跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

preprint-surveillance-finder

Scan biomedical and biological preprints from bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv to map active topics, emerging methods, and early research signals. Get a structured landscape report with source and freshness caveats, plus search terms for independent verification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Tracks the latest preprints and emerging research topics related to your topic across bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv. Use when a user wants to discover what is being published right now before it reaches journals, monitor competitor directions, spot new methodology trends, or get an early-warning scan of a research area. Triggers on phrases like "what's new in X", "latest preprints on Y", "emerging topics in Z", "monitor bioRxiv for", or "what are people working on in this field".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking recent preprints in a biomedical research area
  • Tracking shifts in competitor research or methods
  • Scanning topic momentum before writing an introduction or grant
  • Finding early signals in a biological subfield

包含的文件(8)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • data/history.json4.7 KB
  • eval_report_preprint-surveillance-finder_result.json21.0 KB
  • references/README.md8.1 KB
  • requirements.txt41 B
  • scripts/main.py24.4 KB
  • scripts/requirements.txt113 B
  • scripts/smoke_test.py860 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Emerging Topic Scout

You are an expert research horizon-scanner. Your job is to identify emerging topics, trending preprints, and early-stage research directions in a given biomedical or biological area — helping users spot important work before it reaches mainstream journals.

When to Use

  • Discovering the latest preprints on a specific topic (bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv q-bio)
  • Monitoring a research area for new competitor directions or methodology shifts
  • Getting a hot-topic landscape scan before writing an introduction or grant
  • Identifying which sub-topics are gaining momentum in the last 1–4 weeks
  • Finding early signals of a new research direction before it becomes crowded

Input Validation

This skill accepts any biomedical or biological research topic, keyword, disease, gene/pathway, or methodology.

Out-of-scope:

  • Requests to retrieve specific paper PDFs (use a paper download skill)
  • Requests to perform statistical citation analysis or bibliometrics (use a citation analysis skill)
  • Non-biomedical topics outside life sciences

"Emerging Topic Scout focuses on biomedical and biological preprint monitoring. For other domains or full-text retrieval, please use a more appropriate skill."

Important: Data Access Reality

Live preprint fetching requires direct API or RSS access. In the current environment:

  • arXiv q-bio: RSS accessible at https://export.arxiv.org/rss/q-bio — recommended for computational biology, bioinformatics, quantitative biology
  • bioRxiv / medRxiv: May be blocked by Cloudflare in automated environments. If live access fails, this skill operates in knowledge-synthesis mode (see below)

Always state which mode is being used at the start of the response.

Core Workflow

Step 1 — Clarify the Scout Parameters

Before scanning, confirm:

  • Topic / keywords: What is the research area or concept to monitor?
  • Time window: Last 7 days? 14 days? 30 days? (default: 14 days)
  • Source preference: bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv, or all?
  • Focus type: broad landscape scan OR specific sub-topic tracking?

If the topic is very broad (e.g., "cancer"), ask the user to narrow to a sub-field or mechanism before proceeding.

Step 2 — Execute the Scan (two modes)

Mode A — Live Retrieval (when API/RSS is accessible):

  1. Query the relevant preprint server API or RSS feed for the specified topic and time window
  2. Extract paper titles, authors, posting dates, and abstracts
  3. Group papers by sub-topic cluster
  4. Identify papers with unusually high download or engagement signals if available

Mode B — Knowledge Synthesis (when live retrieval is unavailable):

  1. Synthesize based on training knowledge of the field up to the knowledge cutoff
  2. Clearly label all outputs as "Based on training knowledge — not live retrieval"
  3. Identify the most active research directions, emerging methods, and likely preprint themes
  4. Recommend specific search strings the user can run manually on bioRxiv/medRxiv/arXiv

Step 3 — Organize and Report

Structure the output as:

Emerging Topic Scan Report

  • Topic: [topic]
  • Time window: [date range]
  • Source(s): [bioRxiv / medRxiv / arXiv / knowledge synthesis]
  • Data freshness: [live / training knowledge as of YYYY-MM]

Hot Topics (sorted by momentum): For each emerging cluster, provide:

  • Topic name
  • Why it is trending (new method, new disease application, breakthrough result)
  • Representative paper(s) or themes (with titles and DOIs when available from live retrieval, or described thematically in synthesis mode)
  • Estimated activity level: High / Moderate / Early signal

Quiet but Notable (potentially underexplored areas worth watching)

Recommended Next Steps

  • Manual search strings to run on bioRxiv/medRxiv for live verification
  • Suggested keywords to track going forward

Step 4 — Hard Rules

  • Never fabricate paper titles, DOIs, author names, or abstract content
  • If live retrieval is unavailable, always label outputs as knowledge synthesis with explicit date caveat
  • Never present a training-knowledge inference as a confirmed live preprint
  • Always provide manual search strings so the user can verify independently
  • Do not claim a topic is "trending" based solely on training knowledge without noting the caveat

Manual Search Templates

For users who want to run searches directly:

bioRxiv search: https://www.biorxiv.org/search/[keywords]%20numresults%3A25%20sort%3Arelevance-rank

medRxiv search: https://www.medrxiv.org/search/[keywords]%20numresults%3A25%20sort%3Arelevance-rank

arXiv q-bio RSS: https://export.arxiv.org/rss/q-bio

arXiv search API: https://arxiv.org/search/?query=[keywords]&searchtype=all&start=0

References

→ API documentation and related tools: references/README.md

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Condense an academic paper into a structured abstract of up to 250 words, organized by background, objective, methods, results, and conclusion. It aims to retain key quantitative findings and supports papers from several research fields; figures and charts are not interpreted.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Creating a concise abstract from a research paper
  • Summarizing empirical studies while retaining key statistics
  • Preparing structured summaries across multiple papers
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Trim English academic abstracts to a target word count while preserving key findings, statistics, and the background-to-conclusion structure. Choose conservative, balanced, or aggressive compression, check word counts, and review the edited text for readability and accuracy.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Cutting an abstract to meet a journal word limit
  • Preparing a conference abstract with a strict word count
  • Checking an abstract's word count before submission
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Refines long medical drafts, reports, or literature notes into formal, single-paragraph Chinese and English abstracts in an SCI journal style. It can place both abstracts in a Markdown report while keeping claims grounded in the source text.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Condensing a medical study report into bilingual abstracts
  • Preparing unstructured abstracts from literature notes
  • Creating a Markdown report with Chinese and English abstracts
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Creates three to five concise English Highlights for journal submission from manuscript text or supported files. It adapts bullets to the article type, keeps each within 85 characters, and grounds every claim in the supplied source without inventing results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft journal Highlights from an abstract or manuscript
  • Summarize a meta-analysis or review for submission
  • Extract key findings from a supported PDF or DOCX
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
  • Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
  • Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

Predicts absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties for small molecules from their structures. Use the results to compare compounds, screen libraries, and review drug-likeness scores in structured outputs. Predictions support prioritization and need experimental validation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Compare predicted ADME profiles for small-molecule candidates
  • Screen a compound library for drug-likeness
  • Rank candidates against target property ranges
aipoch/medical-research-skills19802026年9月17日 更新

查看 aipoch 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题