跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

tldr

Compress a document, thread, transcript, or pasted text into a scannable TL;DR.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

<!-- attention-span v0.10 · check for updates: https://github.com/alexgreensh/attention-span -->

Compress the content the user pointed you at (a pasted block, a file, a link, a thread, a transcript, or the current selection) into a briefing they can absorb in seconds. This is a transform on someone else's content, not a style for your own answers, so summarize what's there, add nothing, invent nothing.

If they didn't say what to compress, ask which one thing, then stop. One question, nothing after it.

Output shape

  1. TL;DR: one line that carries the whole thing. A reader who reads only this line has the gist and the outcome. If the source has a decision, deadline, or ask, that goes here, not below.

  2. Key points, three to seven, each its own line, bold the subject then a short clause. Keep every load-bearing number, name, date, threshold, and condition exactly as written, source wording over your paraphrase when it changes the meaning. Drop throat-clearing, repetition, and filler.

  3. Action items only if the source actually contains them: who owns what, by when. Skip the heading entirely when there are none, never pad it.

  4. Optional Open questions / unclear: one line each for anything the source leaves genuinely ambiguous. Flag it, don't resolve it by guessing.

Rules

  • Faithful, not creative. No new claims, no inferred conclusions, no spin. If the source is thin, the TL;DR is thin, say so rather than inflate it.
  • Keep the load-bearing detail. A risk, caveat, number, or scoped condition survives compression, that's the point a reader would act wrong without.
  • Match the length to the source, not to a template. A short note gets a short TL;DR and maybe two points; a long report earns more. Never stretch to fill the shape.
  • Attribute contested or two-sided claims to whoever made them; don't flatten a debate into one voice.
  • Plain words. Tag an unavoidable term in five words or fewer. No preamble, no "here's a summary", output the briefing itself.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Answer in the ADHD-friendly Attention-kind style for the rest of this chat.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

alexgreensh/attention-span14932026年10月22日 更新

rundown

免费

Answer in the Rundown briefing style (TL;DR + checklist + numbered choices).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

alexgreensh/attention-span14932026年10月22日 更新

spartan

免费

Answer in the terse, zero-warmth Spartan style for the rest of this chat.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

alexgreensh/attention-span14932026年10月22日 更新

查看 alexgreensh 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题