跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

scan-tst

Use when: analysing a project's test health — coverage, robustness, and CI integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Test Perspective (TST)

Evaluates whether the project has a functioning, proportionate test suite. Assigns a score from 0.0 to 1.0 across two dimensions.

Dimensions

Coverage ratio — Are enough source files tested?

  • Score = min((testFileCount / sourceFileCount) * 2, 1.0) — 50%+ coverage = full score
  • 0 test files = 0.0 immediately (no further analysis needed)

Test script — Can the suite be run?

  • package.json must define scripts.test
  • Missing test script = 0.0 on this axis regardless of file count

Scoring

tst_score = (coverage_ratio + test_script) / 2

Edge case: if no test files exist at all, score is 0.0 and only one critical task is generated.

When test suite execution fails: If the test suite cannot be executed (missing dependencies, syntax errors, unavailable runtime), record this as a data gap rather than failure; note it in output and do not penalize the coverage score until the execution blocker is resolved.

Score interpretation:

  • 0.9–1.0 Test suite is healthy and runnable
  • 0.7–0.9 Good coverage but minor gaps
  • 0.5–0.7 Coverage is below target — significant untested surface
  • 0.0–0.5 Test suite is absent or severely inadequate — highest risk area

Tasks Generated

FindingPriority
No test files at allcritical
Test file ratio < 50%high
No scripts.test in package.jsonhigh

Agent Analysis Guide

When performing a manual TST analysis:

  1. Count source files (excluding test files) and test files separately
  2. Calculate the ratio and identify which source modules have zero test coverage
  3. Run the test suite if possible — note any failing tests, not just missing ones
  4. Check test speed: tests that take >30 seconds block CI feedback loops
  5. Look for edge cases that are clearly missing: empty inputs, null values, concurrent access, error paths
  6. Identify tests that only assert the happy path — these create false confidence
  7. Flag any test that mocks the database or external service when an integration test is possible

Output: ratio score, list of untested modules ordered by risk, and specific edge cases missing from existing tests.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when: Tester needs UI state evidence for VBR, or Builder needs to verify an integration wire is observable end-to-end. Powered by agent-browser MCP — token-efficient browser automation (200–400 tokens/page).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when drafting a bug or defect ticket, reviewing one someone else wrote, or deciding whether a reported problem is ready to file. Keeps what the reporter actually saw separate from what the agent later found out, so a reader can tell which lines are testimony and which are collected proof. Trigger phrases: 'file a bug', 'write up this defect', 'triage this report', 'is this ticket ready to file', 'what did the reporter actually see'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

查看 Agistra 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题