跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods

Detect and prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具Kubernetes

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(7)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB
  • assets/template.md1.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md1.2 KB
  • references/standards.md1.0 KB
  • references/workflows.md1.2 KB
  • scripts/agent.py4.2 KB
  • scripts/process.py5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods

Overview

Privilege escalation in Kubernetes occurs when a pod or container gains elevated permissions beyond its intended scope. This includes running as root, using privileged mode, mounting host filesystems, enabling dangerous Linux capabilities, or exploiting kernel vulnerabilities. Detection combines admission control (prevention), runtime monitoring (detection), and audit logging (investigation).

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require detecting privilege escalation in kubernetes pods
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • Kubernetes cluster v1.25+ (Pod Security Admission support)
  • kubectl with cluster-admin access
  • Falco or similar runtime security tool
  • OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno for admission policies

Privilege Escalation Vectors in Kubernetes

VectorRiskDetection Method
privileged: trueFull host accessAdmission control + audit
hostPID: trueAccess host processesAdmission control
hostNetwork: trueAccess host network stackAdmission control
hostPath volumesRead/write host filesystemAdmission control
SYS_ADMIN capabilityNear-privileged accessAdmission + runtime
allowPrivilegeEscalation: truesetuid/setgid exploitationAdmission control
runAsUser: 0Container rootAdmission control
automountServiceAccountTokenToken theft for API accessAdmission control
Writable /proc or /sysKernel parameter manipulationRuntime monitoring

Detection with Admission Control

Pod Security Admission (Built-in)

# Enforce restricted policy on namespace
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: production
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted

OPA Gatekeeper Policies

# Block dangerous capabilities
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
  name: k8sdangerouspriv
spec:
  crd:
    spec:
      names:
        kind: K8sDangerousPriv
  targets:
    - target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
      rego: |
        package k8sdangerouspriv

        dangerous_caps := {"SYS_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", "SYS_MODULE", "DAC_OVERRIDE", "NET_ADMIN", "NET_RAW"}

        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
          cap := container.securityContext.capabilities.add[_]
          dangerous_caps[cap]
          msg := sprintf("Container %v adds dangerous capability: %v", [container.name, cap])
        }

        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
          container.securityContext.privileged == true
          msg := sprintf("Container %v runs in privileged mode", [container.name])
        }

        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
          container.securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation == true
          msg := sprintf("Container %v allows privilege escalation", [container.name])
        }

        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          input.review.object.spec.hostPID == true
          msg := "Pod uses host PID namespace"
        }

        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          input.review.object.spec.hostNetwork == true
          msg := "Pod uses host network"
        }

Runtime Detection with Falco

# /etc/falco/rules.d/privesc-detection.yaml
- rule: Setuid Binary Execution in Container
  desc: Detect execution of setuid/setgid binaries in a container
  condition: >
    spawned_process and container and
    (proc.name in (su, sudo, newgrp, chsh, passwd) or
     proc.is_exe_upper_layer=true)
  output: >
    Setuid/setgid binary executed in container
    (user=%user.name container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
     command=%proc.cmdline parent=%proc.pname)
  priority: WARNING
  tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548]

- rule: Capability Gained in Container
  desc: Detect when a process gains elevated capabilities
  condition: >
    evt.type = capset and container and
    evt.arg.cap != ""
  output: >
    Process gained capabilities in container
    (container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
     capabilities=%evt.arg.cap command=%proc.cmdline)
  priority: WARNING
  tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548.001]

- rule: Container with Dangerous Capabilities Started
  desc: Detect container launched with dangerous capabilities
  condition: >
    container_started and container and
    (container.image.repository != "registry.k8s.io/pause") and
    (container.cap_effective contains SYS_ADMIN or
     container.cap_effective contains SYS_PTRACE or
     container.cap_effective contains SYS_MODULE)
  output: >
    Container with dangerous capabilities
    (container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
     caps=%container.cap_effective)
  priority: CRITICAL
  tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1068]

- rule: Write to /etc/passwd in Container
  desc: Detect writes to /etc/passwd inside container
  condition: >
    open_write and container and fd.name = /etc/passwd
  output: >
    Write to /etc/passwd in container
    (container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
     command=%proc.cmdline user=%user.name)
  priority: CRITICAL
  tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1136]

Kubernetes Audit Log Detection

# audit-policy.yaml - Capture privilege escalation events
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
rules:
  # Log pod creation with security context details
  - level: RequestResponse
    resources:
      - group: ""
        resources: ["pods"]
    verbs: ["create", "update", "patch"]

  # Log privilege escalation attempts
  - level: RequestResponse
    resources:
      - group: "rbac.authorization.k8s.io"
        resources: ["clusterroles", "clusterrolebindings", "roles", "rolebindings"]
    verbs: ["create", "update", "patch", "bind", "escalate"]

  # Log service account token requests
  - level: Metadata
    resources:
      - group: ""
        resources: ["serviceaccounts/token"]
    verbs: ["create"]

Query Audit Logs for Privilege Escalation

# Find pods created with privileged security context
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
  jq 'select(.verb == "create" and .objectRef.resource == "pods") |
  select(.requestObject.spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true)'

# Find RBAC escalation attempts
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
  jq 'select(.objectRef.resource == "clusterrolebindings" and .verb == "create")'

Investigation Playbook

# Check pod security context
kubectl get pod <pod-name> -n <ns> -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].securityContext}'

# Check effective capabilities
kubectl exec <pod-name> -n <ns> -- cat /proc/1/status | grep -i cap

# List pods running as root
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
  jq '.items[] | select(.spec.containers[].securityContext.runAsUser == 0 or .spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace}'

# Check for hostPath volumes
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
  jq '.items[] | select(.spec.volumes[]?.hostPath != null) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace, paths: [.spec.volumes[].hostPath.path]}'

Best Practices

  1. Enable Pod Security Admission at restricted level for production namespaces
  2. Drop ALL capabilities and add back only what is needed
  3. Set allowPrivilegeEscalation: false on all containers
  4. Run as non-root (runAsNonRoot: true, runAsUser > 0)
  5. Disable automountServiceAccountToken unless API access is needed
  6. Monitor with Falco for runtime privilege escalation attempts
  7. Audit RBAC changes with Kubernetes audit logging
  8. Use seccomp profiles to restrict syscalls

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha122026年10月21日 更新

Audit, detect, and remediate Shadow Credentials misconfigurations on msDS-KeyCredentialLink in Active Directory. Focuses on access-controls, monitoring Event ID 5136, and credential-management hygiene.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha122026年10月21日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha122026年10月21日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha122026年10月21日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha122026年10月21日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

andycungkrinx91/konoha122026年10月21日 更新

查看 andycungkrinx91 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题