跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

code-intelligence

Use when navigating or refactoring code with a language server - choosing between semantic (LSP), exact-text (rg), and fuzzy/semantic search; anchoring LSP calls by position; gating degraded results; and disclosing tool substitutions, in any language.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具Terraform
查看安装方法

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • references/degradation-and-disclosure.md2.5 KB
  • references/lsp-calls.md2.4 KB
  • references/tool-precedence.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Code Intelligence

Pick the search tool by task, not by habit. Generic and language-agnostic; domain skills extend it with server capability matrices and ecosystem prerequisites - for example the terraform-skill plugin (same marketplace) owns the terraform-ls capability matrix and Terraform setup. It is model-triggered guidance, not enforcement.

Tool Precedence

GoalUseTradeoff
Symbol relationships: definition, references, call sites, rename safetyLanguage server (LSP) at a positionNeeds a running server + indexed workspace
Exact text, known name, exhaustive enumeration, config/value filesrg then ReadNo semantic scope; matches strings in comments too
Conceptual / fuzzy / "where might this live" / cross-repo discoveryA semantic/neural search tool, if the host provides oneNot exact; never use for counts or completeness claims

Detail: Precedence Table, When LSP Is Wrong.

Calling the LSP

  • DO call at a position (file:line:character). Anchor the position with a text search for a known occurrence first.
  • DON'T pass a bare symbol name and expect resolution. A name-only call that returns empty is a usage defect, not server failure.
  • DO Read the returned locations for source text; LSP returns locations and symbols, not the lines.
  • DO retry once on a cold start: the first call after launch may return empty while the server indexes.
  • DO prefer the server's own operation when it advertises it: use rename / prepareRename for renames and call hierarchy for callers - they carry language-specific semantics a manual pass misses.
  • DON'T report an unsupported operation as a finding. When the server lacks one, redirect: findReferences (then filter to call sites) instead of call hierarchy; enumerate references then hand-edit instead of a rename provider.

Detail: Position Anchoring, Unsupported Operations.

Degradation Gate

Two distinct cases:

  • No LSP at all (host exposes no language-server tool, or the server fails to start): that IS unavailability. Disclose it on the first line (see below) and use text search. The gate does not apply - there is nothing to gate.
  • LSP callable but a position-anchored call returns empty: do NOT conclude "unavailable" yet. Pass ALL three:
    1. documentSymbol on an in-scope file returns symbols -> server responsive (responsiveness only, NOT proof of complete reference coverage).
    2. The failing call was position-anchored (not symbol-name-only).
    3. That anchored call still returned empty after a cold-start retry.

Only after the three-part case passes is a disclosed text fallback warranted.

Detail: Degradation Gate.

Disclose Substitutions

State any tool substitution OR omission on the FIRST line of the response, not in a later summary (post-hoc accounting is a rule violation):

Intended: <tool>. Actual: <tool>. Reason: <why>. Impact: <completeness/confidence>.

Detail: Disclosure Format.

Do Not Invent a Missing Tool

Before claiming a tool (e.g. rg) is shimmed, aliased, or absent, prove it: type -a <tool>, ls -l the resolved path, <tool> --version shows the expected banner. An unproven "tool is missing" claim followed by a fallback is a verification failure, not a sanctioned substitution.

If genuinely absent or aliased: prefer the LSP for semantic tasks; for exact text use the host-approved text search; git grep / grep only as an explicitly disclosed last resort, never the default substitute.

Detail: Anti-Phantom-Shim Proof.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

报告此技能的问题