ハイブリッドモード、段階的コンポーネント書き換え、依存性注入更新を使用してAngularJSからAngularへ移行します。AngularJSアプリケーションのアップグレード、フレームワーク移行の計画、またはレガシーAngularコードのモダナイゼーション時に使用します。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Define and implement Service Level Indicators (SLIs) and Service Level Objectives (SLOs) with error budgets and alerting. Use when establishing reliability targets, implementing SRE practices, or measuring service performance.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Framework for defining and implementing Service Level Indicators (SLIs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and error budgets.
Implement measurable reliability targets using SLIs, SLOs, and error budgets to balance reliability with innovation velocity.
SLA (Service Level Agreement)
↓ Contract with customers
SLO (Service Level Objective)
↓ Internal reliability target
SLI (Service Level Indicator)
↓ Actual measurement
# Successful requests / Total requests
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
# Requests below latency threshold / Total requests
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
# Successful writes / Total writes
sum(storage_writes_successful_total)
/
sum(storage_writes_total)
Reference: See references/slo-definitions.md
| SLO % | Downtime/Month | Downtime/Year |
|---|---|---|
| 99% | 7.2 hours | 3.65 days |
| 99.9% | 43.2 minutes | 8.76 hours |
| 99.95% | 21.6 minutes | 4.38 hours |
| 99.99% | 4.32 minutes | 52.56 minutes |
Consider:
Example SLOs:
slos:
- name: api_availability
target: 99.9
window: 28d
sli: |
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
- name: api_latency_p95
target: 99
window: 28d
sli: |
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
Error Budget = 1 - SLO Target
Example:
error_budget_policy:
- remaining_budget: 100%
action: Normal development velocity
- remaining_budget: 50%
action: Consider postponing risky changes
- remaining_budget: 10%
action: Freeze non-critical changes
- remaining_budget: 0%
action: Feature freeze, focus on reliability
Reference: See references/error-budget.md
# SLI Recording Rules
groups:
- name: sli_rules
interval: 30s
rules:
# Availability SLI
- record: sli:http_availability:ratio
expr: |
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
# Latency SLI (requests < 500ms)
- record: sli:http_latency:ratio
expr: |
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
- name: slo_rules
interval: 5m
rules:
# SLO compliance (1 = meeting SLO, 0 = violating)
- record: slo:http_availability:compliance
expr: sli:http_availability:ratio >= bool 0.999
- record: slo:http_latency:compliance
expr: sli:http_latency:ratio >= bool 0.99
# Error budget remaining (percentage)
- record: slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining
expr: |
(sli:http_availability:ratio - 0.999) / (1 - 0.999) * 100
# Error budget burn rate
- record: slo:http_availability:burn_rate_5m
expr: |
(1 - (
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[5m]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
)) / (1 - 0.999)
groups:
- name: slo_alerts
interval: 1m
rules:
# Fast burn: 14.4x rate, 1 hour window
# Consumes 2% error budget in 1 hour
- alert: SLOErrorBudgetBurnFast
expr: |
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_1h > 14.4
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_5m > 14.4
for: 2m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "Fast error budget burn detected"
description: "Error budget burning at {{ $value }}x rate"
# Slow burn: 6x rate, 6 hour window
# Consumes 5% error budget in 6 hours
- alert: SLOErrorBudgetBurnSlow
expr: |
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_6h > 6
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_30m > 6
for: 15m
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Slow error budget burn detected"
description: "Error budget burning at {{ $value }}x rate"
# Error budget exhausted
- alert: SLOErrorBudgetExhausted
expr: slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining < 0
for: 5m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "SLO error budget exhausted"
description: "Error budget remaining: {{ $value }}%"
Grafana Dashboard Structure:
┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SLO Compliance (Current) │
│ ✓ 99.95% (Target: 99.9%) │
├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Error Budget Remaining: 65% │
│ ████████░░ 65% │
├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SLI Trend (28 days) │
│ [Time series graph] │
├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Burn Rate Analysis │
│ [Burn rate by time window] │
└────────────────────────────────────┘
Example Queries:
# Current SLO compliance
sli:http_availability:ratio * 100
# Error budget remaining
slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining
# Days until error budget exhausted (at current burn rate)
(slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining / 100)
*
28
/
(1 - sli:http_availability:ratio) * (1 - 0.999)
# Combination of short and long windows reduces false positives
rules:
- alert: SLOBurnRateHigh
expr: |
(
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_1h > 14.4
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_5m > 14.4
)
or
(
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_6h > 6
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_30m > 6
)
labels:
severity: critical
assets/slo-template.md - SLO definition templatereferences/slo-definitions.md - SLO definition patternsreferences/error-budget.md - Error budget calculationsprometheus-configuration - For metric collectiongrafana-dashboards - For SLO visualization还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
ハイブリッドモード、段階的コンポーネント書き換え、依存性注入更新を使用してAngularJSからAngularへ移行します。AngularJSアプリケーションのアップグレード、フレームワーク移行の計画、またはレガシーAngularコードのモダナイゼーション時に使用します。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Migrate from AngularJS to Angular using hybrid mode, incremental component rewriting, and dependency injection updates. Use when upgrading AngularJS applications, planning framework migrations, or modernizing legacy Angular code.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
開発者を喜ばせる直感的でスケーラブルで保守可能なAPIを構築するために、RESTとGraphQL APIの設計原則をマスターします。新しいAPIの設計、API仕様のレビュー、またはAPI設計標準の確立時に使用してください。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
クリーンアーキテクチャ、ヘキサゴナルアーキテクチャ、ドメイン駆動設計を含む実証済みのバックエンドアーキテクチャパターンを実装します。複雑なバックエンドシステムの設計や、保守性向上のための既存アプリケーションのリファクタリング時に使用します。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。