跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

vulnerability-scanner

Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP 2025, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • checklists.md2.7 KB
  • scripts/security_scan.py17.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Vulnerability Scanner

Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.

🔧 Runtime Scripts

Execute for automated validation:

ScriptPurposeUsage
scripts/security_scan.pyValidate security principles appliedpython scripts/security_scan.py <project_path>

📋 Reference Files

FilePurpose
checklists.mdOWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists

1. Security Expert Mindset

Core Principles

PrincipleApplication
Assume BreachDesign as if attacker already inside
Zero TrustNever trust, always verify
Defense in DepthMultiple layers, no single point
Least PrivilegeMinimum required access only
Fail SecureOn error, deny access

Threat Modeling Questions

Before scanning, ask:

  1. What are we protecting? (Assets)
  2. Who would attack? (Threat actors)
  3. How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
  4. What's the impact? (Business risk)

2. OWASP Top 10:2025

Risk Categories

RankCategoryThink About
A01Broken Access ControlWho can access what? IDOR, SSRF
A02Security MisconfigurationDefaults, headers, exposed services
A03Software Supply Chain 🆕Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity
A04Cryptographic FailuresWeak crypto, exposed secrets
A05InjectionUser input → system commands
A06Insecure DesignFlawed architecture
A07Authentication FailuresSession, credential management
A08Integrity FailuresUnsigned updates, tampered data
A09Logging & AlertingBlind spots, no monitoring
A10Exceptional Conditions 🆕Error handling, fail-open states

2025 Key Changes

2021 → 2025 Shifts:
├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms

3. Supply Chain Security (A03)

Attack Surface

VectorRiskQuestion to Ask
DependenciesMalicious packagesDo we audit new deps?
Lock filesIntegrity attacksAre they committed?
Build pipelineCI/CD compromiseWho can modify?
RegistryTyposquattingVerified sources?

Defense Principles

  • Verify package integrity (checksums)
  • Pin versions, audit updates
  • Use private registries for critical deps
  • Sign and verify artifacts

4. Attack Surface Mapping

What to Map

CategoryElements
Entry PointsAPIs, forms, file uploads
Data FlowsInput → Process → Output
Trust BoundariesWhere auth/authz checked
AssetsSecrets, PII, business data

Prioritization Matrix

Risk = Likelihood × Impact

High Impact + High Likelihood → CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood  → HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood  → MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood   → LOW

5. Risk Prioritization

CVSS + Context

FactorWeightQuestion
CVSS ScoreBase severityHow severe is the vuln?
EPSS ScoreExploit likelihoodIs it being exploited?
Asset ValueBusiness contextWhat's at risk?
ExposureAttack surfaceInternet-facing?

Prioritization Decision Tree

Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
└── NO → Check CVSS
         ├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
         ├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
         └── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later

6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)

Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed

ScenarioFail-Open (BAD)Fail-Closed (GOOD)
Auth errorAllow accessDeny access
Parsing failsAccept inputReject input
TimeoutRetry foreverLimit + abort

What to Check

  • Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
  • Missing error handling on security operations
  • Race conditions in auth/authz
  • Resource exhaustion scenarios

7. Scanning Methodology

Phase-Based Approach

1. RECONNAISSANCE
   └── Understand the target
       ├── Technology stack
       ├── Entry points
       └── Data flows

2. DISCOVERY
   └── Identify potential issues
       ├── Configuration review
       ├── Dependency analysis
       └── Code pattern search

3. ANALYSIS
   └── Validate and prioritize
       ├── False positive elimination
       ├── Risk scoring
       └── Attack chain mapping

4. REPORTING
   └── Actionable findings
       ├── Clear reproduction steps
       ├── Business impact
       └── Remediation guidance

8. Code Pattern Analysis

High-Risk Patterns

PatternRiskLook For
String concat in queriesInjection"SELECT * FROM " + user_input
Dynamic code executionRCEeval(), exec(), Function()
Unsafe deserializationRCEpickle.loads(), unserialize()
Path manipulationTraversalUser input in file paths
Disabled securityVariousverify=False, --insecure

Secret Patterns

TypeIndicators
API Keysapi_key, apikey, high entropy
Tokenstoken, bearer, jwt
Credentialspassword, secret, key
CloudAWS_, AZURE_, GCP_ prefixes

9. Cloud Security Considerations

Shared Responsibility

LayerYou OwnProvider Owns
Data✅❌
Application✅❌
OS/RuntimeDependsDepends
Infrastructure❌✅

Cloud-Specific Checks

  • IAM: Least privilege applied?
  • Storage: Public buckets?
  • Network: Security groups tightened?
  • Secrets: Using secrets manager?

10. Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't✅ Do
Scan without understandingMap attack surface first
Alert on every CVEPrioritize by exploitability + asset
Ignore false positivesMaintain verified baseline
Fix symptoms onlyAddress root causes
Scan once before deployContinuous scanning
Trust third-party deps blindlyVerify integrity, audit code

11. Reporting Principles

Finding Structure

Each finding should answer:

  1. What? - Clear vulnerability description
  2. Where? - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
  3. Why? - Root cause explanation
  4. Impact? - Business consequence
  5. How to fix? - Specific remediation

Severity Classification

SeverityCriteria
CriticalRCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure
HighData exposure, privilege escalation
MediumLimited scope, requires conditions
LowInformational, best practice

Remember: Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

2d-games

免费

2D game development principles. Sprites, tilemaps, physics, camera.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

3d-games

免费

3D game development principles. Rendering, shaders, physics, cameras.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

Expert in building 3D experiences for the web - Three.js, React Three Fiber, Spline, WebGL, and interactive 3D scenes. Covers product configurators, 3D portfolios, immersive websites, and bringing depth to web experiences. Use when: 3D website, three.js, WebGL, react three fiber, 3D experience.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "attack Active Directory", "exploit AD", "Kerberoasting", "DCSync", "pass-the-hash", "BloodHound enumeration", "Golden Ticket", "Silver Ticket", "AS-REP roasting", "NTLM relay", or needs guidance on Windows domain penetration testing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

Use when you need to address review or issue comments on an open GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

查看 AxelMrak 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题