跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

security-review

Review authentication, payments, and APIs for security risks using implementation examples and a predeployment checklist. Covers input validation, access permissions, secret storage, request limits, and checks for sensitive information in logs and errors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Reviewing login and access permissions
  • Checking API input and file uploads
  • Reviewing secrets and sensitive logs
  • Checking security before deployment

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md12.7 KB
  • cloud-infrastructure-security.md9.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Security Review Skill

This skill ensures all code follows security best practices and identifies potential vulnerabilities.

When to Activate

  • Implementing authentication or authorization
  • Handling user input or file uploads
  • Creating new API endpoints
  • Working with secrets or credentials
  • Implementing payment features
  • Storing or transmitting sensitive data
  • Integrating third-party APIs

Security Checklist

1. Secrets Management

FAIL: NEVER Do This

const apiKey = "sk-proj-xxxxx"  // Hardcoded secret
const dbPassword = "password123" // In source code

PASS: ALWAYS Do This

const apiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY
const dbUrl = process.env.DATABASE_URL

// Verify secrets exist
if (!apiKey) {
  throw new Error('OPENAI_API_KEY not configured')
}

Verification Steps

  • No hardcoded API keys, tokens, or passwords
  • All secrets in environment variables
  • .env.local in .gitignore
  • No secrets in git history
  • Production secrets in hosting platform (Vercel, Railway)

2. Input Validation

Always Validate User Input

import { z } from 'zod'

// Define validation schema
const CreateUserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
  age: z.number().int().min(0).max(150)
})

// Validate before processing
export async function createUser(input: unknown) {
  try {
    const validated = CreateUserSchema.parse(input)
    return await db.users.create(validated)
  } catch (error) {
    if (error instanceof z.ZodError) {
      return { success: false, errors: error.issues }
    }
    throw error
  }
}

File Upload Validation

function validateFileUpload(file: File) {
  // Size check (5MB max)
  const maxSize = 5 * 1024 * 1024
  if (file.size > maxSize) {
    throw new Error('File too large (max 5MB)')
  }

  // Type check
  const allowedTypes = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/gif']
  if (!allowedTypes.includes(file.type)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid file type')
  }

  // Extension check
  const allowedExtensions = ['.jpg', '.jpeg', '.png', '.gif']
  const extension = file.name.toLowerCase().match(/\.[^.]+$/)?.[0]
  if (!extension || !allowedExtensions.includes(extension)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid file extension')
  }

  return true
}

Verification Steps

  • All user inputs validated with schemas
  • File uploads restricted (size, type, extension)
  • No direct use of user input in queries
  • Whitelist validation (not blacklist)
  • Error messages don't leak sensitive info

3. SQL Injection Prevention

FAIL: NEVER Concatenate SQL

// DANGEROUS - SQL Injection vulnerability
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${userEmail}'`
await db.query(query)

PASS: ALWAYS Use Parameterized Queries

// Safe - parameterized query
const { data } = await supabase
  .from('users')
  .select('*')
  .eq('email', userEmail)

// Or with raw SQL -- the value goes in the params array, never in the
// string. Use your driver's placeholder syntax (Postgres numbers its
// placeholders, MySQL uses "?").
await db.query(
  'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?',
  [userEmail]
)
<!-- Do not write a literal dollar-sign-N placeholder anywhere in this file. Invoking this skill with arguments substitutes it away, and the example above then renders as concatenated SQL -- the exact anti-pattern this section warns against. Use "?" and name the Postgres form in prose. -->

Verification Steps

  • All database queries use parameterized queries
  • No string concatenation in SQL
  • ORM/query builder used correctly
  • Supabase queries properly sanitized

4. Authentication & Authorization

JWT Token Handling

// FAIL: WRONG: localStorage (vulnerable to XSS)
localStorage.setItem('token', token)

// PASS: CORRECT: httpOnly cookies
res.setHeader('Set-Cookie',
  `token=${token}; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict; Max-Age=3600`)

Authorization Checks

export async function deleteUser(userId: string, requesterId: string) {
  // ALWAYS verify authorization first
  const requester = await db.users.findUnique({
    where: { id: requesterId }
  })

  if (requester.role !== 'admin') {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'Unauthorized' },
      { status: 403 }
    )
  }

  // Proceed with deletion
  await db.users.delete({ where: { id: userId } })
}

Row Level Security (Supabase)

-- Enable RLS on all tables
ALTER TABLE users ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

-- Users can only view their own data
CREATE POLICY "Users view own data"
  ON users FOR SELECT
  USING (auth.uid() = id);

-- Users can only update their own data
CREATE POLICY "Users update own data"
  ON users FOR UPDATE
  USING (auth.uid() = id);

Verification Steps

  • Tokens stored in httpOnly cookies (not localStorage)
  • Authorization checks before sensitive operations
  • Row Level Security enabled in Supabase
  • Role-based access control implemented
  • Session management secure

5. XSS Prevention

Sanitize HTML

import DOMPurify from 'isomorphic-dompurify'

// ALWAYS sanitize user-provided HTML
function renderUserContent(html: string) {
  const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(html, {
    ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'p'],
    ALLOWED_ATTR: []
  })
  return <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: clean }} />
}

Content Security Policy

Start strict and loosen only with a documented removal plan. Do not default to 'unsafe-inline' or 'unsafe-eval'; they neutralize much of CSP's protection and should be treated as temporary compatibility debt.

// next.config.js
const securityHeaders = [
  {
    key: 'Content-Security-Policy',
    value: `
      default-src 'self';
      base-uri 'self';
      object-src 'none';
      frame-ancestors 'none';
      script-src 'self';
      style-src 'self';
      img-src 'self' data: https:;
      font-src 'self';
      connect-src 'self' https://api.example.com;
    `.replace(/\s{2,}/g, ' ').trim()
  }
]

Verification Steps

  • User-provided HTML sanitized
  • CSP headers configured
  • No unvalidated dynamic content rendering
  • React's built-in XSS protection used

6. CSRF Protection

CSRF Tokens

import { csrf } from '@/lib/csrf'

export async function POST(request: Request) {
  const token = request.headers.get('X-CSRF-Token')

  if (!csrf.verify(token)) {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'Invalid CSRF token' },
      { status: 403 }
    )
  }

  // Process request
}

SameSite Cookies

res.setHeader('Set-Cookie',
  `session=${sessionId}; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict`)

Verification Steps

  • CSRF tokens on state-changing operations
  • SameSite=Strict on all cookies
  • Double-submit cookie pattern implemented

7. Rate Limiting

API Rate Limiting

import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit'

const limiter = rateLimit({
  windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
  max: 100, // 100 requests per window
  message: 'Too many requests'
})

// Apply to routes
app.use('/api/', limiter)

Expensive Operations

// Aggressive rate limiting for searches
const searchLimiter = rateLimit({
  windowMs: 60 * 1000, // 1 minute
  max: 10, // 10 requests per minute
  message: 'Too many search requests'
})

app.use('/api/search', searchLimiter)

Verification Steps

  • Rate limiting on all API endpoints
  • Stricter limits on expensive operations
  • IP-based rate limiting
  • User-based rate limiting (authenticated)

8. Sensitive Data Exposure

Logging

// FAIL: WRONG: Logging sensitive data
console.log('User login:', { email, password })
console.log('Payment:', { cardNumber, cvv })

// PASS: CORRECT: Redact sensitive data
console.log('User login:', { email, userId })
console.log('Payment:', { last4: card.last4, userId })

Error Messages

// FAIL: WRONG: Exposing internal details
catch (error) {
  return NextResponse.json(
    { error: error.message, stack: error.stack },
    { status: 500 }
  )
}

// PASS: CORRECT: Generic error messages
catch (error) {
  console.error('Internal error:', error)
  return NextResponse.json(
    { error: 'An error occurred. Please try again.' },
    { status: 500 }
  )
}

Verification Steps

  • No passwords, tokens, or secrets in logs
  • Error messages generic for users
  • Detailed errors only in server logs
  • No stack traces exposed to users

9. Blockchain Security (Solana)

Wallet Verification

import { verify } from '@solana/web3.js'

async function verifyWalletOwnership(
  publicKey: string,
  signature: string,
  message: string
) {
  try {
    const isValid = verify(
      Buffer.from(message),
      Buffer.from(signature, 'base64'),
      Buffer.from(publicKey, 'base64')
    )
    return isValid
  } catch (error) {
    return false
  }
}

Transaction Verification

async function verifyTransaction(transaction: Transaction) {
  // Verify recipient
  if (transaction.to !== expectedRecipient) {
    throw new Error('Invalid recipient')
  }

  // Verify amount
  if (transaction.amount > maxAmount) {
    throw new Error('Amount exceeds limit')
  }

  // Verify user has sufficient balance
  const balance = await getBalance(transaction.from)
  if (balance < transaction.amount) {
    throw new Error('Insufficient balance')
  }

  return true
}

Verification Steps

  • Wallet signatures verified
  • Transaction details validated
  • Balance checks before transactions
  • No blind transaction signing

10. Dependency Security

Regular Updates

# Check for vulnerabilities
npm audit

# Fix automatically fixable issues
npm audit fix

# Update dependencies
npm update

# Check for outdated packages
npm outdated

Lock Files

# ALWAYS commit lock files
git add package-lock.json

# Use in CI/CD for reproducible builds
npm ci  # Instead of npm install

Verification Steps

  • Dependencies up to date
  • No known vulnerabilities (npm audit clean)
  • Lock files committed
  • Dependabot enabled on GitHub
  • Regular security updates

Security Testing

Automated Security Tests

// Test authentication
test('requires authentication', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/protected')
  expect(response.status).toBe(401)
})

// Test authorization
test('requires admin role', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/admin', {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
  })
  expect(response.status).toBe(403)
})

// Test input validation
test('rejects invalid input', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/users', {
    method: 'POST',
    body: JSON.stringify({ email: 'not-an-email' })
  })
  expect(response.status).toBe(400)
})

// Test rate limiting
test('enforces rate limits', async () => {
  const requests = Array(101).fill(null).map(() =>
    fetch('/api/endpoint')
  )

  const responses = await Promise.all(requests)
  const tooManyRequests = responses.filter(r => r.status === 429)

  expect(tooManyRequests.length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
})

Pre-Deployment Security Checklist

Before ANY production deployment:

  • Secrets: No hardcoded secrets, all in env vars
  • Input Validation: All user inputs validated
  • SQL Injection: All queries parameterized
  • XSS: User content sanitized
  • CSRF: Protection enabled
  • Authentication: Proper token handling
  • Authorization: Role checks in place
  • Rate Limiting: Enabled on all endpoints
  • HTTPS: Enforced in production
  • Security Headers: CSP, X-Frame-Options configured
  • Error Handling: No sensitive data in errors
  • Logging: No sensitive data logged
  • Dependencies: Up to date, no vulnerabilities
  • Row Level Security: Enabled in Supabase
  • CORS: Properly configured
  • File Uploads: Validated (size, type)
  • Wallet Signatures: Verified (if blockchain)

Resources


Remember: Security is not optional. One vulnerability can compromise the entire platform. When in doubt, err on the side of caution.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月5日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.3万2026年10月16日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题