跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

agent-expenditure

Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB
  • modules/waste-signals.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Agent Token Waste Monitoring

When To Use

  • After parallel agent dispatch completes
  • When evaluating whether to increase agent count
  • During retrospectives on agent-heavy workflows
  • When plan-before-large-dispatch rule triggers

When NOT To Use

  • Single-agent workflows (no coordination overhead)
  • During active agent execution (post-hoc analysis)
  • For token budgeting (use token-conservation instead)

Brooks's Law for Agents

Dispatching more agents does not always help. Coordination overhead grows with agent count:

Agent CountExpected OverheadGuidance
1-3NegligibleDispatch freely
4-510-15%Acceptable; plan first
6-820-30%Monitor closely
9+30%+Likely counterproductive

Coordination overhead is measured as shared-file conflicts: concurrent Read/Write operations on the same file by different agents, as a percentage of total agent runtime.

Post-Dispatch Review Checklist

After parallel agent runs, evaluate:

  1. Did each agent produce unique findings?
  2. Was total token expenditure proportional to value?
  3. Did any agent duplicate another's work?
  4. Would fewer agents have produced the same result?

If 2+ questions answer no, reduce agent count in future dispatches of the same type.

Waste Signals

See modules/waste-signals.md for the 5 waste signal categories and detection criteria.

Cross-References

  • Dispatching 4 or more agents needs an agreed plan first: the roster, each agent's scope, and the output contract it returns. 1-3 agents may dispatch directly.
  • conserve:token-conservation for session-level token budgeting
  • conjure:agent-teams for dispatch coordination

Exit Criteria

  • All 4 post-dispatch review questions answered with explicit yes/no per agent (unique findings, proportional expenditure, no duplication, fewer agents sufficient)
  • Waste signals from modules/waste-signals.md checked against the completed run; any triggered signal named with the category
  • A recommendation is produced: either "reduce agent count to N" or "dispatch was efficient" with coordination overhead percentage
  • If 2+ review questions answer no, a concrete agent-count reduction is stated for future dispatches of the same type

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

athola/claude-night-market3432026年10月24日 更新

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

athola/claude-night-market3432026年10月24日 更新

Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

athola/claude-night-market3432026年10月24日 更新

Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

athola/claude-night-market3432026年10月24日 更新

Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

athola/claude-night-market3432026年10月24日 更新

Generates a Mermaid architecture diagram showing high-level component relationships. Use when visualizing how plugins or modules fit together.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

athola/claude-night-market3432026年10月24日 更新

查看 athola 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题