跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

structured-output

Get JSON out of the model reliably. Prefer tool_use with a schema over prompted-JSON, validate on receive, retry on parse fail. Use when downstream code will parse the response.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Structured Output

Prompted JSON — "reply as JSON" in the system prompt — fails on ~2-8% of calls in the wild: stray prose before the object, trailing commas, unescaped quotes, code fences. That failure rate is fine for a demo and fatal for a loop that runs a thousand times.

The hierarchy — use the strongest that fits

  1. Tool use with schema (best) — declare a tool with a JSON Schema for its input. Force the model to call that tool. The API validates the arguments against the schema before you see them. Malformed JSON never leaves the model. Use this whenever the downstream is a real parser.

  2. JSON mode / response_format (good) — where supported. Guarantees a valid JSON object at the top level; does not guarantee schema conformance. Cheap upgrade over prompted-JSON.

  3. Prompted JSON with strict rules (fallback) — for models/tiers without tool use. Say "output ONLY the JSON object, no code fences, no prose", give an example, and validate on receive. Assume ~5% failure and handle it.

The validate-and-retry pattern

call → parse → if fail: retry once with the parse error appended → parse → if fail: hard fail
  • One retry, not a loop. If the model can't produce it in two tries, the schema is too complex or the prompt is wrong. Log and stop.
  • Feed the parse error back verbatim on retry — the model will fix specific issues ("expected string at line 3") that it can't guess from a generic "please try again".
  • Never silently coerce. If a required field is missing, fail loudly. Auto-defaults hide prompt bugs.

Schema design — keep it flat

  • Flat objects beat nested. Every level of nesting is another chance to hallucinate.
  • Enums over free strings. "severity": "high|medium|low" not "severity": "...".
  • Optional fields default to null explicitly in the schema. Don't ask the model to "omit if unknown".
  • No additionalProperties: true without a reason. If the model can add fields, it will, and they'll be inconsistent.

When free JSON is acceptable

  • Single scalar field, low-stakes ({"answer": "yes"}).
  • Human-in-the-loop reviewing every output.
  • Prototype throwaway.

Otherwise use tool_use.

Red flags

  • Regex to extract JSON from a code fence. You're one prompt tweak away from breakage. Use tool_use.
  • json.loads with a bare try/except: pass. Silent failure — you'll be debugging a downstream nil for hours.
  • Schema is a wall of oneOf/anyOf. Split into multiple tools and let the model choose which to call.
  • "Just add 'ONLY JSON' to the system prompt" in a hot loop. Works 95% of the time. That's the problem.
  • Different structured output on retry with same input. Set temperature to 0 for extraction tasks.

Loopkit-adjacent

Loopkit's adversarial-verify output is {"passes": bool, "failures": [...]} — that is exactly the shape this skill formalizes. When you compose skills, keep every machine-consumed hop tool_use'd.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a11y-pass

免费

Catch the accessibility failures that ship in almost every AI-built UI. Use after building any interactive component.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before compaction Loopkit extracts decisions into claude-decisions.json (machine-readable). Read it alongside claude-progress.txt at session start — prose is for humans, JSON is for the loop.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Review a diff against the goal spec assuming the code is BROKEN. The reviewer that lives in the maker's head always agrees with itself — this pulls review into a hostile, separate pass. Invoke after every code change before marking work done.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Verify that an endpoint checks ownership, not just authentication. Use on any handler that reads or mutates user data.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Find the exact commit that introduced a bug. Use when something worked before and broke, and you don't know which change did it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before picking new work, smoke-test the last "completed" feature. If it's broken, revert and re-open it before touching anything else. Kills the "looks shipped, isn't shipped" bug across sessions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

查看 Archive228 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题