跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

llm-cost-optimization

Reduce LLM API and infrastructure costs through model selection, prompt caching, batching, caching, quantization, and self-hosting strategies. Track spend by team and model, set budgets, and implement cost-aware routing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具OpenAI
查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

LLM Cost Optimization

Cut LLM costs by 50–90% with the right combination of caching, model selection, prompt optimization, and self-hosting.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • LLM API spend is growing faster than revenue
  • You need to attribute AI costs to teams, products, or customers
  • Implementing caching to avoid redundant LLM calls
  • Deciding when to switch from API providers to self-hosted models
  • Optimizing prompt length without sacrificing quality

Cost Levers by Impact

StrategyTypical SavingsEffort
Semantic caching20–50%Low
Model right-sizing30–70%Low
Prompt compression10–30%Medium
Provider caching (prompt cache)10–25%Low
Batching offline workloads50% (Batch API)Medium
Self-hosting 7–8B models80–95% at scaleHigh
Quantization30–50% VRAM costMedium

Track Costs First

# Use LiteLLM's cost tracking (automatic per-model pricing)
import litellm

response = litellm.completion(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)
cost = litellm.completion_cost(response)
print(f"Cost: ${cost:.6f}")

# Add custom cost callbacks
def log_cost(kwargs, completion_response, start_time, end_time):
    cost = kwargs.get("response_cost", 0)
    model = kwargs.get("model")
    user = kwargs.get("user")
    # Send to your analytics DB
    db.record_cost(user=user, model=model, cost=cost)

litellm.success_callback = [log_cost]

Model Right-Sizing

# Route by task complexity — don't use GPT-4o for everything
def get_model_for_task(task_type: str) -> str:
    routing = {
        "classification":     "gpt-4o-mini",      # ~30× cheaper than gpt-4o
        "summarization":      "gpt-4o-mini",
        "extraction":         "gpt-4o-mini",
        "simple_qa":          "gpt-4o-mini",
        "complex_reasoning":  "gpt-4o",
        "code_generation":    "claude-sonnet-4-6",
        "creative_writing":   "claude-opus-4-6",
    }
    return routing.get(task_type, "gpt-4o-mini")

# Cost comparison (per 1M tokens, 2025 approx.)
# gpt-4o-mini:          input $0.15 / output $0.60
# gpt-4o:               input $2.50 / output $10.00
# claude-sonnet-4-6:    input $3.00 / output $15.00
# llama-3.1-8b (self):  ~$0.05–0.10 all-in (GPU amortized)

Prompt Caching (Provider-Side)

# Anthropic — cache long system prompts (saves 90% on cached tokens)
import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
    max_tokens=1024,
    system=[
        {
            "type": "text",
            "text": "You are a helpful assistant.",
        },
        {
            "type": "text",
            "text": open("large-context.txt").read(),  # large doc
            "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},     # cache this!
        }
    ],
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the key points."}],
)
# First call: full price. Subsequent calls: 90% discount on cached part.
print(f"Cache read tokens: {response.usage.cache_read_input_tokens}")

# OpenAI — prompt caching is automatic for repeated prefixes >1024 tokens
# No code change needed; check usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens

Batching with OpenAI Batch API (50% Discount)

import json
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

# Prepare batch requests
requests = [
    {
        "custom_id": f"task-{i}",
        "method": "POST",
        "url": "/v1/chat/completions",
        "body": {
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": f"Classify: {text}"}],
            "max_tokens": 50,
        }
    }
    for i, text in enumerate(texts)
]

# Write JSONL file
with open("batch.jsonl", "w") as f:
    for req in requests:
        f.write(json.dumps(req) + "\n")

# Upload and create batch
batch_file = client.files.create(file=open("batch.jsonl", "rb"), purpose="batch")
batch = client.batches.create(
    input_file_id=batch_file.id,
    endpoint="/v1/chat/completions",
    completion_window="24h",
)
print(f"Batch ID: {batch.id}")  # poll status with client.batches.retrieve(batch.id)

Semantic Caching

import hashlib
import json
import redis
import numpy as np
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

r = redis.Redis(host="localhost", port=6379)
embed_model = SentenceTransformer("BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5")

SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD = 0.92
CACHE_TTL = 3600 * 24  # 24 hours

def cached_llm_call(prompt: str, llm_fn) -> str:
    # 1. Exact match (free)
    exact_key = f"exact:{hashlib.sha256(prompt.encode()).hexdigest()}"
    if cached := r.get(exact_key):
        return cached.decode()

    # 2. Semantic match
    query_vec = embed_model.encode(prompt)
    cached_keys = r.keys("sem:*")
    for key in cached_keys:
        data = json.loads(r.get(key))
        similarity = np.dot(query_vec, data["embedding"]) / (
            np.linalg.norm(query_vec) * np.linalg.norm(data["embedding"])
        )
        if similarity >= SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD:
            return data["response"]

    # 3. Cache miss — call LLM
    response = llm_fn(prompt)

    # Store exact match
    r.setex(exact_key, CACHE_TTL, response)

    # Store semantic embedding
    sem_key = f"sem:{hashlib.sha256(prompt.encode()).hexdigest()}"
    r.setex(sem_key, CACHE_TTL, json.dumps({
        "embedding": query_vec.tolist(),
        "response": response,
        "prompt": prompt,
    }))
    return response

Prompt Compression

# LLMLingua — compress long prompts by 3–20× with minimal quality loss
from llmlingua import PromptCompressor

compressor = PromptCompressor(
    model_name="microsoft/llmlingua-2-bert-base-multilingual-cased-meetingbank",
    device_map="cpu",
)

compressed = compressor.compress_prompt(
    long_context,
    ratio=0.5,       # keep 50% of tokens
    rank_method="longllmlingua",
)
print(f"Original: {len(long_context.split())} words")
print(f"Compressed: {len(compressed['compressed_prompt'].split())} words")
print(f"Savings: {compressed['saving']}")

Self-Hosting Break-Even Calculator

def break_even_analysis(
    monthly_api_spend_usd: float,
    gpu_cost_per_hour_usd: float = 2.50,   # e.g., A10G on AWS
    utilization: float = 0.70,             # 70% GPU utilization
) -> dict:
    monthly_gpu_cost = gpu_cost_per_hour_usd * 24 * 30 * utilization
    break_even = monthly_gpu_cost / monthly_api_spend_usd
    recommendation = (
        "Self-host now — strong ROI" if break_even < 0.5 else
        "Self-host if traffic grows 2×" if break_even < 0.8 else
        "Stick with API — not enough scale yet"
    )
    return {
        "monthly_gpu_cost": f"${monthly_gpu_cost:.0f}",
        "monthly_api_spend": f"${monthly_api_spend_usd:.0f}",
        "gpu_as_pct_of_api": f"{break_even*100:.0f}%",
        "recommendation": recommendation,
    }

# Example: $5k/month on OpenAI, $2.50/hr A10G
print(break_even_analysis(5000))
# → gpu_cost ~$1,260/mo = 25% of API spend → self-host now

Cost Dashboard (Grafana)

# Emit cost metrics to Prometheus
from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram

llm_cost_total = Counter(
    "llm_cost_usd_total",
    "Total LLM spend in USD",
    ["model", "team", "task_type"],
)
llm_tokens_total = Counter(
    "llm_tokens_total",
    "Total tokens used",
    ["model", "token_type"],  # token_type: prompt, completion, cached
)

def track_call(model, team, task_type, response):
    cost = calculate_cost(model, response.usage)
    llm_cost_total.labels(model=model, team=team, task_type=task_type).inc(cost)
    llm_tokens_total.labels(model=model, token_type="prompt").inc(
        response.usage.prompt_tokens)
    llm_tokens_total.labels(model=model, token_type="completion").inc(
        response.usage.completion_tokens)

Best Practices

  • Use gpt-4o-mini or claude-haiku for 80% of tasks — they're 10–30× cheaper.
  • Enable prompt caching for system prompts >1,024 tokens (Anthropic) or >1,024 tokens (OpenAI).
  • Audit your top 5 prompts by token count — compress or cache them.
  • Set hard budget limits with LiteLLM virtual keys before costs spiral.
  • Self-host 7B–8B models when monthly API spend exceeds $2k/month.

Related Skills

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills11652026年5月22日 更新

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills11652026年5月22日 更新

Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills11652026年5月22日 更新

Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills11652026年5月22日 更新

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills11652026年5月22日 更新

Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills11652026年5月22日 更新

查看 BagelHole 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题