跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

self-improving-agent

Use when: the agent captures a correction from the team lead, hits an unexpected error, discovers a capability gap, or finds a better practice. Logs to .learnings/ and promotes durable patterns to permanent project memory.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Self-Improving Agent

Adapted from pskoett/self-improving-agent v3.0.21 — MIT License. Defines the mechanics that agent-foundations' WAL protocol routes through automatically: the trigger table below, the log formats, and the promotion rules for turning durable learnings into permanent project memory. This is not a skill an agent separately decides to load — WAL's "Learnings routing" step already folds a matching trigger into its mandatory write, the same turn it fires. Going forward, a correction or recurring pattern gets a structured .learnings/ entry as a matter of course, in the same motion as the agent-memory write, not as an afterthought that depends on remembering to open this file later.

When to Log

The five trigger types WAL's mandatory write scans for. When one matches, the .learnings/ entry is written as part of that same write — not a follow-up step to schedule for later.

TriggerWhere
Command or operation fails unexpectedly.learnings/ERRORS.md
the team lead corrects the agent ("No, that's wrong...", "Actually...").learnings/LEARNINGS.md — category: correction
the team lead requests a capability that does not exist.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
The agent's knowledge proves outdated or incorrect.learnings/LEARNINGS.md — category: knowledge_gap
A better approach is discovered for a recurring task.learnings/LEARNINGS.md — category: best_practice

Storage-plugin note: every .learnings/*.md path in this skill (the table above, First-Use Initialisation, Recurring Pattern Detection, Periodic Review) is the free-tier default. Before writing or reading, check for an active storage plugin file at storage/*.md — the same presence-gated check agent-foundations's Memory Path Resolution protocol uses for Memory/Task/Document. When one is present, writes route through that plugin's Learnings-store write-learning-entry(store, category, content) operation (store is LEARNINGS, ERRORS, or FEATURE_REQUESTS, matching the three files below) instead of a literal file write, and reads (Recurring Pattern Detection's search, Periodic Review's pending count) route through list-pending-learnings(store) instead of a raw grep. On free tier (no plugin file present), the literal paths below remain correct as-is.

Also review .learnings/ before starting a major task or entering a new codebase area — this review step is separate from the WAL-triggered logging above, and still requires the agent to actively open this file.


First-Use Initialisation

Free-tier only — see the Storage-plugin note above; on vault-backed tiers the plugin provisions Research/Learnings/ itself, no manual initialisation step applies. Before logging anything, ensure the .learnings/ directory exists in the project root. If missing, create:

.learnings/LEARNINGS.md
.learnings/ERRORS.md
.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Never overwrite existing files.

Do not log secrets, tokens, private keys, environment variables, or raw command output with sensitive data. Prefer short summaries or redacted excerpts.


Log Formats

Learning Entry — .learnings/LEARNINGS.md

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
One-line description of what was learned

### Details
What happened, what was wrong, what is correct

### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement

### Metadata
- Agent: architect | builder | tester | router
- Source: conversation | error | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001
- Pattern-Key: simplify.dead_code | harden.input_validation (optional)
- Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional)

---

Error Entry — .learnings/ERRORS.md

## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
Brief description of what failed

### Error
Actual error message or output (redact secrets)

### Context
- Command attempted
- Input or parameters used
- Environment details if relevant

### Suggested Fix
If identifiable, what might resolve this

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- See Also: ERR-20250110-001

---

Feature Request Entry — .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Requested Capability
What the team lead wanted to do

### User Context
Why it was needed, what problem it solves

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built

### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_feature_name

---

ID Format

TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX where TYPE is LRN, ERR, or FEAT and XXX is a sequential number or 3-char token.


Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update the entry:

  1. Change **Status**: pending → **Status**: resolved
  2. Add after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: ISO-8601 timestamp
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Notes**: Brief description of what was done

Other status values: in_progress, wont_fix, promoted.


Promotion to Project Memory

When a learning applies across multiple files or features, or prevents a recurring mistake, promote it.

Promotion targetWhat goes there
memory/<agent>.md COLD section (or the active storage plugin's memory store on vault-backed tiers — see the storage-plugin note below)Project facts, conventions, verified practices
AGENTS.md in the workspaceWorkflow improvements, automation rules — applies to Codex and GitHub Copilot environments; for Claude Code the equivalent is CLAUDE.md
.cursor/rules/*.mdcWorkflow improvements, automation rules — Cursor's equivalent mechanism to the CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md row above
~/.claude/projects/.../memory/ auto-memoryCross-project patterns and preferences — Claude-Code-only; there is no equivalent promotion target on Cursor, Codex, or GitHub Copilot

Storage-plugin note (memory/<agent>.md COLD row): before promoting to memory/<agent>.md, check for an active storage plugin file at skills/agent-foundations/storage/*.md — the same presence-gated check agent-foundations's Memory Path Resolution protocol uses. If no plugin file is present, the literal memory/<agent>.md path is correct as-is (free-tier default). If a plugin file is present (vault-backed tier, e.g. dev:sub/ops), the literal repo-relative path is wrong — promote instead via that plugin's write-memory-entry(agent, 'COLD', content) operation (see agent-foundations's Memory Path Resolution protocol and the active plugin file, e.g. storage/obsidian.md, for the authoritative procedure). Writing to the literal path on a vault-backed tier creates a stray file outside the vault, bypassing the knowledge index.

Promotion threshold

Promote when Recurrence-Count >= 3, seen across at least 2 distinct tasks, within a 30-day window.

After promoting: change **Status**: pending → **Status**: promoted and add **Promoted**: <target file>.


Recurring Pattern Detection

Before logging, search: grep -r "keyword" .learnings/

If a match exists, link entries with See Also and increment Recurrence-Count. Recurring patterns indicate missing documentation, missing automation, or an architectural problem — consider a ticket.


Periodic Review

Review .learnings/ at natural breakpoints: before a major task, after completing a feature, or weekly during active development.

# Count pending items
grep -h '\*\*Status\*\*: pending' .learnings/*.md | wc -l

# List high-priority pending
grep -B5 '\*\*Priority\*\*: high' .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when: Tester needs UI state evidence for VBR, or Builder needs to verify an integration wire is observable end-to-end. Powered by agent-browser MCP — token-efficient browser automation (200–400 tokens/page).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Use when drafting a bug or defect ticket, reviewing one someone else wrote, or deciding whether a reported problem is ready to file. Keeps what the reporter actually saw separate from what the agent later found out, so a reader can tell which lines are testimony and which are collected proof. Trigger phrases: 'file a bug', 'write up this defect', 'triage this report', 'is this ticket ready to file', 'what did the reporter actually see'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月14日 更新

查看 Agistra 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题