跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

pdf-ingestion

Get a PDF into the model without blowing the context window or losing structure. Native PDF beats OCR-then-text for most cases; extract-then-summarize beats native for very long docs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

PDF Ingestion

Three ways to feed a PDF to the model, in increasing order of preprocessing:

  1. Native PDF input — pass the file directly. Model sees pages as images + extracted text. Best for docs under ~100 pages with meaningful layout (tables, figures, forms). Preserves structure.

  2. Text extraction then send — pdftotext / pypdf / equivalent, then send the text. Loses layout but cheap. Fine for prose-heavy docs where tables don't matter.

  3. Extract → chunk → summarize → send — for docs >100 pages or when you'll query the same doc many times. Preprocess once, cache the summary.

Deciding which path

Doc shapePath
<20 pages, layout matters (report, form, invoice)Native
<20 pages, pure prose (article, memo)Text extraction
20-100 pages, mixedNative, but chunk if context tight
>100 pagesExtract → chunk → summarize
Scanned PDF (no text layer)OCR first (Tesseract or vision model), then treat as extracted text
Tables are the pointNative — text extractors mangle tables
Figures/diagrams are the pointNative + explicit "describe the figure on page N" prompt

Native PDF — the good defaults

  • Cache the PDF at a prompt-caching breakpoint (see prompt-caching). Native PDFs are large — every uncached turn costs full input price on the whole doc.
  • Ask about specific pages ("summarize section 3.2 on page 14") rather than the whole doc. The model handles targeted queries better than "summarize this 80-page report".
  • Follow up with page-cited claims — "on which page does the doc say X?" — as a sanity check the model isn't hallucinating.

Extract-then-send — the traps

  • pdftotext reading order. Multi-column PDFs come out as interleaved lines. Use pdftotext -layout for column preservation, or pdftotext -raw for straight reading order — pick per doc, don't guess.
  • Tables become word soup. If tables are load-bearing, native or per-table image extraction. Not text.
  • Headers/footers repeat on every page. Strip them before sending, or the model will treat them as content.
  • Footnotes drift to random positions in the extracted stream. Filter or accept the noise.

Extract → chunk → summarize (long docs)

  • Chunk by section, not by token count. A section-aware split respects the doc's logic; a naive 4K-token split cuts sentences and tables.
  • Summarize per section into a "map" — 1-2 paragraphs each. Keep the map short enough to fit in context whole (~2-4K tokens for a 200-page doc).
  • Store the full section text alongside the map (paths in a manifest). Fetch on demand when a question needs detail beyond the summary.
  • Cache the map at a prompt-caching breakpoint so multi-turn Q&A over the doc doesn't reprocess.

Red flags

  • Sending a 200-page PDF native to answer one question. Extract the relevant page range first.
  • Trusting the text extractor on a form or invoice. Layout carries meaning. Use native.
  • OCR'ing a PDF that already has a text layer. Check pdftotext -q file.pdf - first — if text comes out, no OCR needed.
  • No page citations in output. Model can hallucinate confidently across long PDFs. Force page numbers into the response format.
  • Re-uploading the same PDF every turn without caching. Cost climbs linearly; a 5-minute cache fixes it.

Loopkit-adjacent

If the PDF is a spec, extract it into PROMPT.md via spec-first — the agent should re-read prose, not re-scan the PDF, on every turn.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a11y-pass

免费

Catch the accessibility failures that ship in almost every AI-built UI. Use after building any interactive component.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before compaction Loopkit extracts decisions into claude-decisions.json (machine-readable). Read it alongside claude-progress.txt at session start — prose is for humans, JSON is for the loop.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Review a diff against the goal spec assuming the code is BROKEN. The reviewer that lives in the maker's head always agrees with itself — this pulls review into a hostile, separate pass. Invoke after every code change before marking work done.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Verify that an endpoint checks ownership, not just authentication. Use on any handler that reads or mutates user data.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Find the exact commit that introduced a bug. Use when something worked before and broke, and you don't know which change did it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before picking new work, smoke-test the last "completed" feature. If it's broken, revert and re-open it before touching anything else. Kills the "looks shipped, isn't shipped" bug across sessions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

查看 Archive228 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题