Catch the accessibility failures that ship in almost every AI-built UI. Use after building any interactive component.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Get JSON out of the model reliably. Prefer tool_use with a schema over prompted-JSON, validate on receive, retry on parse fail. Use when downstream code will parse the response.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Prompted JSON — "reply as JSON" in the system prompt — fails on ~2-8% of calls in the wild: stray prose before the object, trailing commas, unescaped quotes, code fences. That failure rate is fine for a demo and fatal for a loop that runs a thousand times.
Tool use with schema (best) — declare a tool with a JSON Schema for its input. Force the model to call that tool. The API validates the arguments against the schema before you see them. Malformed JSON never leaves the model. Use this whenever the downstream is a real parser.
JSON mode / response_format (good) — where supported. Guarantees a valid JSON object at the top level; does not guarantee schema conformance. Cheap upgrade over prompted-JSON.
Prompted JSON with strict rules (fallback) — for models/tiers without tool use. Say "output ONLY the JSON object, no code fences, no prose", give an example, and validate on receive. Assume ~5% failure and handle it.
call → parse → if fail: retry once with the parse error appended → parse → if fail: hard fail
"severity": "high|medium|low" not "severity": "...".additionalProperties: true without a reason. If the model can add fields, it will, and they'll be inconsistent.{"answer": "yes"}).Otherwise use tool_use.
json.loads with a bare try/except: pass. Silent failure — you'll be debugging a downstream nil for hours.oneOf/anyOf. Split into multiple tools and let the model choose which to call.Loopkit's adversarial-verify output is {"passes": bool, "failures": [...]} — that is exactly the shape this skill formalizes. When you compose skills, keep every machine-consumed hop tool_use'd.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Catch the accessibility failures that ship in almost every AI-built UI. Use after building any interactive component.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Before compaction Loopkit extracts decisions into claude-decisions.json (machine-readable). Read it alongside claude-progress.txt at session start — prose is for humans, JSON is for the loop.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review a diff against the goal spec assuming the code is BROKEN. The reviewer that lives in the maker's head always agrees with itself — this pulls review into a hostile, separate pass. Invoke after every code change before marking work done.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Verify that an endpoint checks ownership, not just authentication. Use on any handler that reads or mutates user data.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Find the exact commit that introduced a bug. Use when something worked before and broke, and you don't know which change did it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Before picking new work, smoke-test the last "completed" feature. If it's broken, revert and re-open it before touching anything else. Kills the "looks shipped, isn't shipped" bug across sessions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。