跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

security-review

为认证、支付和API的实现与审查提供安全检查项、实现示例及上线前清单,涵盖输入验证、访问权限、秘密信息管理、请求限流,以及日志和错误中的敏感信息泄露。

原文查看原文说明

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 检查登录和访问权限
  • 审查API输入与文件上传
  • 检查秘密信息和敏感日志
  • 在生产发布前检查安全性

中文介绍

功能

security-review提供安全检查项和实现示例,用于从安全角度实现与审查认证、支付、API等代码。内容包括输入值与上传文件的验证、访问权限检查、秘密信息管理,以及防止SQL注入和向页面插入恶意脚本的方法。请求限流、日志或错误信息中的敏感信息泄露,以及依赖包漏洞也在检查范围内。

适用场景

适合新增登录功能、接入外部API,或审查处理个人信息和支付信息的代码。需要整理生产发布前的检查清单时也可使用。资料还提供认证被拒绝、权限不足、输入无效和请求限流的测试示例,可用于确认这些情况下的行为。

使用示例

  • “审查这个API的输入验证和权限检查。”
  • “按照上线前检查清单,检查秘密信息与日志的处理方式。”

注意事项

实现示例使用zod、isomorphic-dompurify、express-rate-limit等库。资料还包含针对Supabase和Solana的检查项,应根据项目所用技术选择适用内容。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确列出认证、输入、秘密信息和支付等使用场景及审查范围。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好输入验证、权限检查等章节均提供实现代码和验证清单。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好代码示例明确展示用环境变量管理秘密信息、删除前检查权限及验证输入。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足示例列出zod等库,但未提供这些库及引用模块的配置步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md12.7 KB
  • cloud-infrastructure-security.md9.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Security Review Skill

This skill ensures all code follows security best practices and identifies potential vulnerabilities.

When to Activate

  • Implementing authentication or authorization
  • Handling user input or file uploads
  • Creating new API endpoints
  • Working with secrets or credentials
  • Implementing payment features
  • Storing or transmitting sensitive data
  • Integrating third-party APIs

Security Checklist

1. Secrets Management

FAIL: NEVER Do This

const apiKey = "sk-proj-xxxxx"  // Hardcoded secret
const dbPassword = "password123" // In source code

PASS: ALWAYS Do This

const apiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY
const dbUrl = process.env.DATABASE_URL

// Verify secrets exist
if (!apiKey) {
  throw new Error('OPENAI_API_KEY not configured')
}

Verification Steps

  • No hardcoded API keys, tokens, or passwords
  • All secrets in environment variables
  • .env.local in .gitignore
  • No secrets in git history
  • Production secrets in hosting platform (Vercel, Railway)

2. Input Validation

Always Validate User Input

import { z } from 'zod'

// Define validation schema
const CreateUserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
  age: z.number().int().min(0).max(150)
})

// Validate before processing
export async function createUser(input: unknown) {
  try {
    const validated = CreateUserSchema.parse(input)
    return await db.users.create(validated)
  } catch (error) {
    if (error instanceof z.ZodError) {
      return { success: false, errors: error.issues }
    }
    throw error
  }
}

File Upload Validation

function validateFileUpload(file: File) {
  // Size check (5MB max)
  const maxSize = 5 * 1024 * 1024
  if (file.size > maxSize) {
    throw new Error('File too large (max 5MB)')
  }

  // Type check
  const allowedTypes = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/gif']
  if (!allowedTypes.includes(file.type)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid file type')
  }

  // Extension check
  const allowedExtensions = ['.jpg', '.jpeg', '.png', '.gif']
  const extension = file.name.toLowerCase().match(/\.[^.]+$/)?.[0]
  if (!extension || !allowedExtensions.includes(extension)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid file extension')
  }

  return true
}

Verification Steps

  • All user inputs validated with schemas
  • File uploads restricted (size, type, extension)
  • No direct use of user input in queries
  • Whitelist validation (not blacklist)
  • Error messages don't leak sensitive info

3. SQL Injection Prevention

FAIL: NEVER Concatenate SQL

// DANGEROUS - SQL Injection vulnerability
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${userEmail}'`
await db.query(query)

PASS: ALWAYS Use Parameterized Queries

// Safe - parameterized query
const { data } = await supabase
  .from('users')
  .select('*')
  .eq('email', userEmail)

// Or with raw SQL -- the value goes in the params array, never in the
// string. Use your driver's placeholder syntax (Postgres numbers its
// placeholders, MySQL uses "?").
await db.query(
  'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?',
  [userEmail]
)
<!-- Do not write a literal dollar-sign-N placeholder anywhere in this file. Invoking this skill with arguments substitutes it away, and the example above then renders as concatenated SQL -- the exact anti-pattern this section warns against. Use "?" and name the Postgres form in prose. -->

Verification Steps

  • All database queries use parameterized queries
  • No string concatenation in SQL
  • ORM/query builder used correctly
  • Supabase queries properly sanitized

4. Authentication & Authorization

JWT Token Handling

// FAIL: WRONG: localStorage (vulnerable to XSS)
localStorage.setItem('token', token)

// PASS: CORRECT: httpOnly cookies
res.setHeader('Set-Cookie',
  `token=${token}; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict; Max-Age=3600`)

Authorization Checks

export async function deleteUser(userId: string, requesterId: string) {
  // ALWAYS verify authorization first
  const requester = await db.users.findUnique({
    where: { id: requesterId }
  })

  if (requester.role !== 'admin') {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'Unauthorized' },
      { status: 403 }
    )
  }

  // Proceed with deletion
  await db.users.delete({ where: { id: userId } })
}

Row Level Security (Supabase)

-- Enable RLS on all tables
ALTER TABLE users ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

-- Users can only view their own data
CREATE POLICY "Users view own data"
  ON users FOR SELECT
  USING (auth.uid() = id);

-- Users can only update their own data
CREATE POLICY "Users update own data"
  ON users FOR UPDATE
  USING (auth.uid() = id);

Verification Steps

  • Tokens stored in httpOnly cookies (not localStorage)
  • Authorization checks before sensitive operations
  • Row Level Security enabled in Supabase
  • Role-based access control implemented
  • Session management secure

5. XSS Prevention

Sanitize HTML

import DOMPurify from 'isomorphic-dompurify'

// ALWAYS sanitize user-provided HTML
function renderUserContent(html: string) {
  const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(html, {
    ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'p'],
    ALLOWED_ATTR: []
  })
  return <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: clean }} />
}

Content Security Policy

Start strict and loosen only with a documented removal plan. Do not default to 'unsafe-inline' or 'unsafe-eval'; they neutralize much of CSP's protection and should be treated as temporary compatibility debt.

// next.config.js
const securityHeaders = [
  {
    key: 'Content-Security-Policy',
    value: `
      default-src 'self';
      base-uri 'self';
      object-src 'none';
      frame-ancestors 'none';
      script-src 'self';
      style-src 'self';
      img-src 'self' data: https:;
      font-src 'self';
      connect-src 'self' https://api.example.com;
    `.replace(/\s{2,}/g, ' ').trim()
  }
]

Verification Steps

  • User-provided HTML sanitized
  • CSP headers configured
  • No unvalidated dynamic content rendering
  • React's built-in XSS protection used

6. CSRF Protection

CSRF Tokens

import { csrf } from '@/lib/csrf'

export async function POST(request: Request) {
  const token = request.headers.get('X-CSRF-Token')

  if (!csrf.verify(token)) {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'Invalid CSRF token' },
      { status: 403 }
    )
  }

  // Process request
}

SameSite Cookies

res.setHeader('Set-Cookie',
  `session=${sessionId}; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict`)

Verification Steps

  • CSRF tokens on state-changing operations
  • SameSite=Strict on all cookies
  • Double-submit cookie pattern implemented

7. Rate Limiting

API Rate Limiting

import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit'

const limiter = rateLimit({
  windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
  max: 100, // 100 requests per window
  message: 'Too many requests'
})

// Apply to routes
app.use('/api/', limiter)

Expensive Operations

// Aggressive rate limiting for searches
const searchLimiter = rateLimit({
  windowMs: 60 * 1000, // 1 minute
  max: 10, // 10 requests per minute
  message: 'Too many search requests'
})

app.use('/api/search', searchLimiter)

Verification Steps

  • Rate limiting on all API endpoints
  • Stricter limits on expensive operations
  • IP-based rate limiting
  • User-based rate limiting (authenticated)

8. Sensitive Data Exposure

Logging

// FAIL: WRONG: Logging sensitive data
console.log('User login:', { email, password })
console.log('Payment:', { cardNumber, cvv })

// PASS: CORRECT: Redact sensitive data
console.log('User login:', { email, userId })
console.log('Payment:', { last4: card.last4, userId })

Error Messages

// FAIL: WRONG: Exposing internal details
catch (error) {
  return NextResponse.json(
    { error: error.message, stack: error.stack },
    { status: 500 }
  )
}

// PASS: CORRECT: Generic error messages
catch (error) {
  console.error('Internal error:', error)
  return NextResponse.json(
    { error: 'An error occurred. Please try again.' },
    { status: 500 }
  )
}

Verification Steps

  • No passwords, tokens, or secrets in logs
  • Error messages generic for users
  • Detailed errors only in server logs
  • No stack traces exposed to users

9. Blockchain Security (Solana)

Wallet Verification

import { verify } from '@solana/web3.js'

async function verifyWalletOwnership(
  publicKey: string,
  signature: string,
  message: string
) {
  try {
    const isValid = verify(
      Buffer.from(message),
      Buffer.from(signature, 'base64'),
      Buffer.from(publicKey, 'base64')
    )
    return isValid
  } catch (error) {
    return false
  }
}

Transaction Verification

async function verifyTransaction(transaction: Transaction) {
  // Verify recipient
  if (transaction.to !== expectedRecipient) {
    throw new Error('Invalid recipient')
  }

  // Verify amount
  if (transaction.amount > maxAmount) {
    throw new Error('Amount exceeds limit')
  }

  // Verify user has sufficient balance
  const balance = await getBalance(transaction.from)
  if (balance < transaction.amount) {
    throw new Error('Insufficient balance')
  }

  return true
}

Verification Steps

  • Wallet signatures verified
  • Transaction details validated
  • Balance checks before transactions
  • No blind transaction signing

10. Dependency Security

Regular Updates

# Check for vulnerabilities
npm audit

# Fix automatically fixable issues
npm audit fix

# Update dependencies
npm update

# Check for outdated packages
npm outdated

Lock Files

# ALWAYS commit lock files
git add package-lock.json

# Use in CI/CD for reproducible builds
npm ci  # Instead of npm install

Verification Steps

  • Dependencies up to date
  • No known vulnerabilities (npm audit clean)
  • Lock files committed
  • Dependabot enabled on GitHub
  • Regular security updates

Security Testing

Automated Security Tests

// Test authentication
test('requires authentication', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/protected')
  expect(response.status).toBe(401)
})

// Test authorization
test('requires admin role', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/admin', {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
  })
  expect(response.status).toBe(403)
})

// Test input validation
test('rejects invalid input', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/users', {
    method: 'POST',
    body: JSON.stringify({ email: 'not-an-email' })
  })
  expect(response.status).toBe(400)
})

// Test rate limiting
test('enforces rate limits', async () => {
  const requests = Array(101).fill(null).map(() =>
    fetch('/api/endpoint')
  )

  const responses = await Promise.all(requests)
  const tooManyRequests = responses.filter(r => r.status === 429)

  expect(tooManyRequests.length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
})

Pre-Deployment Security Checklist

Before ANY production deployment:

  • Secrets: No hardcoded secrets, all in env vars
  • Input Validation: All user inputs validated
  • SQL Injection: All queries parameterized
  • XSS: User content sanitized
  • CSRF: Protection enabled
  • Authentication: Proper token handling
  • Authorization: Role checks in place
  • Rate Limiting: Enabled on all endpoints
  • HTTPS: Enforced in production
  • Security Headers: CSP, X-Frame-Options configured
  • Error Handling: No sensitive data in errors
  • Logging: No sensitive data logged
  • Dependencies: Up to date, no vulnerabilities
  • Row Level Security: Enabled in Supabase
  • CORS: Properly configured
  • File Uploads: Validated (size, type)
  • Wallet Signatures: Verified (if blockchain)

Resources


Remember: Security is not optional. One vulnerability can compromise the entire platform. When in doubt, err on the side of caution.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

accessibility

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。

  • 为纯图标按钮添加说明
  • 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
  • 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。

  • 排查仅在应用内出现的故障
  • 调查旧对话混入回答的原因
  • 核对工具漏执行或虚报执行
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-harness-construction

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。

  • 设计智能体工具及输入格式
  • 明确工具结果与下一步行动
  • 制定安全重试与停止条件
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。

  • 诊断代理连续失败
  • 调查重复调用工具的循环
  • 检查上下文积累导致的输出退化
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月5日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题