跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

company-os

Build a consistent way to run a company by defining responsibilities, weekly metrics, meeting schedules, and quarterly priorities. Compare management frameworks and develop practical routines for resolving issues, tracking commitments, and sharing company information.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

The meta-framework for how a company runs — the connective tissue between all C-suite roles. Covers operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks. Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, building accountability systems, implementing OKRs, or when user mentions EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Choose a company management framework
  • Clarify who owns each business function
  • Design weekly metrics and leadership meetings
  • Set quarterly priorities and issue-resolution routines

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md10.5 KB
  • references/implementation-guide.md9.8 KB
  • references/os-comparison.md10.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Company Operating System

The operating system is the collection of tools, rhythms, and agreements that determine how the company functions. Every company has one — most just don't know what it is. Making it explicit makes it improvable.

Keywords

operating system, EOS, Entrepreneurial Operating System, Scaling Up, Rockefeller Habits, OKR, Holacracy, L10 meeting, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, issues list, IDS, meeting pulse, quarterly planning, weekly scorecard, management framework, company rhythm, traction, Gino Wickman, Verne Harnish

Why This Matters

Most operational dysfunction isn't a people problem — it's a system problem. When:

  • The same issues recur every week: no issue resolution system
  • Meetings feel pointless: no structured meeting pulse
  • Nobody knows who owns what: no accountability chart
  • Quarterly goals slip: rocks aren't real commitments

Fix the system. The people will operate better inside it.

The Six Core Components

Every effective operating system has these six, regardless of which framework you choose:

1. Accountability Chart

Not an org chart. An accountability chart answers: "Who owns this outcome?"

Key distinction: One person owns each function. Multiple people may work in it. Ownership means the buck stops with one person.

Structure:

CEO
├── Sales (CRO/VP Sales)
│   ├── Inbound pipeline
│   └── Outbound pipeline
├── Product & Engineering (CTO/CPO)
│   ├── Product roadmap
│   └── Engineering delivery
├── Operations (COO)
│   ├── Customer success
│   └── Finance & Legal
└── People (CHRO/VP People)
    ├── Recruiting
    └── People operations

Rules:

  • No shared ownership. "Alice and Bob both own it" means nobody owns it.
  • One person can own multiple seats at early stages. That's fine. Just be explicit.
  • Revisit quarterly as you scale. Ownership shifts as the company grows.

Build it in a workshop:

  1. List all functions the company performs
  2. Assign one owner per function — no exceptions
  3. Identify gaps (functions nobody owns) and overlaps (functions two people think they own)
  4. Publish it. Update it when something changes.

2. Scorecard

Weekly metrics that tell you if the company is on track. Not monthly. Not quarterly. Weekly.

Rules:

  • 5–15 metrics maximum. More than 15 and nothing gets attention.
  • Each metric has an owner and a weekly target (not a range — a number).
  • Red/yellow/green status. Not paragraphs.
  • The scorecard is discussed at the leadership team weekly meeting. Only red metrics get discussion time.

Example scorecard structure:

MetricOwnerTargetThis WeekStatus
New MRRCRO€50K€43K🔴
ChurnCS Lead< 1%0.8%🟢
Active usersCPO2,0002,150🟢
DeploymentsCTO3/week3🟢
Open critical bugsCTO02🔴
RunwayCFO> 18mo16mo🟡

Anti-pattern: Measuring everything. If you track 40 KPIs, you're watching, not managing.

3. Meeting Pulse

The meeting rhythm that drives the company. Not optional — the pulse is what keeps the company alive.

The full rhythm:

MeetingFrequencyDurationWhoPurpose
Daily standupDaily15 minEach teamBlockers only
L10 / Leadership syncWeekly90 minLeadership teamScorecard + issues
Department reviewMonthly60 minDept + leadershipOKR progress
Quarterly planningQuarterly1–2 daysLeadershipSet rocks, review strategy
Annual planningAnnual2–3 daysLeadership1-year + 3-year vision

The L10 meeting (Weekly Leadership Sync): Named for the goal of each meeting being a 10/10. Fixed agenda:

  1. Good news (5 min) — personal + business
  2. Scorecard review (5 min) — flag red items only
  3. Rock review (5 min) — on/off track for each rock
  4. Customer/employee headlines (5 min)
  5. Issues list (60 min) — IDS (see below)
  6. To-dos review (5 min) — last week's commitments
  7. Conclude (5 min) — rate the meeting 1–10, what would make it a 10 next time

4. Issue Resolution (IDS)

The core problem-solving loop. Maximum 15 minutes per issue.

IDS: Identify, Discuss, Solve

  • Identify: What is the actual issue? (Not the symptom — the root cause) State it in one sentence.
  • Discuss: Relevant facts + perspectives. Time-boxed. When discussion starts repeating, stop.
  • Solve: One owner. One action. One due date. Written on the to-do list.

Anti-patterns:

  • "Let's take this offline" — most things taken offline never get resolved
  • Discussing without deciding — a great discussion with no action item is wasted time
  • Revisiting decided issues — once solved, it leaves the list. Reopen only with new information.

The Issues List: A running, prioritized list of all unresolved issues. Owned by the leadership team. Reviewed and pruned weekly. If an issue has been on the list for 3+ meetings and hasn't been discussed, it's either not a real issue or it's too scary to address — both deserve attention.

5. Rocks (90-Day Priorities)

Rocks are the 3–7 most important things each person must accomplish in the next 90 days. They're not the job description — they're the things that move the company forward.

Why 90 days? Long enough for meaningful progress. Short enough to stay real.

Rock rules:

  • Each person: 3–7 rocks maximum. More than 7 and none get done.
  • Company-level rocks (shared priorities): 3–7 for the leadership team
  • Each rock is binary: done or not done. No "60% complete."
  • Set at the quarterly planning session. Reviewed weekly (on/off track).

Bad rock: "Improve our sales process" Good rock: "Implement Salesforce CRM with full pipeline stages and weekly reporting by March 31"

Rock vs. to-do: A to-do takes one action. A rock takes 90 days of consistent work.

6. Communication Cadence

Who gets what information, when, and how.

AudienceWhatWhenFormat
All employeesCompany updateMonthlyWritten + Q&A
All employeesQuarterly results + next prioritiesQuarterlyAll-hands
Leadership teamScorecardWeeklyDashboard
BoardCompany performanceMonthlyBoard memo
InvestorsKey metrics + narrativeMonthly or quarterlyInvestor update
CustomersProduct updatesPer releaseRelease notes

Default rule: If you're deciding whether to share something internally, share it. The cost of under-communication always exceeds the cost of over-communication inside a company.


Operating System Selection

See references/os-comparison.md for full comparison. Quick guide:

If you are...Consider...
10–250 person company, founder-led, operational chaosEOS / Traction
Ambitious growth company, need rigorous strategy cascadeScaling Up
Tech company, engineering culture, hypothesis-drivenOKR-native
Decentralized, flat, high autonomyHolacracy (only if you're patient)
None of the above quite fitCustom hybrid

Implementation Roadmap

Don't implement everything at once. See references/implementation-guide.md for the full 90-day plan.

Quick start (first 30 days):

  1. Build the accountability chart (1 workshop, 2 hours)
  2. Define 5–10 weekly scorecard metrics (leadership team alignment, 1 hour)
  3. Start the weekly L10 meeting (no prep — just start)

These three alone will improve coordination more than most companies achieve in a year.


Common Failure Modes

Partial implementation: "We do OKRs but skip the weekly check-in." Half an operating system is worse than none — it creates theater without accountability.

Meeting fatigue: Adding the full rhythm on top of existing meetings. Start by replacing meetings, not adding them.

Metric overload: Starting with 30 KPIs because "they all matter." Start with 5. Add when the cadence is established.

Rock inflation: Setting 12 rocks per person because "everything is a priority." When everything is a priority, nothing is. Hard limit: 7.

Leader non-compliance: Leadership team skips the L10 or doesn't follow IDS. The operating system mirrors the respect leadership gives it. If leaders don't take it seriously, nobody will.

Annual planning without quarterly review: Setting annual goals and checking in at year-end. Quarterly is the minimum review cycle for any meaningful goal.


Integration with C-Suite

The company OS is the connective tissue. Every other role depends on it:

C-Suite RoleOS Dependency
CEOSets vision that feeds into 1-year plan and rocks
COOOwns the meeting pulse and issue resolution cadence
CFOOwns the financial metrics in the scorecard
CTOOwns engineering rocks and tech scorecard metrics
CHROOwns people metrics (attrition, hiring velocity) in scorecard
Culture ArchitectCulture rituals plug into the meeting pulse
Strategic Alignment EngineValidates that team rocks cascade from company rocks

Key Questions for the Operating System

  • "If I asked five different team leads what the company's top 3 priorities are this quarter, would they give the same answers?"
  • "What was the most important issue raised in last week's leadership meeting? Was it resolved or is it still open?"
  • "Name a metric that would tell us by Friday whether this week was a good week. Do we track it?"
  • "Who owns customer churn? Can you name that person without hesitation?"
  • "When was the last time we updated the accountability chart?"

Detailed References

  • references/os-comparison.md — EOS vs Scaling Up vs OKRs vs Holacracy vs hybrid
  • references/implementation-guide.md — 90-day implementation plan

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9万2026年10月23日 更新

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9万2026年10月23日 更新

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9万2026年10月23日 更新

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9万2026年10月23日 更新

aeo

免费

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9万2026年10月23日 更新

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9万2026年10月23日 更新

查看 alirezarezvani 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题