSearch, send the key with the X-Api-Key header. For TSDR, follow the current USPTO API Manager instructions and rate-limit guidance.

PatentSearch Workflow

Use PatentSearch for broad patent and pre-grant publication search when the question is about trends, inventors, assignees, classifications, dates, or portfolio slices.

Workflow:

  1. Identify the endpoint from the current PatentSearch reference or Swagger UI.
  2. Build a JSON query with explicit filters.
  3. Request only the fields needed for the analysis.
  4. Sort and paginate deterministically.
  5. Record the endpoint, query body, date, data currency note, and result count.

Python request skeleton:

import os
import requests

API_KEY = os.environ["PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY"]
BASE = "https://search.patentsview.org/api/v1"

payload = {
    "q": {
        "_and": [
            {"patent_date": {"_gte": "2024-01-01"}},
            {"assignees.assignee_organization": {"_text_any": ["Google", "Alphabet"]}},
        ]
    },
    "f": ["patent_id", "patent_title", "patent_date"],
    "s": [{"patent_date": "desc"}],
    "o": {"per_page": 100, "page": 1},
}

response = requests.post(
    f"{BASE}/patent/",
    headers={"X-Api-Key": API_KEY, "Content-Type": "application/json"},
    json=payload,
    timeout=30,
)
response.raise_for_status()
print(response.json())

Before reusing a query, verify current endpoint names, field paths, request parameters, and API-key availability in the live PatentSearch docs.

Trademark/TSDR Workflow

Use TSDR when the task needs trademark case status, documents, images, owner history, or prosecution events.

Workflow:

  1. Normalize the serial number or registration number.
  2. Check the current TSDR API instructions and required API-key header.
  3. Fetch status first, then documents only if needed.
  4. Respect the lower rate limit for PDF, ZIP, and multi-case downloads.
  5. Capture retrieval date and serial/registration identifier in the output.

For large trademark pulls, prefer documented bulk-data flows rather than screen-scraping public pages.

File Wrapper and Prosecution History

For application status, transaction history, and prosecution documents:

  • Start with ODP Patent File Wrapper search.
  • Use exact identifiers when available: application number, publication number, patent number, or party name.
  • Record whether the record is a granted patent, pre-grant publication, or pending application.
  • Cross-check document dates and status against the record detail page before citing them.

Assignment Workflow

For patent or trademark ownership:

  1. Search official assignment data by patent/application/registration number, assignor, assignee, or reel/frame when available.
  2. Record conveyance text, execution date, recordation date, and parties.
  3. Distinguish assignment records from current legal ownership conclusions.
  4. If ownership is material, flag the result for attorney or subject-matter review.

Reproducible Output

Every USPTO research pass should include a log table:

| Source | Date searched | Identifier/query | Filters | Results | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | --- |
| PatentSearch | 2026-05-11 | `assignee=Alphabet AND date>=2024` | patent endpoint | 118 | API docs checked before run |
| TSDR | 2026-05-11 | `serial=90000000` | status only | 1 | API-key flow, no document bulk pull |

For final writeups, separate:

  • official record facts
  • inferred analysis
  • secondary-source convenience matches
  • unresolved gaps or records that require legal review

Review Checklist

  • Did you use an official USPTO or USPTO-supported source first?
  • Did you verify current endpoint and field names before running code?
  • Are API keys kept out of files, shell history, and output logs?
  • Does the query log include the date searched and exact request shape?
  • Are rate limits respected?
  • Are legal conclusions avoided or explicitly escalated?
  • Are secondary sources labeled as secondary?

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题