<!-- CORE-OVERLAY-START -->
This repository (Asymmetric-al/core)
These repo-owned sections sit above the official OpenSpec skill. Reconcile this
overlay after upstream refreshes before running bun run skills:sync.
Use the locally pinned CLI only: bun run openspec -- <command>. Do not invoke
@latest. Core does not use Stores. Pass an explicit change ID before any
mutating OpenSpec operation. Follow AGENTS.md and docs/ai/rules/openspec.md.
Do not bypass TDD, exact base-maia, data-access boundaries, security, or
repository checks. Do not archive unmerged or incomplete work. Do not run
openspec update against the live customized repository. Do not treat product
runtime Eve as a coding agent.
Allowed-tools metadata includes Bash(bun:*) so the local wrapper can run.
Triggers
- The matching OpenSpec workflow is requested: Explore, Propose, Update, Apply,
Verify, Sync, or Archive.
- Numbered commands
/1-start-project through /4-close-project wrap these
workflows.
Workflow
- Read
openspec/config.yaml, openspec/project.md, and the relevant specs
or active change.
- Invoke
bun run openspec -- with the explicit change ID for mutating work.
- Keep Core TDD, UI, data-boundary, and Guardian rules in force.
- Leave the change active until implementation has merged.
Checklist
<!-- CORE-OVERLAY-END -->
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Project check: Before writing, run bun run openspec -- list --json and confirm the root is the Core checkout containing its local openspec/ tree. A missing root, Store declaration, or external root is a configuration error: stop before writing and report it. Do not initialize a root or select an external Store.
Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /openspec-apply-change add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select one
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /openspec-apply-change <other>).
-
Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
planningHome, changeRoot, and actionContext: planning scope and edit constraints
- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
This returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status, source path, and source line
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
- Optional
context: current required project instruction input from the selected root
- Optional
operationGuidance: current advisory guidance for apply
missingArtifacts (when present): required artifact ids with no output
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked": show the message and pause implementation.
- If
missingArtifacts is non-empty: verify whether /openspec-continue-change is installed before suggesting it. Core does not install it; if unavailable, use bun run openspec -- status --change "<name>" --json to identify the next artifact and bun run openspec -- instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json for its template and instructions. Creating the missing artifact is a separate authorized step; keep implementation paused.
- Otherwise, follow the CLI instruction to create or repair the schema-configured tracking file from existing planning artifacts. Do not assume another artifact is ready or start implementation while blocked.
- If
state: "all_done": report that all tracked tasks are complete and suggest review or verification as appropriate before archiving
- Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Treat context as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
Treat operationGuidance as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
workflow.
Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
progress, contextFiles, and the built-in instruction. They are not
evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
Read context files
Read every file path listed under contextFiles from the apply instructions output.
The files depend on the schema being used:
- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
Do not copy context or operationGuidance verbatim into implementation
files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.
-
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Before editing, confirm the checkbox at the returned
sourcePath and line still matches the task description; if it does not, rerun the apply instructions and use the refreshed location
- Mark the task complete at its returned
sourcePath and line: - [ ] → - [x]
- Rerun the apply instructions and confirm that task is now done and progress changed
- Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- A task needs work beyond what the spec and tasks describe, or you are tempted to drop, narrow, defer, or accept exceptions to specified behavior to make it fit → surface the added scope and ask; do not absorb it silently
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
-
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: report that tracked tasks are complete and suggest review or verification as appropriate before archiving
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Output On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tracked tasks are complete. Review or verify the change as appropriate
before archiving. You can archive this change with `/openspec-archive-change`.
Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- When a task needs work beyond what the spec describes, surface the added scope and pause - never silently narrow, defer, or simplify away specified behavior
- Only mark a task
- [x] when its specified behavior is fully implemented, not when it is partially done or deferred
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Use each task's sourcePath and line to update its exact checkbox
- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
Fluid Workflow Integration
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly