跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials

Extract ten baseline characteristics from a clinical trial article. Given a PMID, the workflow checks PubMed for basic metadata; when that is incomplete or unavailable, it uses the supplied full text to produce structured JSON and marks unreported fields as null or empty.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Extracting baseline details from a clinical trial article
  • Organizing study and participant information from full text
  • Checking a PMID and completing missing details from article text
  • Creating structured JSON from trial baseline data

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials_audit_result_v1.json12.1 KB
  • references/extraction_schema.md1.2 KB
  • scripts/extract_pdf.py2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Baseline Extraction (RCT)

This skill extracts 10 key baseline characteristics from clinical trial articles. It implements a hybrid workflow:

  1. PubMed Lookup: Checks PubMed API using the PMID to verify existence and get basic metadata.
  2. LLM Extraction: Analyzes the article text to extract detailed baseline data (since PubMed metadata is limited).

When to Use

  • Use this skill when you need extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or pmid. checks pubmed for metadata; always falls back to llm extraction for full details in a reproducible workflow.
  • Use this skill when a data analytics task needs a packaged method instead of ad-hoc freeform output.
  • Use this skill when the user expects a concrete deliverable, validation step, or file-based result.
  • Use this skill when scripts/extract_pdf.py is the most direct path to complete the request.
  • Use this skill when you need the baseline-extraction for clinical trials package behavior rather than a generic answer.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/extract_pdf.py.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials"
python -m py_compile scripts/extract_pdf.py
python scripts/extract_pdf.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/extract_pdf.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/extract_pdf.py.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Workflow

Step 1: Check PubMed (Deterministic)

If the user provides a PMID, use the baseline_extractor.py script to check PubMed.

import subprocess
import json

# Replace <PMID> with actual PMID
result = subprocess.run(["python", "scripts/baseline_extractor.py", "<PMID>"], capture_output=True, text=True)
print(result.stdout)

Analyze the Script Output:

  • If status is "success": Stop here. Return the data JSON to the user.
  • If status is "not_found", "incomplete", or "error" (or if no PMID was provided): Proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: LLM Extraction (Fallback)

If Step 1 did not yield a complete result, use the LLM to extract the information from the full article text.

Input:

  • Full article text provided by the user.

Instructions:

  1. Read the Extraction Schema carefully.
  2. Analyze the text to identify all 10 required fields.
  3. Ensure the output is strictly in the JSON format defined in the schema.
  4. Constraint: Do not hallucinate. If a field is not mentioned in the text, set it to null or an empty string.

Output

Return the final result as a Markdown code block containing the JSON object.

{
  "study": "...",
  "region": "...",
  ...
}

Helper Scripts

PDF Text Extraction

When the user provides a PDF file path, use extract_pdf.py to extract the text content before assessment:

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Condense an academic paper into a structured abstract of up to 250 words, organized by background, objective, methods, results, and conclusion. It aims to retain key quantitative findings and supports papers from several research fields; figures and charts are not interpreted.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Creating a concise abstract from a research paper
  • Summarizing empirical studies while retaining key statistics
  • Preparing structured summaries across multiple papers
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Trim English academic abstracts to a target word count while preserving key findings, statistics, and the background-to-conclusion structure. Choose conservative, balanced, or aggressive compression, check word counts, and review the edited text for readability and accuracy.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Cutting an abstract to meet a journal word limit
  • Preparing a conference abstract with a strict word count
  • Checking an abstract's word count before submission
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Refines long medical drafts, reports, or literature notes into formal, single-paragraph Chinese and English abstracts in an SCI journal style. It can place both abstracts in a Markdown report while keeping claims grounded in the source text.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Condensing a medical study report into bilingual abstracts
  • Preparing unstructured abstracts from literature notes
  • Creating a Markdown report with Chinese and English abstracts
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
  • Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
  • Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Predicts absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties for small molecules from their structures. Use the results to compare compounds, screen libraries, and review drug-likeness scores in structured outputs. Predictions support prioritization and need experimental validation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Compare predicted ADME profiles for small-molecule candidates
  • Screen a compound library for drug-likeness
  • Rank candidates against target property ranges
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

查看 aipoch 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题