跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

team-builder

按专业领域列出可用代理,最多选择五个并行完成同一任务,再将各自结果、共同结论、建议分歧和后续行动汇总为一份报告。

原文查看原文说明

Interactive picker that discovers available agent personas via the claude agents command and agents/ markdown globs, groups them into domains, has the user select up to five, dispatches them in parallel on one task, and synthesizes agreements and conflicts into a unified report. Use when composing a team of agents, browsing available agent personas, or running several specialist agents in parallel.

AI 评分80分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 查看可用的专业代理
  • 从不同领域选择代理
  • 发布前检查网站安全性与SEO
  • 比较多个代理的建议

中文介绍

功能

team-builder查找可用的专业代理,并按领域列出菜单,供你组队处理同一项任务。它通过claude agents和Markdown文件收集候选代理,最多同时运行五个。报告先分别展示每个代理的结果,再汇总共同结论、建议之间的分歧,以及下一步应采取的行动。

适用场景

适合手头有多个代理,却不确定该向谁提出任务的时候。如果希望从安全性和SEO等不同专业角度检查同一个对象,也可以使用。候选代理可以按编号或名称选择,方便你浏览现有角色后决定交给谁处理。

使用示例

  • “按专业领域列出可用的代理。”
  • “选择security和seo,审核即将发布的Next.js电商网站。”

注意事项

此流程使用claude agents和Agent工具。自定义代理需要提供描述其角色与操作步骤的Markdown文件。各代理独立工作,彼此不会讨论或交换意见。如果只选择一个代理,则直接展示其结果,不进行综合分析。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明浏览代理、最多选择五个、并行运行及汇总结果。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好具体说明发现来源、分类规则、选择方法、Agent调用、失败处理及报告结构。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
B部分不足要求确认选择,但未说明按Markdown指令运行的各代理的操作范围及确认流程。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足说明了Markdown格式与存放位置,但没有claude agents和Agent工具的安装配置步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Team Builder

Interactive menu for browsing and composing agent teams on demand. Works with flat or domain-subdirectory agent collections.

When to Use

  • You have multiple agent personas (markdown files) and want to pick which ones to use for a task
  • You want to compose an ad-hoc team from different domains (e.g., Security + SEO + Architecture)
  • You want to browse what agents are available before deciding

Prerequisites

Agent files must be markdown files containing a persona prompt (identity, rules, workflow, deliverables). The first # Heading is used as the agent name and the first paragraph as the description.

Both flat and subdirectory layouts are supported:

Subdirectory layout — domain is inferred from the folder name:

agents/
├── engineering/
│   ├── security-engineer.md
│   └── software-architect.md
├── marketing/
│   └── seo-specialist.md
└── sales/
    └── discovery-coach.md

Flat layout — domain inferred from shared filename prefixes. A prefix counts as a domain when 2+ files share it. Files with unique prefixes go to "General". Note: the algorithm splits at the first -, so multi-word domains (e.g., product-management) should use the subdirectory layout instead:

agents/
├── engineering-security-engineer.md
├── engineering-software-architect.md
├── marketing-seo-specialist.md
├── marketing-content-strategist.md
├── sales-discovery-coach.md
└── sales-outbound-strategist.md

Configuration

Agents are discovered via two methods, merged and deduplicated by agent name:

  1. claude agents command (primary) — run claude agents to get all agents known to the CLI, including user agents, plugin agents (e.g. ecc:architect), and built-in agents. This automatically covers ECC marketplace installs without any path configuration.
  2. File glob (fallback, for reading agent content) — agent markdown files are read from:
    • ./agents/**/*.md + ./agents/*.md — project-local agents
    • ~/.claude/agents/**/*.md + ~/.claude/agents/*.md — global user agents

Earlier sources take precedence when names collide: user agents > plugin agents > built-in agents. A custom path can be used instead if the user specifies one.

How It Works

Step 1: Discover Available Agents

Run claude agents to get the full agent list. Parse each line:

  • Plugin agents are prefixed with plugin-name: (e.g., ecc:security-reviewer). Use the part after : as the agent name and the plugin name as the domain.
  • User agents have no prefix. Read the corresponding markdown file from ~/.claude/agents/ or ./agents/ to extract the name and description.
  • Built-in agents (e.g., Explore, Plan) are skipped unless the user explicitly asks to include them.

For user agents loaded from markdown files:

  • Subdirectory layout: extract the domain from the parent folder name
  • Flat layout: collect all filename prefixes (text before the first -). A prefix qualifies as a domain only if it appears in 2 or more filenames (e.g., engineering-security-engineer.md and engineering-software-architect.md both start with engineering → Engineering domain). Files with unique prefixes (e.g., code-reviewer.md, tdd-guide.md) are grouped under "General"
  • Extract the agent name from the first # Heading. If no heading is found, derive the name from the filename (strip .md, replace hyphens with spaces, title-case)
  • Extract a one-line summary from the first paragraph after the heading

If no agents are found after running claude agents and probing file locations, inform the user: "No agents found. Run claude agents to verify your setup." Then stop.

Step 2: Present Domain Menu

Available agent domains:
1. Engineering — Software Architect, Security Engineer
2. Marketing — SEO Specialist
3. Sales — Discovery Coach, Outbound Strategist

Pick domains or name specific agents (e.g., "1,3" or "security + seo"):
  • Skip domains with zero agents (empty directories)
  • Show agent count per domain

Step 3: Handle Selection

Accept flexible input:

  • Numbers: "1,3" selects all agents from Engineering and Sales
  • Names: "security + seo" fuzzy-matches against discovered agents
  • "all from engineering" selects every agent in that domain

If more than 5 agents are selected, list them alphabetically and ask the user to narrow down: "You selected N agents (max 5). Pick which to keep, or say 'first 5' to use the first five alphabetically."

Confirm selection:

Selected: Security Engineer + SEO Specialist
What should they work on? (describe the task):

Step 4: Spawn Agents in Parallel

  1. Read each selected agent's markdown file
  2. Prompt for the task description if not already provided
  3. Spawn all agents in parallel using the Agent tool:
    • subagent_type: "general-purpose"
    • prompt: "{agent file content}\n\nTask: {task description}"
    • Each agent runs independently — no inter-agent communication needed
  4. If an agent fails (error, timeout, or empty output), note the failure inline (e.g., "Security Engineer: failed — [reason]") and continue with results from agents that succeeded

Step 5: Synthesize Results

Collect all outputs and present a unified report:

  • Results grouped by agent
  • Synthesis section highlighting:
    • Agreements across agents
    • Conflicts or tensions between recommendations
    • Recommended next steps

If only 1 agent was selected, skip synthesis and present the output directly.

Rules

  • Dynamic discovery only. Never hardcode agent lists. New files in the directory auto-appear in the menu.
  • Max 5 agents per team. More than 5 produces diminishing returns and excessive token usage. Enforce at selection time.
  • Parallel dispatch. All agents run simultaneously — use the Agent tool's parallel invocation pattern.
  • Parallel Agent calls, not TeamCreate. This skill uses parallel Agent tool calls for independent work. TeamCreate (a Claude Code tool for multi-agent dialogue) is only needed when agents must debate or respond to each other.

Examples

User: team builder

Claude:
Available agent domains:
1. Engineering (2) — Software Architect, Security Engineer
2. Marketing (1) — SEO Specialist
3. Sales (4) — Discovery Coach, Outbound Strategist, Proposal Strategist, Sales Engineer
4. Support (1) — Executive Summary

Pick domains or name specific agents:

User: security + seo

Claude:
Selected: Security Engineer + SEO Specialist
What should they work on?

User: Review my Next.js e-commerce site before launch

[Both agents spawn in parallel, each applying their specialty to the codebase]

Claude:
## Security Engineer Findings
- [findings...]

## SEO Specialist Findings
- [findings...]

## Synthesis
Both agents agree on: [...]
Tension: Security recommends CSP that blocks inline styles, SEO needs inline schema markup. Resolution: [...]
Next steps: [...]

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

accessibility

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。

  • 为纯图标按钮添加说明
  • 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
  • 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。

  • 排查仅在应用内出现的故障
  • 调查旧对话混入回答的原因
  • 核对工具漏执行或虚报执行
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-eval

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。

  • 用实际开发任务比较智能体
  • 采用新工具或模型前进行评估
  • 检查智能体更新后的性能
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-harness-construction

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。

  • 设计智能体工具及输入格式
  • 明确工具结果与下一步行动
  • 制定安全重试与停止条件
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。

  • 诊断代理连续失败
  • 调查重复调用工具的循环
  • 检查上下文积累导致的输出退化
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月5日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。

  • 排查重复调用工具的原因
  • 调查对话膨胀导致的质量下降
  • 核对文件路径与环境差异
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月16日 更新

查看 affaan-m 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题