跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

detecting-aws-iam-privilege-escalation

Detect AWS IAM privilege escalation paths using boto3 and Cloudsplaining policy analysis to identify overly permissive policies, dangerous permission combinations, and least-privilege violations

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具AWS
查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.2 KB
  • scripts/agent.py9.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Detecting AWS IAM Privilege Escalation

Overview

This skill uses boto3 and Cloudsplaining-style analysis to identify IAM privilege escalation paths in AWS accounts. It downloads the account authorization details, analyzes each policy for dangerous permission combinations (iam:PassRole + lambda:CreateFunction, iam:CreatePolicyVersion, sts:AssumeRole), and flags policies that violate least-privilege principles.

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require detecting aws iam privilege escalation
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.8+ with boto3 library
  • AWS credentials with IAM read-only access (iam:GetAccountAuthorizationDetails)
  • Optional: cloudsplaining Python package for HTML report generation

Steps

  1. Download IAM Authorization Details — Call iam:GetAccountAuthorizationDetails to retrieve all users, groups, roles, and policies
  2. Analyze Policies for Privilege Escalation — Check each policy for known escalation permission combinations
  3. Identify Wildcard Resource Policies — Flag policies using Resource: "*" with dangerous actions
  4. Map Principal-to-Policy Relationships — Build a graph of which principals can access which escalation paths
  5. Score and Prioritize Findings — Rank findings by severity based on escalation vector type
  6. Generate Report — Produce structured JSON report with remediation guidance

Expected Output

  • JSON report of privilege escalation findings with severity scores
  • List of dangerous permission combinations per principal
  • Wildcard resource policy audit results
  • Remediation recommendations for each finding

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha112026年10月21日 更新

Audit, detect, and remediate Shadow Credentials misconfigurations on msDS-KeyCredentialLink in Active Directory. Focuses on access-controls, monitoring Event ID 5136, and credential-management hygiene.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha112026年10月21日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha112026年10月21日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha112026年10月21日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha112026年10月21日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha112026年10月21日 更新

查看 andycungkrinx91 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题